[46 Pa.B. 2518]
[Saturday, May 21, 2016]
[Continued from previous Web Page]
[Official Note—2014] The 2014 amendments to Pa.R.A.P. 1513(d) relating to the general statement of objections in an appellate jurisdiction petition for review are intended to preclude a finding of waiver if the court is able, based on the certified record, to address an issue not within the issues stated in the petition for review but included in the statement of questions involved and argued in a brief. The amendment neither expands the scope of issues that may be addressed in an appellate jurisdiction petition for review beyond those permitted in Pa.R.A.P. 1551(a) nor affects Pa.R.A.P. 2116's requirement that ''[n]o question will be considered unless it is stated in the statement of questions involved [in appellant's brief] or is fairly suggested thereby.''
Rule 1514. Filing and Service of the Petition for Review.
(a) Filing with the prothonotary.—The petition for review, with proof of the service that is required by [Subdivision] paragraph (c) of this rule, shall be filed with the prothonotary of the appellate court in person or by first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail.
If the petition for review is filed by first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail, the petition shall be deemed received by the prothonotary for the purposes of [Rule 121(a) (filing)] Pa.R.A.P. 121(a) on the date deposited in the United States mail, as shown on a United States Postal Service Form 3817, Certificate of Mailing, or other similar United States Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified. The certificate of mailing or other similar Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified shall be cancelled by the Postal Service and shall show the docket number of the matter in the government unit, and shall be either enclosed with the petition or separately mailed to the prothonotary.
Upon actual receipt of the petition for review, the prothonotary shall immediately:
(1) stamp it with the date of actual receipt. That date, or the date of earlier deposit in the United States mail as prescribed in this [subdivision] paragraph, shall constitute the date of filing;
(2) assign a docket number to the petition for review; and
(3) give written notice of the docket number assignment in person or by first class mail to the government unit that made the determination sought to be reviewed, to the petitioner, and to the other persons named in the proof of service accompanying the petition.
(b) Fee.—The petitioner, upon filing the petition for review, shall pay any fees therefor as set by law or general rule.
(c) Service.—A copy of the petition for review shall be served by the petitioner in person or by certified mail on both the government unit that made the determination sought to be reviewed and the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. [In matters involving the Commonwealth, the petitioner shall similarly serve a copy upon the Attorney General of Pennsylvania.] Where there is more than one respondent, the petitioner shall separately serve each one. All other parties before the government unit that made the determination sought to be reviewed shall be served as prescribed by [Rule 121(b) (service of all papers required)] Pa.R.A.P. 121.
(d) Entry of appearance.—Upon the filing of the petition for review, the prothonotary shall note on the docket as counsel for the petitioner the name of counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for review, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The prothonotary shall, upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed within 30 days after filing of the petition, strike off or correct the record of appearances. Thereafter a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
Official Note: See the Official Note to [Rule 1112 (appeals by allowance)] Pa.R.A.P. 1112 for an explanation of the procedure when Form 3817 or other similar United States Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified is used.
The petition for review must be served on the government unit that made the determination in question. [Rule 102 defines ''government unit'' as including ''any court or other officer or agency of the unified judicial system.'' Thus, a petition for review of a trial court order must be served on the judge who issued the order.]
Service on the Attorney General shall be made at: Strawberry Square, Harrisburg, PA 17120.
With respect to appearances by new counsel following the initial docketing of appearances pursuant to [Subdivision] paragraph (d) of this rule, please note the requirements of [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 120.
Rule 1515. (Rescinded).
Official Note: [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1515 formerly provided for an answer to a petition for review addressed to an appellate court's original jurisdiction. Answers to such petitions are now discussed in [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1516.
Rule 1516. Other Pleadings Allowed.
(a) Appellate jurisdiction petitions for review.—No answer or other pleading to an appellate jurisdiction petition for review is authorized, unless the petition for review is filed pursuant to [the Notes to Rules 341 or 1311 (seeking review of a trial court or other government unit's refusal to certify an interlocutory order for immediate appeal), Rule 1573 (review of orders finding an assertion of double jeopardy frivolous), Rule 1762 (regarding release in criminal matters), Rule 1770 (regarding placement in juvenile delinquency matters), Rule 3321 (regarding appeals from decisions of the Legislative Reapportionment Commission) or Rule 3331 (regarding review of special prosecutions and investigations)] Pa.R.A.P. 3321. Where an answer is authorized, the time for filing an answer shall be as stated in [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 123(b).
(b) Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—Where an action is commenced by filing a petition for review addressed to the appellate court's original jurisdiction, the pleadings are limited to the petition for review, an answer thereto, a reply if the answer contains new matter or a counterclaim, a counter-reply if the reply to a counterclaim contains new matter, [a preliminary objection] preliminary objections, and [an answer] answers thereto. Every pleading filed after an original jurisdiction petition for review shall be filed within 30 days after service of the preceding pleading, but no pleading need be filed unless the preceding pleading is endorsed with a notice to plead.
Official Note: [The 2004, 2012, and 2013 amendments made clear that, with limited exceptions, no answer or other pleading to a petition for review addressed to an appellate court's appellate jurisdiction is proper.] With regard to original jurisdiction proceedings, practice is patterned after [Rules of Civil Procedure 1017(a) (Pleadings Allowed) and 1026 (Time for Filing. Notice to Plead)] Pa.R.C.P. 1017(a) and 1026. The ten additional days in which to file a subsequent pleading are in recognition of the time required for agency coordination where the Commonwealth is a party. [See Rule 1762(b)(2) regarding bail applications. See Rule 1770 regarding placement in juvenile delinquency matters.]
Rule 1517. Applicable Rules of Pleading.
Unless otherwise prescribed by these rules, the practice and procedure under this chapter relating to pleadings in original jurisdiction petition for review practice shall be in accordance with the appropriate Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, so far as they may be applied.
[Official Note: See Rule 1762(b)(2) regarding bail applications. See Rule 1770 regarding placement in juvenile delinquency matters. See also Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]
Rule 1531. Intervention.
(a) Appellate jurisdiction petition for review proceedings. A party to a proceeding before a government unit that resulted in a quasijudicial order may intervene as of right in a proceeding under this chapter relating to such order by filing a notice of intervention (with proof of service on all parties to the matter) with the prothonotary of the appellate court within 30 days after notice of the filing of the petition for review. The notice of intervention may be in substantially the following form:
[(CAPTION)]
NOTICE OF INTERVENTIONNotice is hereby given that A.B., a party below, hereby intervenes in this matter.
(s) _________________
_________________
(Address and telephone number)After 30 days after notice of filing of an appellate petition for review, permission to intervene may be sought by application pursuant to [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 123.
(b) Original jurisdiction petition for review proceedings. A person not named as a respondent in an original jurisdiction petition for review[,] who desires to intervene in a proceeding under this chapter, may seek leave to intervene by filing an application for leave to intervene (with proof of service on all parties to the matter) with the prothonotary of the court. The application shall contain a concise statement of the interest of the applicant and the grounds upon which intervention is sought.
Official Note: A nonparty may file a brief as of right under [Rule 531 (participation by amicus curiae)] Pa.R.A.P. 531 and, therefore, intervention is not necessary in order to participate in the appellate court where the petition for review is filed. However, except as provided in [Rule 521(b) (status of Attorney General) and Rule 522(b) (status of Court Administrator)] Pa.R.A.P. 521(b) and Rule 522(b), the mere filing of a brief does not confer party status. Where, for example, a nonparty to a petition for review proceeding in the Commonwealth Court desires to be in a position to seek further review in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania or the Supreme Court of the United States of an order of the Commonwealth Court disposing of the petition for review, the nonparty should intervene or seek leave to intervene in the Commonwealth Court at the outset, [since under Rule 501 (any aggrieved party may appeal)] because under Pa.R.A.P. 501, party status is a prerequisite to the right to further review.
[See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]
Rule 1532. Special and Summary Relief.
(a) Special relief.—At any time after the filing of a petition for review, the court may, on application, order the seizure of property, dispose of seized property, issue a preliminary or special injunction, appoint a temporary receiver, or grant other interim or special relief required in the interest of justice and consistent with the usages and principles of law.
(b) Summary relief.—At any time after the filing of a petition for review in an appellate or original jurisdiction matter, the court may on application enter judgment if the right of the applicant thereto is clear.
Official Note: [Subdivision] Paragraph (a) provides examples of specific types of interim relief that may be sought using the procedures set forth in [Rule 123 (application for relief)] Pa.R.A.P. 123. Thus, multiple forms of relief, including those in the alternative, may be combined in the same application, even though separate actions might otherwise be necessary under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. Compare [Rule 106 (original jurisdiction matters);] Pa.R.A.P. 106 with 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(e) [(single form of action)].
[Subdivision] Paragraph (b) authorizes immediate disposition of a petition for review, similar to the type of relief envisioned by the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure regarding judgment on the pleadings and peremptory and summary judgment. However, such relief may be requested before the pleadings are closed where the right of the applicant is clear.
[See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.
The 1997 amendment to subdivision (b) is analogous to the 1996 amendment to Pa.R.C.P. 1098. The deletion of the last sentence of Rule 1532(b) is intended to eliminate the requirement of filing a motion to open or vacate the order granting summary relief. Under prior practice, a party was required to file a motion to open or vacate the order granting summary relief before an appeal could be taken. An order denying an application for summary relief is not appealable as of right.]
Rule 1541. Certification of the Record.
Upon notice from the appellate court of the filing of a petition for review addressed to the appellate jurisdiction of an appellate court, the government unit shall prepare and transmit the record as provided by Chapter 19 [(preparation and transmission of record and related matters)].
[Official Note: Rule 102 defines ''government unit'' to include ''any court or other officer or agency of the unified judicial system.'' Thus, if the order to be reviewed was filed by a trial court, that court shall certify the record. This occurs when the petition for review was filed pursuant to Rule 1762, 1770, 3321 or 3331, or the note to Rules 341 or 1311.
