THE COURTS
[210 PA. CODE CHS. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15,
17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 33 AND 51]
Proposed Amendments to Pa.R.A.P. 121 et seq.; Recommendation 28
[26 Pa.B. 1988] The Appellate Court Rules Committee proposes to amend Rules 121, 123, 313, 341, 343, 752, 904, 906, 907, 1112, 1311, 1501, 1513, 1514, 1515, 1532, 1571, 1734, 1751, 1782, 1911, 2132, 2136, 2140, 2153, 2154, 2185, 2186, 2187, 2311, 2313, 2543, 2546, 3331, 5101 and 5102 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. The amendments are being submitted to the bench and bar for comments and suggestions prior to their submission to the Supreme Court.
All communications in reference to the proposed amendments should be sent not later than June 30, 1996 to Dean R. Phillips, Esquire, Counsel, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Exton Office Court, 300-F North Pottstown Pike, Exton, PA 19341.
The Explanatory Comment which appears in connection with the proposed amendments has been inserted by the Committee for the convenience of the bench and bar. It will not constitute part of the rules nor will it be officially adopted or promulgated by the Court.
By the Appellate Court Rules Committee
ROBERT L. BYER, ESQUIRE,
Chair
Annex A
TITLE 210. APPELLATE PROCEDURE
PART I. RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
ARTICLE I. PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
DOCUMENTS GENERALLY Rule 121. Filing and Service.
(a) Filing. Papers required or permitted to be filed in an appellate court shall be filed with the prothonotary. Filing may be accomplished by mail addressed to the prothonotary, but except as otherwise provided by these rules filing shall not be timely unless the papers are received by the prothonotary within the time fixed for filing. Paperbooks shall be deemed filed on the day ofmailing if first class mail is utilized. If an application under these rules requests relief which may be granted by a single judge, the judge in extraordinary circumstances may permit the application and any related papers to be filed with [him] that judge, in which event [he] that judge shall note thereon the date of filing and shall thereafter transmit such papers to the clerk.
(b) Service of all papers required. Copies of all papers filed by any party and not required by these rules to be served by the prothonotary shall, concurrently with their filing, be served by a party or person acting [for him] on behalf of that party or person on all other parties to the matter. Service on a party represented by counsel shall be made on [his] counsel.
* * * * * (e) Additional time after service by mail. Whenever a party is required or permitted to do an act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon [him] that party (other than an order of a court or other government unit) and the paper is served by mail, three days shall be added to the prescribed period.
* * * * * Rule 123. Application for Relief.
* * * * * (e) Power of single judge to entertrain applications. In addition to the authority expressly conferred by these rules or by law or rule of court, a single judge of an appellate court may entertain and may grant or deny any request for relief which under these rules may properly be sought by application, except that an appellate court may provide by order or rule of court that any application or class of applications must be acted upon by the court. The action of a single judge may be reviewed by the court except for actions of a single judge under Rule 3102(c)(2) (relating to a quorum in Commonwealth Court in any election matter).
______Official Note: The 1996 amendment precludes review by the Commonwealth Court of actions of a single judge in election matters. Based on former Supreme Court Rules 62, 63, and 66, former Superior Court Rules 53, 54, and 57, former Commonwealth Court Rule 112A and Pa.R.Crim.P. 304.
CHAPTER 3. ORDERS FROM WHICH APPEALS MAY BE TAKEN
INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS Rule 313. Collateral Orders.