See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]
Rule 1542. Evidentiary Hearing.
In any matter addressed to the appellate court's original jurisdiction[,] where it appears that a genuine issue as to a material fact has been raised by the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, stipulations of fact, admissions on file, and supporting verified statements, if any, the court on its own motion or on application of any party shall, after notice to the parties, hold an evidentiary hearing for the development of the record.
Official Note: In view of [Rule 106 (original jurisdiction matters) and Rule 1532 (special and summary relief)] Pa.R.A.P. 106 and Pa.R.A.P. 1532, motions for judgment on the pleadings, Pa.R.C.P. 1034, summary relief and summary judgment, Pa.R.C.P. [1035] 1035.1—1035.5, will be available where a petition for review invoking the appellate court's original jurisdiction has been filed. The procedure under this rule is intended to be flexible, although it remains subject to the control of the appellate court [by] either by rule of court adopted pursuant to [Rule 104(a)(3) (rules of court)] Pa.R.A.P. 104(a)(3) or by order.
[See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]
Rule 1543. (Rescinded).
[Official Note: See 42 Pa.C.S. § 5104 (trial by jury).
See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]
Rule 1551. Scope of Review.
(a) Appellate jurisdiction petitions for review.—Review of quasijudicial orders shall be conducted by the court on the record made before the government unit. [No question] Only questions raised before the government unit shall be heard or considered [by the court which was not raised before the government unit], except:
(1) Questions involving the validity of a statute.
(2) Questions involving the jurisdiction of the government unit over the subject matter of the adjudication.
(3) Questions [which] that the court is satisfied [that] the petitioner could not by the exercise of due diligence have raised before the government unit. If, upon hearing before the court, the court is satisfied that any such additional question within the scope of this paragraph should be [so] raised, it shall remand the record to the government unit for further consideration of the additional question.
The court may in any case remand the record to the government unit for further proceedings if the court deems them necessary.
(b) Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—The court shall hear and decide original jurisdiction petitions for review in accordance with law. This chapter is not intended to modify, enlarge, or abridge the rights of any party to an original jurisdiction petition for review.
[Official Note: Subdivision (a) is a generalization of former Pa.R.C.P. 8 and makes no change in substance except to provide that procedural issues not raised below are waived—unless excused under Paragraph (a)(3). Compare Rule 302 (requisites for reviewable issue).
Subdivision (b) is based on Section 10(c) of Article V of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, which prevents this chapter from enlarging the substantive rights of the petitioner or abridging the substantive rights of the government unit named in the petition. Under the new practice, the appellate judge should inquire: ''Assuming that this case had been properly brought before me by a complaint in equity (or in mandamus, replevin, quo warranto, etc., or by two or more of such actions properly consolidated for hearing and disposition) containing the factual allegations of the petition for review, to what relief, if any, would the moving party have been entitled under the prior practice?'' This rule makes clear that the moving party is entitled to the same relief, and no more, under the new practice, since only the procedural requirement for separately labeled papers has been eliminated.
For example, where a party joins both a challenge to the action of a government unit in the nature of an appeal and a challenge to the composition of the government unit in the nature of quo warranto, the latter challenge will come too late under the standards of State Dental Council and Examining Board v. Pollock, 457 Pa. 264, 318 A.2d 910 (1974). Similarly, where a petition for review in the nature of prohibition is filed in the Supreme Court to attack an unappealable order of a lower court, in a case where relief would not have been available on an application for a writ of prohibition under the standards of Carpentertown Coal and Coke Co. v. Laird, 360 Pa. 94, 61 A.2d 426 (1948) and subsequent cases, the change in the label of the papers to a petition for review will not affect the result, and the petition will be dismissed.
See Rule 3331 regarding Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.]
Rule 1561. Disposition of Petition for Review.
(a) Appellate jurisdiction petitions for review.—The court may affirm, modify, vacate, set aside, or reverse any order brought before it for review, and it may remand the matter and direct the entry of such appropriate order, or require such further proceedings as may be just under the circumstances.
(b) Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—Where the petition for review raises questions that formerly were determinable in an action in equity, replevin, mandamus, or quo warranto, or for a declaratory judgment or upon a petition for a writ of certiorari or prohibition, or in another similar plenary action or proceeding, the court may grant the relief heretofore available in any such plenary action or proceeding.
(c) Money damages.—Money damages arising out of tort or contract claims may not be granted under this chapter (except on review of determinations of the Board of Claims or similar agencies), but relief granted under [Subdivision] paragraph (b) of this rule may include any damages to which the petitioner is entitled which are claimed in the petition, which are ancillary to the matter, and which may be granted by a court.
[(d) Review of detention.—Except as prescribed by Rule 1762(b)(2), which governs applications relating to bail when no appeal is pending, or by Rule 3331 (review of special prosecutions or investigations), review in the nature of criminal habeas corpus or post conviction relief may not be granted under this chapter.]
Official Note: [Subdivision] Paragraph (a) is based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 706 [(disposition of appeals)].
[Subdivision] Paragraph (b) is based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(e) [(single form of action) (], which provides that 1 Pa.C.S. § 1504 [(statutory remedy preferred over common law)] does not limit the jurisdiction of a court over a petition for review proceeding, but to the extent applicable [shall limit] limits the relief available and 42 Pa.C.S. § 5105(d)(2) [(scope of appeal)]. Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 102 [(definitions)], statutory references to ''appeal'' include proceedings on petition for review. The [subdivision] paragraph is intended to make clear that the petition for review is a generic pleading [which] that will permit the court to consider simultaneously all aspects of the controversy.
[Subdivision] Paragraph (c) is intended to make clear that the petition for review does not encompass trespass or assumpsit actions, but that an appeal may reach tort or contract matters adjudicated by a government unit as contemplated by Section 2(h) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act [(], 42 P.S. § 20002(h)[)]. As to ancillary statutory damages, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 8303 [(action for performance of a duty required by law)].
[Subdivision (d) is intended to make clear that the scope of this chapter is essentially civil in nature. The application of the petition for review to questions of release prior to sentence in criminal matters and in questions arising out of special prosecutions or investigations is merely a recognition of the technical need for a plenary filing to bring the question within the appellate jurisdiction of the appropriate court.
See Rule 1762(b)(2) regarding bail applications.]
REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS OF THE BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE Rule 1571. Determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue.
(a) General rule.—Review of a determination of the Board of Finance and Revenue shall be governed by this chapter and ancillary provisions of these rules, except as otherwise prescribed by this rule.
(b) Time for petitioning for review.—A petition for review of a determination of the Board of Finance and Revenue shall be filed:
(1) Within 30 days after entry of an order of the Board which does not expressly state that it is interlocutory in nature.
(2) Within 30 days after entry of an order of the Board adopting a determination by the Department of Revenue or other government unit made at the direction of the Board respecting any matter pending before the Board.
(3) Where the Board is required by statute to act finally on any matter pending before it within a specified period after the matter is filed with the Board and has not done so, at any time between:
(i) the expiration of such specified period; and
(ii) 30 days after service of actual notice by the Board stating that it has failed to act within such period.
(c) Form.—The petition for review shall contain:
(1) a statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the court;
(2) the name of the party seeking review;
(3) a statement that the Board of Finance and Revenue made the determination sought to be reviewed;
(4) reference to the order or other determination sought to be reviewed; and a general statement of the objections to the order or other determination.
The petition for review need not be verified and shall not contain or have endorsed upon it notice to plead. A petition for review of a taxpayer or similar party shall name the ''Commonwealth of Pennsylvania'' as respondent and a petition for review filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall name all real parties in interest before the Board as respondents.
(d) Service.—In the case of a petition for review filed by a taxpayer or similar party, the petitioner shall serve a copy of the petition [shall be served] on the Board of Finance and Revenue and on the Attorney General [by the petitioner] in accordance with [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1514(c). All other parties before the Board shall be served as prescribed by [Rule 121(b) (service of all papers required)] Pa.R.A.P. 121(b).
(e) Answer.—An answer may not be filed to a petition for review of a determination of the Board of Finance and Revenue. The Commonwealth may raise any question on review, [although no cross petition] even if no cross-petition for review has been filed by it, and may introduce any facts in support of its position [if 20 days written notice is given to the petitioner prior to trial of the] so long as it provides the petitioner with written notice 20 days prior to trial of its intention of raising [such] new questions or presenting new facts.
(f) Record.—No record shall be certified to the court by the Board of Finance and Revenue. After the filing of the petition for review, the parties shall take appropriate steps to prepare and file a stipulation of such facts as may be agreed to and to identify the issues of fact, if any, which remain to be tried. See [Rule 1542 (evidentiary hearing)] Pa.R.A.P. 1542.
(g) Oral argument.—Except as otherwise ordered by the court on its own motion or on application of any party, after the record is closed, the matter may be listed for argument before or submission to the court.
(h) Scope of review.—[Rule 1551(a) (appellate jurisdiction petitions for review)] Pa.R.A.P. 1551(a) shall be applicable to review of a determination of the Board of Finance and Revenue except that:
(1) A question will be heard and considered by the court if it was raised at any stage of the proceedings below and thereafter preserved.
(2) To the extent provided by the applicable law, the questions raised by the petition for review shall be determined on the record made before the court. See [Subdivision] paragraph (f) of this rule.
(i) Exceptions.—Any party may file exceptions to an initial determination by the court under this rule within 30 days after the entry of the order to which exception is taken. Such timely exceptions shall have the effect, for the purposes of [Rule 1701(b)(3) (authority of lower court or agency after appeal)] Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(3), of an order expressly granting reconsideration of the determination previously entered by the court. Issues not raised on exceptions are waived and cannot be raised on appeal.
Official Note: [Subdivision] Paragraph (b) represents an exercise of the power conferred by 42 Pa.C.S. § 5105(a) [(right to appellate review)] to define final orders by general rule. The following [statutes expressly require] statute expressly requires the Board of Finance and Revenue to act within six months in certain cases:
Section 1103 of The Fiscal Code [(72 P.S. § 1103)], Act of April 9, 1929 (P.L. 343), 72 P.S. § 1103.