* * * * * The Official Note to Rule 313 is rescinded and replaced with the following:
Official Note: Rule 313 is a codification of existing case law with respect to collateral orders. See Pugar v. Greco, 483 Pa. 68, 73, 394 A.2d 542, 545 (1978) (quoting Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Corp., 337 U. S. 541 (1949)). Examples of collateral orders include an order denying a pre-trial motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy, Commonwealth v. Brady, 510 Pa. 363, 508 A.2d 286, 289-91 (1986) (allowing an immediate appeal from denial of double jeopardy claim under collateral order doctrine where trial court makes a finding that motion is not frivolous); an order denying a petition to permit the payment of death taxes, Hankin v. Hankin, 338 Pa. Super. 442, 487 A.2d 1363 (1985); and an order denying a petition for removal of an executor, Re: Estate of Georgianna, 312 Pa. Super. 339, 458 A.2d 989 (1983), aff'd, 504 Pa. 510, 475 A.2d 744. Thorough discussions of the collateral order doctrine as it has been applied by Pennsylvania appellate courts are found in the following sources: Darlington, McKeon, Schuckers and Brown, 1 Pennsylvania Appellate Practice Second Edition, §§ 313:1--313:201 (1994) and Byer, Appealable orders under the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedures in Practice and Procedures in Pennsylvania Appellate Courts (PBI No. 1994-869); Pines, Pennsylvania Appellate Practice: Procedural Requirements and the Vagaries of Jurisdiction, 91 Dick. L. Rev. 55, 107--115 (1986). If an order falls under Rule 313, an immediate appeal may be taken as of right simply by filing a notice of appeal. The procedures set forth in Rules 341(c) and 1311 do not apply under Rule 313.
FINAL ORDERS Rule 341. Final Orders Generally.
* * * * * (b) Definition of Final Order. A final order is any order that:
(1) disposes of all claims [or] and of all parties; or
(2) any order that is expressly defined as a final order by statute; or
(3) any order entered as a final order pursuant to [subsection] subdivision (c) of this rule.
(c) Determination of finality. When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim or when multiple parties are involved, the trial court or other governmental unit may enter a final order as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims [or] and parties only upon an express determination that an immediate appeal would facilitate resolution of the entire case. Such an order becomes appealable when entered. In the absence of such a determination and entry of a final order, any order or other form of decision that adjudicates fewer than all the claims [or] and parties shall not constitute a final order.
(1) ***
(2) The trial court or other governmental unit is required to act on an application for a determination of a finality under subdivision (c) within 30 days of entry of the order. During the time an application for determination for finality is pending, the action will be stayed. Any denial of such an application shall be reviewable only for abuse of discretion pursuant to Chapter 15. Unless the trial court or other governmental unit acts on the application within 30 days after it is filed the trial court or other governmental unit shall no longer consider the application and it shall be deemed to have been denied.
* * * * * Official Note:
* * * * * Orders which are separable from and collateral to the main cause of action where the right involved is too important to be denied review, and the question presented is such that if review is postponed until final judgment in the case, the claim will be irreparably lost, previously appealable as final orders under Rule 341, are now appealable under Rule 313. See Pugar v. Greco, 483 Pa. 68, 73, 394 A.2d 543, 545 (1978) (quoting Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U. S. 541 (1949)).
* * * * * Orders formerly appealable under Rule 341 by the Commonwealth in criminal cases as heretofore provided by law, but which do not dispose of the entire case, are now appealable as interlocutory appeals as of right under Subdivision [(e)] (d) of Rule 311.
The 1996 amendments to subdivisions (a) and (c), substituting the conjunction ''and'' for ''or'' are not substantive. The amendments merely clarify that by definition any order which disposes of all claims will dispose of all parties and any order that disposes of all parties will dispose of all claims.
The 1996 amendment to subdivision (c)(2) provides for a deemed denial where the trial court or other governmental unit fails to act on the application within 30 days. Under such circumstances, a party may need to praecipe for entry of the deemed denial pursuant to Rule 301(d) to perfect an appeal.
Rule 343. [Order Determining Challenge to a Plea of Guilty.] Rescinded.
[If a timely motion has been filed pursuant to Rule 321 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure (challenge to guilty plea), any appeal taken as of right shall be from the final order disposing of such motion. Such timely motion shall have the effect, for the purposes of Rule 1701(b)(3) (authority of lower court or agency after appeal), of an order expressly granting reconsideration of the judgment previously entered on the plea of guilty.]