[Act of December 5, 1933, (Sp. session 1933-34), (P.L. 38, No. 6), known as the Spirituous and Vinous Liquor Tax Law, § 5 (47 P.S. § 749).
Act of January 14, 1952 (1951 P.L. 1965, No. 550), known as the Fuel Use Tax Act, § 7 (72 P.S. § 2614.7).
Sections 234 (sales and use tax), 341 (personal income tax), and 2005 (malt beverage tax), act of March 4, 1971 (P.L. 6, No. 2), known as The Tax Reform Code of 1971 (72 P.S. §§ 7234, 7341, 9005).]
Section 2005 (malt beverage tax) of The Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March 4, 1971 (P.L. 6), 72 P.S. § 9005.
The following statute requires the Board of Finance and Revenue to act within twelve months in certain tax refund matters:
Section 3003.5 of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, Act of March 4, 1971[, P.L. 6, No. 2] (P.L. 6), 72 P.S. § 10003.5. [Section 3003.5 was added by Section 41 of the Act of June 16, 1994, P.L. 279, No. 48.]
The following statutes are covered by Section 1103 of The Fiscal Code [(petition to Board of Finance and Revenue for review)]:
[Sections 809 (various insurance taxes) and 1001 (miscellaneous settlements, e.g., under the act of May 17, 1921 (P.L. 789, No. 285), known as The Insurance Department Act of 1921, § 212 (40 P.S. § 50) (retaliatory insurance taxes)) of The Fiscal Code (72 P.S. §§ 809 and 1001).
Act of June 22, 1931 (P.L. 694, No. 255) § 4 (72 P.S. § 2186) (motor carriers-trackless trolley carriers).
Act of June 22, 1935 (P.L. 414, No. 182), known as the State Personal Property Tax Act, § 18(b) (72 P.S. § 3250-11a(b)) (corporate loans tax). See Act of April 25, 1929 (P.L. 669, No. 288), § 1.
Act of May 23, 1945 (P.L. 893, No. 360), known as the Co-operative Agricultural Association Corporate Net Income Tax Act, § 6 (72 P.S. § 3420-26).
Act of January 24, 1966 (P.L. (1965) 1509, No. 531), § 11 (40 P.S. § 1006.11) (surplus lines tax).]
Sections 809 (various insurance taxes) and 1001 (miscellaneous settlements, for example, under Section 212 of The Insurance Department Act of 1921, Act of May 17, 1921 (P.L. 789), 40 P.S. § 50) of the Fiscal Code, Act of April 9, 1929 (P.L. 343), 72 P.S. §§ 809 and 1001.
Section 6 of the Co-operative Agricultural Association Corporate Net Income Tax Act, Act of May 23, 1945 (P.L. 893), 72 P.S. § 3420-26.
Sections 407 (corporate net income tax), 603 (capital stock—franchise tax), 702 (bank and trust company shares tax), 802 (title insurance [and trust] companies shares tax), 904 (insurance premiums tax), 1102 (utilities gross receipts tax), 1111-C (realty transfer tax), and 1503 (mutual thrift institutions tax) of the Tax Reform Code of 1971 [(], Act of March 4, 1971 (P.L. 6), 72 P.S. §§ 7407, 7603, 7702, 7802, 7904, 8102, 8111-C, and 8503[)].
75 Pa.C.S. § 9616(f) (motor carriers road tax).
The basis of jurisdiction of the court under this rule will ordinarily be 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 [(direct appeals from government agencies)]. [Subdivision] Paragraph (c) is not intended to change the practice in connection with the review of orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue insofar as the amount of detail in the pleadings is concerned. What is required is that the petitioner raise in the petition for review every legal issue [in the petition for review which] that the petitioner wishes the court to consider. The legal issues raised need only be specific enough to apprise the respondent of the legal issues being contested ([e.g.] for example, ''valuation,'' ''manufacturing,'' ''sale for resale,'' etc.). See generally House of Pasta, Inc. v. Commonwealth, [37 Pa. Cmwlth. Ct. 317,] 390 A.2d 341 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1978).
[Subdivision] Paragraph (e) is based on Section 1104(e) of The Fiscal Code, which was suspended absolutely by these rules, and subsequently repealed.
[Subdivision] Paragraph (f) is based on 2 Pa.C.S. § 501(b)(1) [(scope of subchapter)] and 2 Pa.C.S. § 701(b)(1) [(scope of subchapter)], which exclude tax matters from the on-the-record review requirements of 2 Pa.C.S. § 704 [(disposition of appeal)].
[Subdivision] Paragraph (h) is based on Section 1104(d) of The Fiscal Code, which was suspended absolutely by these rules and subsequently repealed, and is intended as a continuation of the prior law, except, of course, that the separate specification of objections has been abolished by these rules.
[Subdivision] Paragraph (i) is intended to make clear that the failure to file exceptions will result in waiver by a petitioner of any issues previously presented to the Commonwealth Court.
See also [Rule 1782 (security on review in tax matters)] Pa.R.A.P. 1782.
[REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS BY A COURT OF COMMON PLEAS THAT A CLAIM OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY IS FRIVOLOUS] Rule 1573. [Review of Orders in Which the Court Finds an Assertion of Double Jeopardy Frivolous] (Rescinded).
[(a) General rule.—Any party seeking review of a frivolousness determination by a court of common pleas under Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 587 shall file a petition for review in the appellate court having jurisdiction over the matter. Review of a frivolousness determination under Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 587 shall be governed by this chapter and ancillary provisions of these rules, except as otherwise prescribed by this rule. The time for filing is provided for in Pa.R.A.P. 1512(a)(1).
(b) Contents.—The contents of the petition for review are not governed by Pa.R.A.P. 1513. Instead, the petition for review need not be set forth in numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, and shall contain the following (which shall, insofar as practicable, be set forth in the order stated):
(i) A statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the appellate court.
(ii) The text of the order in question, and the date of its entry in the trial court. If the order is voluminous, it may, if more convenient, be appended to the petition.
(iii) A concise statement of the case containing the facts necessary to an understanding of the frivolousness issue(s) presented.
(iv) The question(s) presented, expressed in the terms and circumstances of the case but without unnecessary detail.
(v) A concise statement of the reasons why the trial court erred in its determination of frivolousness.
(vi) There shall be appended to the petition a copy of any opinions relating to the order sought to be reviewed, including findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of the frivolousness determination, as well as a copy of any transcripts or other record documents necessary to the appellate court's review.
(vii) There shall be appended to the petition the verbatim texts of the pertinent provisions of constitutional provisions, statutes, ordinances, regulations or other similar enactments which the case involves.
(viii) There shall be appended to the petition any briefs filed in the trial court in support of the motion to dismiss.
(c) Caption and parties.—The parties in the trial court shall be named as parties in the appellate court. If there are multiple defendants but the order for which review is sought adjudicates the motion of only a single defendant, only that defendant may file a petition for review.
(d) No supporting brief.—All contentions in support of a petition shall be set forth in the body of the petition as prescribed by subparagraph (b)(v) of this rule. No separate brief in support of the petition for review will be received, and the prothonotary of the appellate court will refuse to file any petition for review to which is annexed or appended any brief other than the briefs filed in the trial court.
(e) Essential requisites of petition.—The failure of a petitioner to present with accuracy, brevity, and clearness whatever is essential to a ready and adequate understanding of the points requiring consideration will be a sufficient reason for denying the petition.
(f) Effect of filing petition.—The filing of a petition for review shall not automatically stay the proceedings before the trial court. A petitioner may file an application for a stay in the trial or appellate court pending the determination of the petition for review, or the trial or appellate court may issue a stay sua sponte.
(g) Answer to petition for review.—If the Commonwealth does not intend to file an answer under this rule, it shall, within the time fixed by these rules for filing an answer, file a letter stating that it does not intend to file an answer to the petition for review. The failure to file an answer will not be construed as concurrence in the petition for review. The appellate court may, however, direct the Commonwealth to file an answer.
(h) Pa.R.A.P. 1531—1571 do not apply to petitions for review filed under this rule. Pa.R.A.P. 1514 does apply, except that no copy of the petition needs to be served upon the Attorney General.
(i) Grant of petition for review and transmission of record.—If the petition for review is granted, the prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately give written notice of the entry of the order to the clerk of the trial court and to each party who has appeared in the appellate court. The grant of the petition for review shall operate as a stay of all trial court proceedings. The clerk of the trial court shall docket the notice in the same manner as a notice of appeal and shall mail that notice to all parties to the trial court proceeding. The certified record shall be transmitted and filed in accordance with Chapter 19 (preparation and transmission of the record and related matters). The times fixed by those provisions for transmitting the record shall run from the date of the entry of the order granting the petition for review. No party needs to file a separate notice of appeal.
(j) Denial of petition for review.—If the petition for review is denied, the prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately give written notice of the order to the clerk of the trial court and to each party who has appeared in the appellate court.
Official Note: The trial court's determination and the procedure for determining a motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds is set forth in Pa.R.Crim.P. 587. If a trial court denies such a motion without expressly finding that the motion is frivolous, the order is immediately appealable by means of a notice of appeal under Pa.R.A.P. 313. If, however, the trial court finds the motion to be frivolous, appellate review can be secured only if the appellate court grants a petition for review. See Commonwealth v. Orie, 22 A.3d 1021 (Pa. 2011); Commonwealth v. Brady, 510 Pa. 336, 508 A.2d 286 (1986). If the Superior Court does not grant the petition for review, the defendant may file a petition for allowance of appeal with the Supreme Court.
Where the petition for review of the determination of frivolousness is granted, the grant automatically initiates a separate appeal on the merits from the order denying the pretrial motion seeking dismissal of criminal charges on double jeopardy grounds.
A party may seek (or a court may sua sponte issue) a stay of the trial court proceedings pending review of the frivolousness determination. Otherwise, the trial court may proceed while the petition for review is pending. See Pa.R.A.P. 1701(d). Where the petition for review of the determination of frivolousness is granted, the grant automatically stays further proceedings in the trial courts.]
Official Note: Pa.R.A.P. 1573 formerly provided for review of orders in which the court finds an assertion of double jeopardy frivolous. The substance of the rule is now found in Pa.R.A.P. 1311.
(Editor's Note: The following chapter is new and printed in regular type to enhance readability.)
CHAPTER 16. SPECIALIZED REVIEW IN GENERAL
Rule
1601. Scope of Chapter. 1602. Filing. 1603. Form and Content. 1604. Service. 1605. Response to Petition. 1606. Further Review. SPECIFIC PETITIONS FOR SPECIALIZED REVIEW
1610. Review of Bail Orders. 1611. Review of Special Prosecution Orders. 1612. Review of Out-of-Home Placement in Juvenile Delinquency. 1613. Petition for Specialized Review under the Abortion Control Act.
IN GENERAL Rule 1601. Scope of Chapter.
This chapter provides a petition procedure for appellate review of certain discrete issues. Generally these matters are ancillary and/or preliminary to appellate review under Chapters 9, 11, 13, or 15, but the chapter also is intended to provide the method for initiating any form of appellate review that does not fall within those chapters.
The procedure applicable under this chapter is provided in Pa.R.A.P. 1602—1605, unless otherwise prescribed by statute or rule relating to a particular category of petition for specialized review.
Official Note: Judicial review of government unit actions or inactions not otherwise permitted under Chapters 9, 11, 13 or 15, including those enumerated in Pa.R.A.P. 1601, is available under Chapter 16; the document that initiates the case under Chapter 16 is called a petition for specialized review. The ''residuary'' initiating document function previously assigned to Chapter 15 is now assigned to Chapter 16.
Rule 1602. Filing.
(a) Time for filing.—A petition for specialized review shall be filed with the prothonotary of the appellate court within 30 days after the entry of the order sought to be reviewed. The petition shall be deemed filed on the date mailed if the petitioner complies with the requirements set forth in paragraph (b).
(b) Deemed received on date of mailing.—If the petition for specialized review is transmitted to the prothonotary of the appellate court by means of first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail, the petition shall be deemed received by the prothonotary for the purposes of Pa.R.A.P. 121(a) on the date deposited in the United States mail, as shown on a United States Postal Service Form 3817 Certificate of Mailing, or other similar United States Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified.
The certificate of mailing or other similar Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified shall be cancelled by the Postal Service, shall show the docket number of the matter in the lower court or other government unit and shall be either enclosed with the petition or separately mailed to the prothonotary. Upon actual receipt of the petition for specialized review the prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately stamp it with the date of actual receipt. That date, or the date of earlier deposit in the United States mail as prescribed in this paragraph, shall constitute the date of filing, which date shall be shown on the docket.
The prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately note the appellate docket number assignment upon the petition and give written notice of the docket number assignment in person or by first class mail to the government unit or clerk of the lower court, to the petitioner and to the other persons named in the proof of service accompanying the petition.
(c) Fee.—The petitioner, upon filing the petition for specialized review, shall pay any fee therefor prescribed by Chapter 27.
(d) Entry of appearance.—Upon the filing of the petition for specialized review, the prothonotary of the appellate court shall note on the record as counsel for the petitioner the name of counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for specialized review, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The prothonotary shall upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed at any time within 30 days after filing of the petition, strike off or correct the record of appearance. Thereafter a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
Rule 1603. Form and Content.
(a) Caption and parties.—All parties to the proceeding in the trial court or other government unit other than the petitioner shall be named as respondents.
(b) Title.—If the petition for specialized review is filed pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1610—1613, the title of the petition shall include a reference to the specific rule invoked.
(c) Content.—The petition for specialized review need not be set forth in numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, and shall contain the following (which shall, insofar as practicable, be set forth in the order stated):
(1) a statement of the basis for the jurisdiction of the appellate court.
(2) the name of the party or person seeking review.
(3) the text of the order in question, and the date of its entry. If the order is voluminous, it may, if more convenient, be appended to the petition. If the petition seeks review of a deemed denial, it should so state.
(4) a concise statement of the case containing the facts necessary to an understanding of the issue(s) presented.
(5) the question(s) presented, expressed in the terms and circumstances of the case but without unnecessary detail.
(6) a concise statement of the reasons why the lower court or other government unit erred.
(7) a copy of any opinions relating to the order sought to be reviewed, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, as well as a copy of any other record documents necessary to the appellate court's review.
(d) Supporting brief.—No supporting brief is permitted or required; the petition for specialized review shall present all contentions and arguments relied on with accuracy, brevity, and clarity.
(e) Length.—A petition for specialized review shall not exceed 9,000 words. A petition for specialized review that does not exceed 20 pages when produced by a word processor or typewriter shall be deemed to meet the 9,000 word limit. In all other cases, the attorney or the unrepresented filing party shall include a certification that the petition complies with the word count limit. The certificate may be based on the word count of the word processing system used to prepare the brief.
Rule 1604. Service.
A copy of the petition for specialized review shall be served by the petitioner on the trial court or other government unit that made the determination sought to be reviewed. In matters involving the Commonwealth, the petitioner shall similarly serve a copy upon the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. All parties before the trial court or other government unit shall be served in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 121(b).
Rule 1605. Response to Petition.
(a) Time for filing.—A party may file and serve a response to a petition for specialized review within 30 days of service of the petition. The response shall be deemed filed on the date of mailing if first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail is utilized.
(b) Content.—The response, which need not be set forth in numbered paragraphs in the manner of a pleading, shall set forth any procedural, substantive, or other argument or ground why the relief requested should be denied and shall comply with the length limitation and the other provisions of Pa.R.A.P. 1603 to the extent applicable. No separate motion to dismiss a petition for specialized review will be received. A party entitled to file a response under this rule who does not intend to do so shall, within the time fixed by these rules for filing a response, file a letter stating that a response to the petition for specialized review will not be filed. The failure to file a response will not be construed as concurrence in the petition for specialized review.
Rule 1606. Further Review.
A party wishing to seek review in the Supreme Court of a final order of an intermediate appellate court on a petition for specialized review must file a timely petition for allowance of appeal.
SPECIFIC PETITIONS FOR SPECIALIZED REVIEW Rule 1610. Review of Bail Orders.
Where the trial court enters an order under Pa.R.A.P. 1762(b) granting or denying release or modifying the conditions of release before sentence, a party may seek review of that order by filing a petition for specialized review in the appellate court that would have jurisdiction over the appeal from the judgment of sentence.
Official Note: See Pa.R.A.P. 1762(a) and Pa.R.A.P. 1762(e).
Rule 1611. Review of Special Prosecution Orders.
(a) General rule.—Within ten days after the entry of the order sought to be reviewed, a petition for specialized review may be filed in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania seeking review of the following orders:
(1) An order relating to the supersession of a district attorney by an Attorney General or by a court, or to the appointment, supervision, administration or operation of a special prosecutor.
(2) An order relating to the convening or discharge of an investigating grand jury or otherwise affecting its existence.
(3) An order entered in connection with the supervision, administration, or operation of an investigating grand jury or otherwise directly affecting an investigating grand jury or any investigation conducted by it.
(4) An order enforcing or refusing to enforce a subpoena issued by or otherwise affecting the existence or operation of any investigating committee of the General Assembly.
(5) An order of the type specified in subparagraphs (1) through (4) of this paragraph which contains a statement by the lower court pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b). Chapter 13 shall not be applicable to such an order.
Seven copies of any filings under this rule shall be filed with the original. Pa.R.A.P. 3309 shall not be applicable to an order reviewable under this rule.
(b) Opinion and record.—The Supreme Court on its own initiative may direct that the lower court comply with Pa.R.A.P. 1925 or that the record be otherwise corrected or supplemented.
(c) Distribution and disposition.—Upon receipt of the last filing that a party is entitled to make under this rule, the filings shall be distributed by the Prothonotary to the Supreme Court for its consideration. The Supreme Court may thereafter dispose of the petition or set it down for argument.
(d) Interlocutory matters.—The interlocutory or final nature of an order shall not be affected by this rule and, unless independent grounds appear for the review of an interlocutory order, the interlocutory nature of the order will be a sufficient reason for denying the petition. The denial of a petition shall be deemed a disposition on the merits unless otherwise ordered or unless the petition expressly seeks permission to appeal from an interlocutory order and asserts no other basis of jurisdiction on appeal.
(e) Remand of record.—Unless otherwise ordered:
(1) A certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court and the opinion of the court, if one has been filed, shall be transmitted to the lower court forthwith upon entry, notwithstanding the pendency of any application for reargument or other proceeding affecting the judgment. This transmission shall be in lieu of the remand of the record.
(2) Such transmission shall operate to vacate any order theretofore entered pursuant to Chapter 17.
Official Note: This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for Supreme Court supervision of special prosecutions and investigations, for example orders of the supervising judge of an investigating grand jury, findings of contempt (whether civil or criminal) by witnesses called before such a grand jury, etc. Pa.R.A.P. 702(c) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(5) vest jurisdiction over such matters in the Supreme Court. However, this rule is not applicable to review of investigating grand jury issues that collaterally arise in a plenary criminal prosecution initiated by complaint, information, or indictment. This rule requires that review be sought within ten days. Essentially the procedure is analogous to the review of a bail order under Pa.R.A.P. 1762. There is no delay for certification of the record, oral argument is ordinarily not available, and the matter is ready for final disposition by the Supreme Court immediately upon completion of the briefing schedule.
The term ''investigating grand jury'' in paragraph (a) includes a ''multicounty investigating grand jury'' convened under 42 Pa.C.S. § 4544. The ''independent grounds'' referred to in paragraph (d) include grounds for relief in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, etc. and cases where the order is reviewable under the standards of 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b).