Official Note: [Pa.R.Crim.P. 321 provides a procedure whereby a timely motion challenging the validity of a plea of guilty, or the denial or a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty, shall be heard by the lower court. In such event, the time for filing an appeal from the judgment on the plea does not begin to run until such motion is decided by the lower court.
In the event an appeal from the judgment on a plea of guilty has been filed before a timely motion under Pa.R.Crim.P. 321 has been made, the filing of such motion acts as an automatic grant of reconsideration under Rule 1701(b)(3) (authority of lower court or agency after appeal), so as to render inoperative the prior appeal. In such event, an appeal could be filed anew after disposition of the Pa.R.Crim.P. 321 motion.]
The Supreme Court rescinded this Rule in 1996 as obsolete in view of the changes to the Rules of Criminal Procedure rescinding Pa.R.Crim.P. 321 and adopting new Pa.R.Crim.P. 1401, effective as to cases in which the determination of guilt occurs on or after January 1, 1994. See Criminal Procedural Rules Committee Final Report at 620--621 A.2d (Pennsylvania Reporter Series) pages CVIII--CXXXIII.
CHAPTER 7. COURTS TO WHICH APPEALS SHALL BE TAKEN
TRANSFERS OF CASES Rule 752. Transfers Between Superior and Commonwealth Courts.
* * * * * (b) Content of application; answer. The application shall contain a statement of the facts necessary to an understanding of the same or related questions of fact, law or discretion; a statement of the questions themselves; and a statement of the reasons why joint consideration of the appeals would be desirable. The application shall be served on all other parties to all appeals or other matters involved, and shall include or have annexed thereto a copy of each order from which any appeals involved were taken and any findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinions relating thereto. [Within seven days after service of the application any] Any other party to any appeal or other matter involved may file an answer in opposition in accordance with Rule 123(b). The application and answer shall be submitted without oral argument unless otherwise ordered.
ARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 9. APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS Rule 904. Content of the Notice of Appeal.
* * * * * (c) [Order] Request for transcript. The [order] request for transcript [, if any,] contemplated by Rule 1911 (order for transcript) or a statement signed by counsel that there is either no verbatim record of the proceedings or the complete transcript has been lodged of record, shall accompany the notice of appeal, but the absence of or defect in the order for transcript shall not affect the validity of the appeal.
* * * * * (e) Content in criminal cases. When the Commonwealth takes an appeal pursuant to Rule 311(d), the notice of appeal shall include a certification by counsel that the order will terminate or substantially handicap the prosecution.
Official Note: [The former requirement that the appellant swear that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay has been omitted. The appeal to the Commonwealth Court was governed by former Commonwealth Court Rule 20A.]
The Offense Tracking Number (OTN) is required only in an appeal in a criminal proceeding. It enables the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts to collect and forward to the Pennsylvania State Police information pertaining to the disposition of all criminal cases as provided by the Criminal History Record Information Act, 18 Pa.C.S. § 9101 et seq.
[The form of the notice of appeal provided by subdivision (a) has been revised to include the required certification.]
The 1986 amendment requires that the notice of appeal include a statement that the order appealed from has been entered in the docket. The 1986 amendment deletes the requirement that the appellant certify that the order has been reduced to judgment. This omission does not eliminate the requirement of reducing an order to judgment before there is a final appealable order where required by applicable practice or case law.
An order for transcript is a request by the appellant of the court reporter to prepare a transcript of the verbatim record of the proceedings. It is not an order of the court, and no court order is required to obtain a transcript of the proceedings. See Pa.R.J.A. 5005.5 and the 1996 amendment to subdivision (a) of Rule 1911.
With respect to subdivision (e), in Commonwealth v. Dugger, 506 Pa. 537, 486 A.2d 382 (1985) the Supreme Court held that the Commonwealth's certification that an order will terminate or substantially handicap the prosecution is not subject to review as a prerequisite to the Superior Court's review of the merits of the appeal. Thus, the need for a detailed analysis of the effect of the order, formerly necessarily a part of the Commonwealth's appellate brief, was eliminated. See also Commonwealth v. Deans, 530 Pa. 514, 610 A.2d 32 (1992); Commonwealth v. Cohen, 529 Pa. 552, 605 A.2d 1212 (1992) (allowing appeals by the Commonwealth from adverse rulings on motions in limine). Accordingly, the 1996 amendment added subdivision (e) as a requirement when the Commonwealth takes an appeal pursuant to Rule 311(d).
Rule 906. Service of Notice of Appeal.
(a) ***
(1) All parties to the matter in the trial court, including parties previously dismissed pursuant to an interlocutory order.
(2) The judge of the court below, whether or not the reasons for the order appealed from already appear of record.
(3) The official court reporter of the trial court, whether or not an order for transcript accompanies the papers.
(4) The district court administrator or other person designated by the administrator pursuant to Rule [5000.5(a)(4)] 5000.5(a)(3) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration (requests and orders for transcripts).
(b) ***
Official Note: See Rule 908 (Parties on Appeal).
Rule 907. Docketing of Appeal.
(a) Docketing of appeal. Upon the receipt of the papers specified in Rule 905(b) (transmission to appellate court) the prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately enter the appeal upon the docket, note the appellate docket number upon the notice of appeal, and give written notice of the docket number assignment in person or by first class mail to the clerk of the lower court, to the appellant[,] and to the persons named in the proof of service accompanying the notice of appeal [and to the Administrative Office]. An appeal shall be docketed under the caption given to the matter in the lower court, with the appellant identified as such, but if such caption does not contain the name of the appellant, his name, identified as appellant, shall be added to the caption in the appellate court.
(b) Entry of appearance. Upon the docketing of the appeal the prothonotary of the appellate court shall note on the record as counsel for the appellant the name of [his] counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the notice of appeal, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The prothonotary of the appellate court shall upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed within 30 days after filing of the notice of appeal, strike off or correct the record of appearances. Thereafter [an entry of appearance may be withdrawn only by leave of the appellate court] a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
Official Note: The transmission of a photocopy of the notice of appeal, showing a stamped notation of filing and the appellate docket number assignment, without a letter of transmittal or other formalities, will constitute full compliance with the notice requirement of Subdivision (a) of this rule.
With regard to subdivision (b) and withdrawal of appearance without leave of the appellate court, counsel may nonetheless be subject to trial court supervision pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1504 (Appointment of Counsel; Forma Pauperis).
CHAPTER 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT
PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL Rule 1112. Appeals by Allowance.
* * * * * (b) Definition. Final Order. A final order of the Superior Court or Commonwealth Court is any order that concludes an appeal, including an order that remands an appeal, in whole or in part, unless the appellate court remands and retains jurisdiction.
[(b)] (c) ***
[(c)] (d) ***
[(d)] (e) ***
[(e)] (f) Entry of appearance.--Upon the filing of the petition for allowance of appeal the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court shall note on the record as counsel for the petitioner the name of his counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for allowance of appeal, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The Prothonotary shall upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed at any time within 30 days after filing of the petition, strike off or correct the record of appearance. Thereafter [an entry of appearance may be withdrawn only by leave of court] a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
* * * * * With regard to subdivision (f) and withdrawal of appearance without leave of the appellate court, counsel may nonetheless be subject to trial court supervision pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1504 (Appointment of Counsel; Forma Pauperis).
CHAPTER 13. INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS BY PERMISSION Rule 1311. Interlocutory Appeals by Permission.