Failure to petition for specialized review under this rule from an interlocutory order will ordinarily not constitute a waiver of objections to the order because, except as prescribed by Pa.R.A.P. 311(g)(1)(ii), there is no requirement under these rules that a party seek available interlocutory relief.
Under Pa.R.A.P. 1702(a), the Supreme Court or a justice thereof will not entertain an application for relief under Pa.R.A.P. 1781 in connection with a special prosecution or investigation order until a petition for specialized review has been filed under this rule.
Rule 1612. Review of Out-of-Home Placement in Juvenile Delinquency.
(a) General rule.—If a court under the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 et seq., enters an order after an adjudication of delinquency of a juvenile pursuant to Pa.R.J.C.P. 409(A)(2) and 515, which places the juvenile in an out-of-home overnight placement in any agency or institution that shall provide care, treatment, supervision, or rehabilitation of the juvenile, the juvenile may file a petition for specialized review. The petition shall be filed within ten days of the order.
(b) Content.—A petition for specialized review under paragraph (a) shall contain: (i) a specific description of any determinations made by the juvenile court; (ii) the matters complained of; (iii) a concise statement of the reasons why the juvenile court abused its discretion in ordering the out-of-home placement; (iv) the proposed terms and conditions of an alternative disposition for the juvenile; and (v) a request that the official court reporter for the juvenile court transcribe the notes of testimony as required by paragraph (g) of this rule. The cover page of the petition shall contain an endorsement in bold letters identifying the petition for specialized review as seeking expedited review of out-of-home placement in a juvenile delinquency matter. Any order(s) and opinion(s) relating to the out-of-home placement and the transcript of the juvenile court's findings shall be attached as appendices. The petition shall be supported by a certificate of counsel to the effect that it is presented in good faith and not for delay.
(c) Scope of review.
(1) The reviewing court shall not consider any challenge to the juvenile court's selection of a specific agency or specific institution as the site of the out-of-home placement and instead may consider only a challenge to the fact that the placement is out-of-home.
(2) The reviewing court shall not consider any challenge to the underlying adjudication of delinquency.
(d) Response.—Any response shall be filed within ten days of service of the petition, and no other pleading is authorized.
(e) Service.—A copy of the petition for specialized review and any answer thereto shall be served on the judge of the juvenile court and the official court reporter for the juvenile court. All parties in the juvenile court shall be served in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 121.
(f) Opinion of juvenile court.—Upon receipt of a copy of a petition for specialized review under paragraph (a), if the judge who made the disposition of the out-of-home placement did not state the reasons for such placement on the record at the time of disposition pursuant to Pa.R.J.C.P. 512(D), the judge shall file of record a brief statement of the reasons for the determination or where in the record such reasons may be found, within five days of service of the petition for specialized review.
(g) Transcription of Notes of Testimony.—Upon receipt of a copy of a petition for specialized review under paragraph (a), the court reporter shall transcribe the notes of testimony and deliver the transcript to the juvenile court within five business days. If the transcript is not prepared and delivered in a timely fashion, the juvenile court shall order the court reporter to transcribe the notes and deliver the notes to the juvenile court, and may impose sanctions for violation of such an order. If the juvenile is proceeding in forma pauperis, the juvenile shall not be charged for the cost of the transcript.
(h) Non-waiver of objection to placement.—A failure to seek review under this rule of the out-of-home placement shall not constitute a waiver of the juvenile's right to seek review of the placement in a notice of appeal filed by the juvenile from a disposition after an adjudication of delinquency.
Official Note: This rule provides a mechanism for the expedited review of an order of out-of-home placement entered pursuant to Pa.R.J.C.P. 515. Pa.R.J.C.P. 512(D) requires the judge who made the disposition of an out-of-home placement to place the reasons for the out-of-home placement on the record at the time of the disposition, and paragraph (f) of this rule is applicable only in the exceptional circumstance where the judge who made the disposition of an out-of-home placement fails to comply with Pa.R.J.C.P. 512(D). The Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6352, sets forth the considerations for a dispositional order following an adjudication of delinquency and the alternatives for disposition. The standard for review of a dispositional order is an abuse of discretion. See In the Interest of A.D., 771 A.2d 45 (Pa. Super. 2001) (en banc).
Rule 1613. Petition for Specialized Review under the Abortion Control Act.
See Chapter 38. The procedures set forth in Pa.R.A.P. 1602—05 do not apply.
CHAPTER 17. EFFECT OF APPEALS; SUPERSEDEAS AND STAYS
IN GENERAL Rule 1701. Effect of Appeal Generally.
(a) General rule.—Except as otherwise prescribed by these rules, after an appeal is taken or review of a quasijudicial order is sought, the trial court or other government unit may no longer proceed further in the matter.
(b) Authority of a trial court or [agency] other government unit after appeal.—After an appeal is taken or review of a quasijudicial order is sought, the trial court or other government unit may:
(1) Take such action as may be necessary to preserve the status quo, correct formal errors in papers relating to the matter, cause the record to be transcribed, approved, filed, and transmitted, grant leave to appeal in forma pauperis, grant supersedeas, and take other action permitted or required by these rules or otherwise ancillary to the appeal or petition for review proceeding.
(2) Enforce any order entered in the matter, unless the effect of the order has been superseded as prescribed in this chapter.
(3) Grant reconsideration of the order which is the subject of the appeal or petition, if:
(i) an application for reconsideration of the order is filed in the trial court or other government unit within the time provided or prescribed by law; and
(ii) an order expressly granting reconsideration of such prior order is filed in the trial court or other government unit within the time prescribed by these rules for the filing of a notice of appeal or petition for review of a quasijudicial order with respect to such order, or within any shorter time provided or prescribed by law for the granting of reconsideration.
A timely order granting reconsideration under this paragraph shall render inoperative any such notice of appeal or petition for review of a quasijudicial order theretofore or thereafter filed or docketed with respect to the prior order. The petitioning party shall and any party may file a praecipe with the prothonotary of any court in which such an inoperative notice or petition is filed or docketed and the prothonotary shall note on the docket that such notice or petition has been stricken under this rule. Where a timely order of reconsideration is entered under this paragraph, the time for filing a notice of appeal or petition for review begins to run anew after the entry of the decision on reconsideration, whether or not that decision amounts to a reaffirmation of the prior determination of the trial court or other government unit. No additional fees shall be required for the filing of the new notice of appeal or petition for review.
(4) Authorize the taking of depositions or the preservation of testimony where required in the interest of justice.
(5) Take any action directed or authorized on application by the appellate court.
(6) Proceed further in any matter in which a non-appealable interlocutory order has been entered, notwithstanding the filing of a notice of appeal or a petition for review of the order.
(c) Limited to matters in dispute.—Where only a particular item, claim, or assessment adjudged in the matter is involved in an appeal, or in a petition for review proceeding relating to a quasijudicial order, the appeal or petition for review proceeding shall operate to prevent the trial court or other government unit from proceeding further with only such item, claim, or assessment, unless otherwise ordered by the trial court or other government unit or by the appellate court or a judge thereof as necessary to preserve the rights of the appellant.
(d) [Certain] Original jurisdiction petitions for review.—The filing of [a] an original jurisdiction petition for review [(except a petition relating to a quasijudicial order)] shall not affect the power or authority of the government unit to proceed further in the matter, but the government unit shall be subject to any orders entered by the appellate court or a judge thereof pursuant to this chapter.
(e) Petitions for specialized review—The filing of a petition for specialized review under Chapter 16 shall not affect the power or authority of the trial court or other government unit to proceed further in the matter, but the provisions of this chapter relating to supersedeas of the order of the trial court or other government unit shall apply.
Official Note: The following statutory provisions relate to supersedeas generally:
42 Pa.C.S. § 702(c) (supersedeas) provides that, except as otherwise prescribed by general rule, a petition for permission to appeal under that section shall not stay the proceedings before the [lower] trial court or other government unit, unless the [lower] trial court or other government unit or the appellate court or a judge thereof shall so order. See also [Rule 1313 (effect of filing petition)] Pa.R.A.P. 1313.
42 Pa.C.S. § 5105(e) (supersedeas) provides that an appeal shall operate as a supersedeas to the extent and upon the conditions provided or prescribed by law, and that unless a supersedeas is entered, no appeal from an order concerning the validity of a will or other instrument or the right to the possession of or to administer any real or personal property shall suspend the powers or prejudice the acts of the appointive judicial officer, personal representative, or other person acting thereunder.
[Subdivision] Paragraph (a) codifies a well-established principle. See [e.g.], for example, Merrick Estate, [432 Pa. 450, 454,] 247 A.2d 786, 787 (Pa. 1968); Corace v. Balint, [418 Pa. 262, 275-76,] 210 A.2d 882, 889 (Pa. 1965). [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 5102 saves the provisions of Section 426 of the Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act [(] (77 P.S. § 871[)], which permit a rehearing by the agency under certain circumstances during the pendency of an appeal. [Rule 311(h) (further proceedings in lower court)] Pa.R.A.P. 311(h) provides that [Subdivision] paragraph (a) is not applicable where an appeal as of right is taken from interlocutory orders relating to attachments, custodianships, receiverships, and injunctions, [etc., thus making clear that the procedure for seeking appellate review of these collateral matters does not impair the power of the lower court to continue with the case proper] and that when such matters are appealed, the trial court may nonetheless proceed with the underlying case.
[Subdivision] Subparagraph (b)(1) sets forth an obvious power of the [lower] trial court or [agency] other government unit under these rules to take actions to preserve the status quo and to clarify or correct an order or verdict. The power to clarify or correct does not extend to substantive modifications. Pa. Indus. Energy Coalition v. [Pennsylvania] Pa. PUC, 653 A.2d 1336, 1344-45 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995), aff'd, [543 Pa. 307,] 670 A.2d 1152 (Pa. 1996). Examples of permissible actions to preserve the status quo are those ''auxiliary to the appellate process, such as a supersedeas or injunction.'' Id. Examples of permissible corrections are ''non-substantial technical amendments to an order, changes in the form of a decree, and modification of a verdict to add prejudgment interest.'' Id. at 1344. ''Such actions have no effect on the appeal or petition for review and cannot prompt a new appealable issue.'' Id. at 1345.