* * * * * (b) Petition for permission to appeal. Permission to appeal from an interlocutory order containing the statement prescribed by 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) may be sought by filing a petition for permission to appeal with the prothonotary of the appellate court within 30 days after entry of such order in the lower court or other government unit with proof of service on all other parties to the matter in the lower court or other government unit and on the government unit or clerk of the lower court, who shall file the petition of record in such lower court. An application for an amendment of an interlocutory order to set forth expressly the statement specified in 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) shall be filed with the lower court or other government unit within 30 days after the entry of such interlocutory order and permission to appeal may be sought within 30 days after entry of the order as amended. [The trial court must act on the application within 30 days.] Unless the trial court or other governmental unit acts on the application within 30 days after it is filed, the trial court or other governmental unit shall no longer consider the application and it shall be deemed denied. If the petition for permission to appeal is transmitted to the prothonotary of the appellate court by means of first class mail, the petition shall be deemed received by the prothonotary for the purposes of Rule 121(a) (filing) on the date deposited in the United States mail, as shown on a U. S. Postal Service Form 3817 certificate of mailing. The certificate of mailing shall show the docket number of the matter in the lower court or other government unit and shall be either enclosed with the petition or separately mailed to the prothonotary. Upon actual receipt of the petition for permission to appeal the prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately stamp it with the date of actual receipt. That date, or the date of earlier deposit in the United States mail as prescribed in this subdivision, shall constitute the date when permission to appeal was sought, which date shall be shown on the docket. The prothonotary of the appellate court shall immediately note the appellate docket number assignment upon the petition for permission to appeal and give written notice of the docket number assignment in person or by first class mail to the government unit or clerk of the lower court, to the petitioner and to the other persons named in the proof of service accompanying the petition.
* * * * * (d) Entry of appearance. Upon the filing of the petition for permission to appeal the prothonotary of the appellate court shall note on the record as counsel for the petitioner the name of [his] counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for permission to appeal, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The prothonotary shall upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed at any time within 30 days after filing of the petition, strike off or correct the record of appearance. Thereafter [an entry of appearance may be withdrawn only by leave of court] a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
Official Note:
* * * * * The 1996 amendment provides for a deemed denial where the trial court or other governmental unit fails to act on the application within 30 days. Under such circumstances, a party may need to praecipe for entry of the deemed denial pursuant to Rule 301(d).
With regard to subdivision (d) and withdrawal of appearance without leave of the appellate court, counsel may nonetheless be subject to trial court supervision pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1504 (relating to Appointment of Counsel; Forma Pauperis).
CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL Rule 1501. Scope of Chapter.
* * * * * (c) Unsuspended statutory procedures. This chapter does not apply to any appeal pursuant to the following statutory provisions, which are not suspended by these rules:
(1) Section [135] 137 of Title 15 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (Court to pass upon rejection of documents by Department of State).
* * * * *
PETITION FOR REVIEW Rule 1513. Petition for Review.
* * * * * (d) Notice [of demand for evidentiary hearing] to plead.--If under the applicable law the questions raised by the petition for review may be determined in whole or in part upon the record made before the court, the petition shall contain or have endorsed upon it a notice to plead.
* * * * * Official Note:
* * * * * The 1996 amendment to subdivision (d) remedies what had been an inconsistency between the former heading and the text of the rule.
Rule 1514. Filing and Service of the Petition for Review.
* * * * * (d) Entry of appearance.--Upon the filing of the petition for review the prothonotary shall note on the record as counsel for the petitioner the name of [his] counsel, if any, set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for review, and, as counsel for other parties, counsel, if any, named in the proof of service. The prothonotary shall upon praecipe of any such counsel for other parties, filed within 30 days after filing of the petition, strike off or correct the record of appearances. Thereafter [an entry of appearance may be withdrawn only by leave of court] a counsel's appearance for a party may not be withdrawn without leave of court, unless another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
* * * * * Rule 1515. Answer to Petition.
Where under the applicable law the questions raised by the petition for review may be determined in whole or in part upon the record made before the court, and the right to an evidentiary hearing has been claimed by inclusion or endorsement of a notice to plead as prescribed by Rule 1513(d) [(notice of demand for evidentiary hearing)] (notice to plead), any adverse party may file an answer to the petition controverting any factual allegation of the petition.
* * * * * Rule 1532. Special and Summary Relief.
* * * * * (b) Summary relief.--At any time after the filing of a petition for review in an appellate or original matter the court may on application enter judgment if the right of the applicant thereto is clear. [A party against whom judgment is entered under this subdivision may apply to open or vacate the judgment within 30 days after entry, or within such lesser time as may be fixed by the court under Rule 105 (waiver and modification of rules) after reasonable notice to the parties.]
Official Note:
* * * * * The 1996 amendment to subdivision (b) is analogous to the 1996 amendment to Pa.R.C.P. 1098.
The deletion of the last sentence of Rule 1532(b) is intended to eliminate the requirement of filing a motion to open or vacate the order granting summary relief. Under prior practice, a party was required to file a motion to open or vacate the order granting summary relief before an appeal could be taken. To the extent that Zemprelli v. Scranton, 102 Pa. Commw. 637, 519 A.2d 518 (1986) suggest that an aggrieved party may appeal only from an order denying a motion to open or vacate an order granting summary relief, rather than the order granting summary relief, it is overruled. An order denying an application for summary relief is not appealable as of right.
REVIEW OF DETERMINATIONS OF THE BOARD OF FINANCE AND REVENUE Rule 1571. Determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue.
* * * * * (d) Service.--In the case of a petition for review by a taxpayer or similar party, a copy of the petition shall be served on the Board of Finance and Revenue and on the Attorney General by the petitioner in accordance with Rule 1514(c). All other parties before the Board shall be served as prescribed by Rule 121(b) (service of all papers required).
* * * * *
CHAPTER 17. EFFECTS AND APPEALS; SUPERSEDEAS AND STAYS
STAY OR INJUNCTION IN CIVIL MATTERS Rule 1734. Appropriate Security.
(a) General rule. For the purposes of this chapter any of the following, when deposited with the clerk, constitutes appropriate security, unless otherwise ordered pursuant to this chapter:
(1) Legal tender of the United States.
(2) Any of the following, if registered in the name of or to the order of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: (i) United States Treasury bills, (ii) certificates of deposit issued by a Federally-insured bank, bank and trust company, savings bank, savings association, banking association or savings and loan association having an office within this Commonwealth, (iii) irrevocable letters of credit issued by a Federally-insured bank, bank and trust company, savings bank, savings association, banking association or saving and loan association having an office within this Commonwealth. The clerk may transfer or negotiate such bills or certificates for the purposes of this chapter. [The clerk shall be entitled to receive commission or poundage with respect to such bills or certificates only when the deposit is made pursuant to Rule 1782 (security on review on tax matters).]
* * * * * Rule 1751. Form of Bond.
A bond under this chapter may be in substantially the following form:
(Caption) Appellant, having appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of ______ County (or ''of the ______ Judicial District''), entered in this matter on the __ day of ______ , 19 __ , and having procured the execution of this instrument for the purpose of complying with the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned surety acknowledges itself bound and indebted to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for the use of the persons or parties entitled thereto, in the sum of ______ dollars ($ ), to be paid as required by law.
[The condition of this obligation is that if the appellant shall satisfy the above-identified order, if it is affirmed or if for any reason the appeal is dismissed, or shall satisfy any modification of the order, and in either case shall pay all costs, interest and any damages for delay that may be awarded, this obligation shall be void; but otherwise it shall remain in force.]
Upon conclusion of this matter, if the appellant satisfies the above identified order or any court order modifying or affirming that order and pays all costs, interest and damages for delay that may be awarded, this obligation shall be void; otherwise, it shall remain in force.
Date ______
_________________
(Name of Surety)
By __________
(Name and Title of
Authorized signatory)* * * * *
STAY PENDING ACTION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW Rule 1782. Security on Review in Tax Matters.