Among the permissible ''corrections'' is the addition or modification of contractual or statutory prejudgment interest, which is an element of contract damages. In such cases, the award of such interest is mandatory and not discretionary. TruServ Corp. v. Morgan's Tool & Supply Co. Inc., [__ Pa. __ ,] 39 A.3d 253, 264 (Pa. 2012). Accordingly, even though the amount of a verdict is changed by the addition of prejudgment interest, the verdict has been ''corrected'' and not ''modified.''
The Supreme Court has held that, so long as a motion for attorneys' fees has been timely filed, a trial court may act on that motion under [subdivision] subparagraph (b)(1) even after an appeal has been taken. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors Am., Inc., [613 Pa. 371,] 34 A.3d 1, 48 (Pa. 2011). Thus, unlike the court actions discussed in [Pa. Indus.] Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition, an award of attorneys' fees constitutes a separately appealable order that would be reviewable upon filing of a timely separate notice of appeal, measured from the date the fee award order was entered.
Generally an appeal does not operate as a supersedeas of an order of a government [agency action] unit.
[Subdivision] Subparagraph (b)(3) is intended to [handle] address the troublesome question of the effect of an application for reconsideration on the appeal process. [The rule (1) permits the trial court or other government unit to grant reconsideration if action is taken during the applicable appeal period, which is not intended to include the appeal period for cross appeals, or, during any shorter applicable reconsideration period under the practice below, and (2) eliminates the possibility that the power to grant reconsideration could be foreclosed by the taking of a ''snap'' appeal. The better procedure under this rule will be for a party seeking reconsideration to file an application for reconsideration below and a notice of appeal, etc. If the application lacks merit the trial court or other government unit may deny the application by the entry of an order to that effect or by inaction. The prior appeal paper will remain in effect, and appeal will have been taken without the necessity to watch the calendar for the running of the appeal period. If the trial court or other government unit fails to enter an order ''expressly granting reconsideration'' (an order that ''all proceedings shall stay'' will not suffice) within the time prescribed by these rules for seeking review, Subdivision (a) becomes applicable and the power of the trial court or other government unit to act on the application for reconsideration is lost.] By statute, a trial court has only 30 days from the entry of a final order to ''modify or rescind'' its order. 42 Pa.C.S. § 5505; see also Key Automotive Equip. Specialists v. Abernethy, 636 A.2d 1126, 1129 (Pa. Super. 1994) (recognizing that the statute does not apply to limit reconsideration of interlocutory orders). Under this rule, an express determination by a trial court or other government unit within 30 days that it is reconsidering its earlier order satisfies the statutory requirement; the trial court or other government unit does not need to grant the relief sought in the application for reconsideration within the 30 days. The 30-day period protects against the risk that someone could take a ''snap'' appeal and foreclose reconsideration, but, because the clock is running on the appeal period and the period for reconsideration simultaneously, filing the notice of appeal at the same time as or shortly after the motion for reconsideration will protect against waiver of the appeal if the trial court or other government unit fails to act.
[Subdivision] Subparagraph (b)(3) provides that: ''(W)here a timely order of reconsideration is entered under this paragraph, the time for filing a notice of appeal or petition for review begins to run anew after entry of the decision on reconsideration.'' Pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1930.2, [effective July 1, 1994, where] if reconsideration from a domestic relations order has been timely granted, a reconsidered decision or an order directing additional testimony must be entered within 120 days of the entry of the order granting reconsideration or the motion shall be deemed denied. See Pa.R.C.P. 1930.2(c), (d), and (e). The date from which the appeal period will be measured following a reconsidered decision in a domestic relations matter is governed by Pa.R.C.P. 1930.2(d) and (e).
[Under the 1996 amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure governing post-sentence practice, see Pa.R.Crim.P. 720 and 721, reconsideration of a decision on a defendant's post-sentence motion or on a Commonwealth motion to modify sentence must take place within the time limits set by those rules, and the judge may not vacate sentence or ''grant reconsideration'' pursuant to subdivision (b)(3) in order to extend the time limits for disposition of those motions. The amendments to Pa.R.Crim.P. 720 and new Pa.R.Crim.P. 721 resolve questions raised about the interplay between this subdivision and post-trial criminal practice. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Corson, 444 A.2d 170 (Pa. Super, 1982).]
Pa.R.Crim.P. 720 and 721 set fixed times for reconsideration of a decision on a defendant's post-sentence motion or on a Commonwealth motion to modify sentence, and reconsideration of a deemed denial is prohibited. The judge may not vacate sentence or ''grant reconsideration'' pursuant to subdivision (b)(3) in order to extend the time limits for disposition of those motions.
Paragraphs (d) and (e) explain that original jurisdiction petitions for review and petitions for specialized review do not come within Pa.R.A.P. 1701; accordingly, any stay or supersedeas must be sought under other provisions of Chapter 17.
Rule 1702. Stay Ancillary to Appeal.
(a) General rule.—Applications for relief under this chapter will not be entertained by an appellate court or a judge thereof until after a notice of appeal has been filed in the [lower court and docketed in the appellate court] trial court or a petition for review or petition for specialized review has been filed.
(b) Proceedings on petition for allowance of [or] appeal, petition for permission to appeal, or petition for specialized review.—Applications for relief under this chapter may be made without the prior filing of a petition for allowance of appeal [or], petition for permission to appeal, or petition for specialized review, but the failure to effect timely filing of such a petition, or the denial of such a petition, shall automatically vacate any ancillary order entered under this chapter. In such a case, the clerk of the court in which the ancillary order was entered shall, on praecipe of any party to the matter, enter a formal order under this rule vacating such ancillary order.
(c) Supreme Court review of appellate court supersedeas and stay determinations.—No appeal, petition for allowance of appeal [or], petition for review, or petition for specialized review need be filed in the Supreme Court in connection with [a reapplication under Rule 3315 (review of stay orders of appellate courts)] an application under Pa.R.A.P. 3315.
Official Note: [Based on former Superior Court Rule 53 and Commonwealth Court Rule 112A, which required the taking of an appeal prior to an application for supersedeas or other interlocutory order. Subdivision (b) is new and is added in recognition of the fact that the drafting of a petition for allowance of appeal or a petition for permission to appeal in the form required by these rules may not be possible prior to the time when an application for supersedeas may have to be made in the appellate court in order to avoid substantial harm.] In any instance in which a party seeks a stay or supersedeas from a trial court or government unit, that party can seek relief from the appellate court that has jurisdiction of the matter and can seek review of that intermediate appellate court's decision from the Supreme Court.
Rule 1704. Application in a Capital Case for a Stay of Execution or for Review of an Order Granting or Denying a Stay of Execution.
Prior notice of the intent to file an application in a capital case for a stay or review of an order granting or denying a stay of execution shall be provided to the Prothonotary of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, if prior notice is practicable.
The application for stay or review shall set forth the following:
1. The date the warrant issued; the date and nature of the order that prompted the issuance of the warrant; and the date the execution is scheduled, if a date has been set;
2. Whether any direct or collateral challenges to the underlying conviction are pending, and, if so, in what court(s) or tribunal(s);
3. Whether any other applications for a stay of the pending execution have been filed, and, if so, in what court(s) or tribunal(s), when, and the status of the application(s);
4. The grounds for relief and the showing made to the trial court of entitlement to a stay under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(c), if applicable;
5. A statement certifying that emergency action is required and setting forth a description of the emergency.
All dockets, pleadings, and orders that are referred to in 1—5 above must be attached to the application. If any of the information provided in the application changes while the motion is pending, the party seeking the stay or review must file with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court written notice of the change within 24 hours.
No notice of appeal [or], petition for review, or petition for specialized review needs to be filed in order to file an application under this rule.
STAY IN CRIMINAL MATTERS Rule 1762. Release in Criminal Matters.
(a) Bail when an appeal is pending.—Applications relating to bail when an appeal is pending shall ordinarily first be presented to the [lower court,] trial court and shall be governed by the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure. If the [lower] trial court denies relief, a party may seek relief in the appellate court by filing an application, pursuant to [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 123, ancillary to the pending appeal.
(b) Bail when no appeal is pending.—Applications relating to bail when no appeal is pending:
(1) Applications relating to bail when no appeal is pending shall first be presented to the [lower court,] trial court and shall be governed by the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(2) An order relating to bail shall be subject to review pursuant to Chapter [15 (judicial review of governmental determinations)] 16. [Any answer shall be in accordance with Rule 1516 (other pleadings allowed), and no other pleading is authorized. Rule 1517 (applicable rules of pleading) and Rule 1531 (intervention) through 1551 (scope of review) shall not be applicable to a petition for review filed under this paragraph.
(c) Content. An application for relief under subdivision (a) or a petition for review under subdivision (b) shall set forth specifically and clearly the matters complained of and a description of any determinations made by the lower court. Any order and opinions relating to the bail determination shall be attached as appendices.
(d) Service. A copy of the application for relief or the petition for review and any answer thereto shall be served on the judge of the lower court. All parties in the lower court shall be served in accordance with Rule 121(b) (service of all papers required). The Attorney General of Pennsylvania need not be served in accordance with Rule 1514(c) (service), unless the Attorney General is a party in the lower court.
(e)] (c) Entry of Bail.—Bail shall be entered in the [lower] trial court pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.
[(f)] (d) Extradition matters.—Relief relating to bail in extradition matters shall be governed by the procedures prescribed by this rule.
[(g)] (e) Opinion of [lower] trial court.—Upon receipt of a copy of an application for relief under [subdivision] paragraph (a) or a petition for specialized review under [subdivision] paragraph (b) that does not include an explanation for the bail determination, the judge who made the bail determination [below] being reviewed shall forthwith file of record a brief statement of the reasons for the determination or where in the record such reasons may be found.
[Official Note: Prior to sentence, Rule 1702 (stay ancillary to appeal) is satisfied by the filing of a plenary petition for review of the order of the lower court granting or denying release. After sentence a separate plenary filing is no longer necessary because the application for release pending appeal may be made as a matter ancillary to the appeal from the order imposing sentence.
The reference in Subdivision (c) to the rulings complained of is not intended to suggest that the appellate court may ignore objective standards for release such as those established by Pa.R.Crim.P. 530.]
[REVIEW OF DISPOSITIONAL ORDER FOR OUT OF HOME PLACEMENT IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY MATTERS] Rule 1770. [Review of Out of Home Placement in Juvenile Delinquency Matters] (Rescinded).
[(a) General rule. If a court under the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 et seq., enters an order after an adjudication of delinquency of a juvenile pursuant to Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure 409(A)(2) and 515, which places the juvenile in an out of home overnight placement in any agency or institution that shall provide care, treatment, supervision or rehabilitation of the juvenile (''Out of Home Placement''), the juvenile may seek review of that order pursuant to a petition for review under Chapter 15 (judicial review of governmental determinations). The petition shall be filed within ten days of the said order.
(b) Content. A petition for review under subdivision (a) shall contain: (i) a specific description of any determinations made by the juvenile court; (ii) the matters complained of; (iii) a concise statement of the reasons why the juvenile court abused its discretion in ordering the Out of Home Placement; (iv) the proposed terms and conditions of an alternative disposition for the juvenile; and (v) a request that the official court reporter for the juvenile court transcribe the notes of testimony as required by subdivision (g) of this Rule. Any order(s) and opinion(s) relating to the Out of Home Placement and the transcript of the juvenile court's findings shall be attached as appendices. The petition shall be supported by a certificate of counsel to the effect that it is resented in good faith and not for delay.
(c) Objection to specific agency or institution, or underlying adjudication of delinquency, is not permitted.
(1) A petition for review under subdivision (a) shall not challenge the specific agency or specific institution that is the site of the Out of Home Placement and instead shall be limited to the Out of Home Placement itself.
(2) A petition for review under subdivision (a) shall not challenge the underlying adjudication of delinquency.
(d) Answer. Any answer shall be filed within ten days of service of the petition, and no other pleading is authorized. Rule 1517 (applicable rules of pleading) and Rule 1531 (intervention) through 1551 (scope of review) shall not be applicable to a petition for review filed under subdivision (a).
(e) Service. A copy of the petition for review and any answer thereto shall be served on the judge of the juvenile court and the official court reporter for the juvenile court. All parties in the juvenile court shall be served in accordance with Rule 121(b) (service of all papers required). The Attorney General of Pennsylvania need not be served in accordance with Rule 1514(c) (service), unless the Attorney General is a party in the juvenile court.
(f) Opinion of juvenile court. Upon receipt of a copy of a petition for review under subdivision (a), if the judge who made the disposition of the Out of Home Placement did not state the reasons for such placement on the record at the time of disposition pursuant to Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 512 (D), the judge shall file of record a brief statement of the reasons for the determination or where in the record such reasons may be found, within five days of service of the petition for review.
(g) Transcription of Notes of Testimony. Upon receipt of a copy of a petition for review under subdivision (a), the court reporter shall transcribe the notes of testimony and deliver the transcript to the juvenile court within five business days. If the transcript is not prepared and delivered in a timely fashion, the juvenile court shall order the court reporter to transcribe the notes and deliver the notes to the juvenile court, and may impose sanctions for violation of such an order. If the juvenile is proceeding in forma pauperis, the juvenile shall not be charged for the cost of the transcript. Chapter 19 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure shall not otherwise apply to petitions for review filed under this Rule.
(h) Non-waiver of objection to placement. A failure to seek review under this rule of the Out of Home Placement shall not constitute a waiver of the juvenile's right to seek review of the placement in a notice of appeal filed by the juvenile from a disposition after an adjudication of delinquency.
Official Note: This Rule provides a mechanism for the expedited review of an order of Out of Home Placement entered pursuant to Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 515. Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 512(D) requires the judge who made the disposition of an Out of Home Placement to place the reasons for an Out of Home Placement on the record at the time of the disposition, and subdivision (f) of this Rule is only applicable in the exceptional circumstance where the judge who made the disposition of an Out of Home Placement fails to comply with Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 512(D). The Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6352, sets forth the considerations for a dispositional order following an adjudication of delinquency and the alternatives for disposition. The standard for review of a dispositional order is an abuse of discretion. See In the Interest of A.D., 771 A.2d 45 (Pa. Super. 2001) (en banc).]
Official Note: Pa.R.A.P. 1770 formerly provided for a petition for review of an out of home placement in juvenile delinquency matters. The substance of that rule is now found in Pa.R.A.P. 1612.
STAY PENDING ACTION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW Rule 1781. Stay Pending Action on Petition for Review or Petition for Specialized Review.
(a) Application to government unit.—Application for a stay or supersedeas of an order or other determination of any government unit pending review in an appellate court on petition for review or petition for specialized review shall ordinarily be made in the first instance to the government unit.
(b) Contents of application for stay or supersedeas.—An application for stay or supersedeas of an order or other determination of a government unit, or for an order granting an injunction pending review, or for relief in the nature of peremptory mandamus, may be made to the appellate court or to a judge thereof, but the application shall show that application to the government unit for the relief sought is not practicable, or that application has been made to the government unit and denied, with the reasons given by it for the denial, or that the action of the government unit did not afford the relief [which] that the applicant had requested. The application shall also show the reasons for the relief requested and the facts relied upon, and if the facts are subject to dispute, the application shall be supported by sworn or verified statements or copies thereof. With the application shall be filed such parts, if any, of the record as are relevant to the relief sought.
(c) Notice and action by court.—Upon such notice to the government unit as is required by [Rule 123 (applications for relief)] Pa.R.A.P. 123, the appellate court, or a judge thereof, may grant an order of stay or supersedeas, including the grant of an injunction pending review or relief in the nature of peremptory mandamus, upon such terms and conditions, including the filing of security, as the court or the judge thereof may prescribe. Where a statute requires that security be filed as a condition to obtaining a supersedeas, the court shall require adequate security.
CHAPTER 19. PREPARATION AND TRANSMISSION OF RECORD AND RELATED MATTERS
RECORD ON APPEAL FROM LOWER COURT Rule 1911. Request for Transcript.
(a) General rule.—The appellant shall request any transcript required under this chapter in the manner and make any necessary payment or deposit therefor in the amount and within the time prescribed by Rules 5000.1 et seq. of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration [(court reporters)].
(b) [Cross appeals] Cross-appeals.—Where a [cross appeal] cross-appeal has been taken [the cross appellant], the cross-appellant shall also have a duty to pay for and cause the transcript to be filed and shall share the initial expense equally with all other appellants.
(c) Form.—The order for transcript may be endorsed on, incorporated into, or attached to the notice of appeal or other document and shall be in substantially the following form:
(Caption) A (notice of appeal) (petition for review) (petition for specialized review) (other appellate paper, as appropriate) having been filed in this matter, the official court reporter is hereby ordered to produce, certify and file the transcript in this matter in conformity with Rule 1922 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure.
_________________
Signature(d) Effect of failure to comply.—If the appellant fails to take the action required by these rules and the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration for the preparation of the transcript, the appellate court may take such action as it deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal.
Official Note: The 1997 amendment changes the word ''order'' to ''request'' in order to clarify that an order of court is not necessary. See Pa.R.J.A. 5000.5 and [1997 amendment to Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 904(c). If a request for a transcript on appeal is made in open court, the appellant must nevertheless prepare and serve a written order for transcript, so that the district court administrator and the appellate court are aware of the order. Local rules contemplated by Pa.R.J.A. 5000.6 should be consulted as to the officer or other person who is to receive and hold any security deposit (up to one-half the estimated charge) required by the court reporter. It is the responsibility of the appellant to contact the court reporter to ascertain whether a deposit will be required and the amount thereof, and to make the deposit. The court reporter is under no obligation to proceed in the absence of a required deposit, and under Pa.R.J.A. 5000.11(b) is under no obligation to certify and file the transcript in the absence of full payment or adequate security therefor. While delay in payment, and any resulting delay in certification and filing of the transcript, does not automatically affect the validity of the appeal, under [Subdivision (d)] paragraph (d), the appellate court may impose other sanctions in an appropriate case. Compare [Rule 902 (manner of taking appeal) and Rule 2101 (conformance with requirements)] Pa.R.A.P. 902 with Pa.R.A.P. 2101. This rule and [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 1922 are ''another arrangement for delivery'' under Pa.R.J.A. 5000.11(a), since it is undesirable for the official appellate transcript to pass outside of the control of court officials.
CHAPTER 27. FEES AND COSTS IN APPELLATE COURTS AND ON APPEAL
FEES Rule 2702. Multiple Parties.
Where a joint notice of appeal is filed in the [lower court,] trial court or docketed in the appellate court, or a joint petition for allowance of appeal is filed under [Rule 512 (joint appeals)] Pa.R.A.P. 512, or a joint petition for review is filed under [Rule] Pa.R.A.P. 512 or otherwise, or a joint petition for permission to appeal is filed under [Rule 1312(e) (multiple petitioners), or] Pa.R.A.P. 1312(e), or a joint petition for specialized review is filed, or where any other filing under these rules is effected jointly as permitted by these rules, only one fee is payable, regardless of the number of parties to the filing.
Official Note: This rule abolishes the ''number of appellants times number of appellees'' practice [heretofore] previously followed in the computation of appellate filing fees.
ARTICLE III. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT
ORIGINAL MATTERS Rule 3307. Applications for Leave to File Original Process.
(a) Scope.—This rule applies only to matters within the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under 42 Pa.C.S. § 721 [(original jurisdiction)] which are not in the nature of mandamus or prohibition ancillary to matters within the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Applications for relief pursuant to or ancillary to the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, including relief which may be obtained in the Supreme Court by petition for review or petition for specialized review, are governed by Article I [(preliminary provisions) and Article II (appellate procedure)] and Article II and may be filed without an application under this rule. See also [Rule 3309 (applications for extraordinary relief)] Pa.R.A.P. 3309.
(b) General rule.—The initial pleading in any original action or proceeding shall be prefaced by an application for leave to file such pleading, showing service upon all parties to such action or proceeding. The matter will be docketed when the application for leave to file is filed with the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court. The application shall be deemed filed on the date received by the prothonotary unless it was on an earlier date deposited in the United States mail and sent by first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail as shown on a United States Postal Service Form 3817 Certificate of Mailing or other similar United States Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified. The certificate of mailing or similar Postal Service form from which the date of deposit can be verified shall be cancelled by the Postal Service, shall show the docket number of the matter, if known, and shall be either enclosed with the application or separately mailed to the prothonotary. Appearances shall be filed as in other original actions. An adverse party may file an answer no later than 14 days after service of the application. The answer shall be deemed filed on the date of mailing if first class, express, or priority United States Postal Service mail is utilized. An adverse party who does not intend to file an answer to the application shall, within the time fixed by these rules for the filing of an answer, file a letter stating that an answer to the application will not be filed. Upon receipt of the answer to the application, or a letter stating that no answer will be filed, from each party entitled to file such, the application, pleadings, and answer to the application, if any, shall be distributed by the [Prothonotary] prothonotary to the Supreme Court for its consideration.
(c) Disposition of application.—The Supreme Court may thereafter grant or deny the application or set it down for argument. Additional pleadings may be filed, and subsequent proceedings had, as the Supreme Court may direct. If the application is denied, the matter shall be transferred to the appropriate court by the [Prothonotary] prothonotary in the same manner and with the same effect as matters are transferred under [Rule 751 (transfer of erroneously filed cases)] Pa.R.A.P. 751.
[Official Note: Based on U.S. Supreme Court Rule 9. Presumably this rule will seldom be invoked, since questions concerning the scope of the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may usually be avoided by filing the action in a lower court which clearly has subject matter jurisdiction, and immediately thereafter making application for transfer to the Supreme Court under Rule 3309 (applications for extraordinary relief).]
[REVIEW OF SPECIAL PROSECUTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS] Rule 3331. [Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations] (Reserved).
[(a) General rule.—Within the time specified in Rule 1512(b)(3) (special provisions), any of the following orders shall be subject to review pursuant to Chapter 15 (judicial review of governmental determinations):
(1) An order relating to the supersession of a district attorney by an Attorney General or by a court or to the appointment, supervision, administration or operation of a special prosecutor.
(2) An order relating to the convening or discharge of an investigating grand jury or otherwise affecting its existence.
(3) An order entered in connection with the supervision, administration or operation of an investigating grand jury or otherwise directly affecting an investigating grand jury or any investigation conducted by it.
(4) An order enforcing or refusing to enforce a subpoena issued by or otherwise affecting the existence or operation of any investigating committee of the General Assembly.
(5) An order of the type specified in Paragraphs (1) through (4) of this subdivision which contains a statement by the lower court pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission). Chapter 13 (interlocutory appeals by permission) shall not be applicable to such an order.
The petition shall conform to Rule 123(a) (contents of application for relief) and any answer to the petition shall conform to Rule 1516(a) (general rule). A party entitled to file an answer under this rule who does not intend to do so shall, within the time fixed by these rules for the filing of an answer, file a letter stating that an answer to the petition for review will not be filed. Rule 1517 (applicable rules of pleading) through Rule 1551 (scope of review) shall not be applicable to a petition for review filed under this rule. Seven copies of any papers filed under this rule shall be filed with the original. Rule 3309 (applications for extraordinary relief) shall not be applicable to an order reviewable under this rule.
(b) Briefs and record. The petitioner may file and serve a brief in support of the petition for review with the petition for review. Any other party may file and serve an answer and supporting brief within 14 days of service of the petition. Each party shall append to the petition or answer as much of the record below as the party desires to bring to the attention of the court. The Supreme Court on its own initiative may direct that the lower court comply with Rule 1925 (opinion in support of order) or that the record be otherwise corrected or supplemented.
(c) Distribution and disposition. Upon receipt of the last paper that a party is entitled to file under this rule, the papers filed under this rule shall be distributed by the Prothonotary to the Supreme Court for its consideration. The Supreme Court may thereafter dispose of the petition or set it down for argument.
(d) Interlocutory matters. The interlocutory or final nature of an order shall not be affected by this rule and, unless independent grounds appear for the review of an interlocutory order, the interlocutory nature of the order will be a sufficient reason for denying the petition. The denial of a petition shall be deemed a disposition on the merits unless otherwise ordered or unless the petition expressly seeks permission to appeal from an interlocutory order and asserts no other basis of jurisdiction on appeal.
(e) Remand of record. Unless otherwise ordered:
(1) A certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court and the opinion of the court, if one has been filed, shall be transmitted to the lower court forthwith upon entry, notwithstanding the pendency of any application for reargument or other proceeding affecting the judgment. This transmission shall be in lieu of the remand of the record.
(2) Such transmission shall operate to vacate any order theretofore entered pursuant to Chapter 17 (effect of appeals; supersedeas and stays).
Official Note: This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for Supreme Court supervision of special prosecutions and investigations, e.g. orders of the supervising judge of an investigating grand jury, findings of contempt (whether civil or criminal) by witnesses called before such a grand jury, etc. Rule 702(c) (supervision of special prosecutions or investigations) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(5) (direct appeals from courts of common pleas) vest jurisdiction over such matters in the Supreme Court. However, this rule is not applicable to review of investigating grand jury issues that collaterally arise in a plenary criminal prosecution initiated by complaint, information or indictment. Rule 1512(b)(3) (special provisions) requires that review be sought within ten days. Essentially the procedure is analogous to the review of a bail order under Rule 1762 (release in criminal matters). There is no delay for certification of the record, oral argument is ordinarily not available, and the matter is ready for final disposition by the Supreme Court immediately upon completion of the briefing schedule. The term ''investigating grand jury'' in Subdivision (a) includes a ''multicounty investigating grand jury'' convened under 42 Pa.C.S. § 4544 (convening multicounty investigating grand jury). The ''independent grounds'' referred to in Subdivision (d) include grounds for relief in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, etc. and cases where the order is reviewable under the standards of 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission). Failure to petition for review under this rule from an interlocutory order will ordinarily not constitute a waiver of objections to the order since, except as prescribed by Rule 311(g)(1)(ii) (Waiver of objections), there is no requirement under these rules that a party seek available interlocutory relief.
Under Rule 1702(a) (stay ancillary to appeal), the Supreme Court or a justice thereof will not entertain an application for relief under Rule 1781 (stay pending action on petition for review) in connection with a special prosecution or investigation order until a petition for review has been filed under this rule.]
Official Note: Pa.R.A.P. 3331 formerly provided for a petition for review of orders relating to special prosecutions or investigations. The substance of the rule is now found in Pa.R.A.P. 1611.
EXPLANATORY COMMENT There have been a number of documents that have been categorized as ''petitions for review'' over the years that are currently addressed in Chapter 15 but are neither traditional administrative agency appeals nor original jurisdiction actions against the Commonwealth.
As originally structured, Chapter 15 provided the procedure for obtaining judicial review of action or inaction of a ''government unit'' not otherwise available through a notice of appeal under Chapter 9, a petition for allowance of appeal under Chapter 11, or a petition for permission to appeal under Chapter 13. Since 1976 when Chapter 15 was adopted, most of the appellate court filings that utilize Chapter 15 have been, as intended, either traditional administrative agency appeals or original jurisdiction actions when an appellate court has jurisdiction.
The definition of ''government unit'' is broad enough, however, to encompass ''courts.'' Thus, under the current practice addressed by the proposed amendments, a Chapter 15 ''petition for review'' is the means by which a variety of other types of orders can be appealed. These other types of petitions for review involve discretionary review and the expedited review of certain court orders.
Petitions for review under Pa.R.A.P. 341(c), 1311(Note), and 1573 seek discretionary review and present only the question of whether to permit an appeal from an interlocutory order that is not appealable as of right. Thus, they are more procedurally similar to a petition for permission to appeal than an appeal. For that reason, the Committee proposes amending Chapter 13 to include each of these three.
Other petitions for review involve appellate review using specialized procedures, such as review of bail orders under Pa.R.A.P. 1762, review of special prosecution orders under Pa.R.A.P. 3331, and review of out-of-home-placement of minors under Pa.R.A.P. 1770. The Committee is proposing to place these requests for review in Chapter 16.
As a result of these changes, Chapter 15 will be limited. Chapter 15 will apply only to administrative agency appeals, certain other enumerated appeals, and original jurisdiction actions when an appellate court has jurisdiction. Judicial review of all other action or inaction of a ''government unit'' not otherwise available through Chapters 9, 11, 13 or reorganized Chapter 15, will now be in Chapter 16. Thus, the petition for specialized review becomes the mechanism for appealing orders that are not appealable under Chapters 9, 11, 13, or 15.
As a general principle, the proposed amendments to Chapters 13 and 15 and the adoption of new Chapter 16 do not alter existing procedures, but make those procedures easier to find. There are, however, a few clarifications that the Committee is incorporating into the proposed rules. The most significant of these clarifications is adoption of a single standard of review for granting discretionary review of an interlocutory order. Under existing practice, the standard of review for a Pa.R.A.P. 341(c) petition for review is ''abuse of discretion,'' but the description of a Pa.R.A.P. 1311(Note) petition for review refers to ''so egregious as to justify prerogative appellate correction.'' The Committee proposes that ''abuse of discretion'' be the appropriate standard for both.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 16-857. Filed for public inspection May 20, 2016, 9:00 a.m.]
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