* * * * * (b) Form of bond. A bond under this rule may be in substantially the following form:
(Caption) Petitioner, having sought review of an order of the Board of Finance and Revenue entered (or deemed entered) in this matter on the day of , 19 , and having procured the execution of this instrument for the purpose of complying with the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned surety acknowledges itself bound and indebted to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the [sum of 120% of] amount of $( ), which is 120% of the sum of $ (taxes found due) and $( ) (penalty found due), the amount of taxes and penalty found due by the Board and remaining unpaid in this matter, to be paid as required by law.
[The condition of this obligation is that if the Petitioner shall satisfy the above-identified order, if it is affirmed or if for any reason the matter is dismissed, or shall satisfy any modification of the order, and in either case shall pay all costs, interest and any damages for delay that may be awarded, this obligation shall be void; but otherwise it shall remain in force.]
Upon conclusion of this matter, if the petitioner satisfies the above identified order or any court order modifying or affirming that order and pays all costs, interest and any damages for delay that may be awarded, this obligation shall be void; otherwise it shall remain in full force.
Date ______
_________________
(Name of Surety)
By __________
(Name and Title of
Authorized signatory)* * * * *
CHAPTER 19. PREPARATION AND TRANSMISSION OF RECORD AND RELATED MATTERS
RECORD ON APPEAL FROM LOWER COURT Rule 1911. [Order] Request for Transcript.
* * * * * Official Note: [The order under this rule constitutes the ''formal request'' under] The 1996 amendment deletes the reference to order for transcript. See Pa.R.J.A. 5000.5 and 1996 amendment to Rule 904(c).
* * * * *
CHAPTER 21. BRIEFS AND REPRODUCED RECORD
CONTENT OF BRIEFS Rule 2132. References in Briefs to the Record.
(a) General rule. References in the briefs to parts of the record appearing in a reproduced record filed with the brief of the appellant (see Rule 2154(b) (large records)) shall be to the pages in the reproduced record where those parts appear, e.g.: ''(R. 26a).'' If the record is reproduced after the briefs are [filed] served in advance typewritten or page proof form (see Rule 2185(c) (definitive copies)), the brief may also contain references to the pages of the parts of the original record, e.g.: ''(Tr. 279--280; R. 26a--27a).''
* * * * * Rule 2136. Briefs in Cases Involving Cross Appeals.
If a cross appeal is filed, the plaintiff or moving party in the court or other government unit below shall be deemed the appellant for the purposes of this chapter and Chapter 23 (sessions and argument), unless the parties otherwise agree or the appellate court otherwise orders. Where the nature of the matter is such that the identity of the appellant for the purposes of this chapter and Chapter 23 is not readily apparent the prothonotary of the appellate court shall designate the appellant for the purposes of this chapter and Chapter 23 when giving notice under Rule 1934 (filing of the record). The brief of the appellee shall contain the issue and argument involved in [his] the cross appeal, as well as the answer to the brief of the appellant, and the appellant may file a brief in answer to the brief of the appellee on the cross appeal.
Official Note: Ordinarily there will be three briefs in a case involving a cross appeal: appellant's main brief, appellee's main brief, and appellant's reply brief directed to the issues on the cross appeal. However, [if the case is submitted without oral argument,] Rule 2113 permits a fourth brief: appellee's reply to appellant's answer on the cross appeal.
Rule 2140. Brief on Remand or Following Grant of Reargument or Reconsideration.
* * * * * (b) [Caption] Cover on brief. The brief (whether new or refiled) shall be appropriately [captioned] titled to reflect the current status of the case (e.g., brief on remand, supplemental brief on remand, brief on reargument, supplemental brief on reargument).
* * * * *
CONTENT OF REPRODUCED RECORD Rule 2153. Docket Entries and Related Matter.
* * * * * [Official Note: Based on former Supreme Court Rules 42 and 43; former Superior Court Rules 34 and 35, and (in the case of Subdivision (a)) former Commonwealth Court Rule 87, without change in substance. As to the type of matters contemplated by Subdivision (b) see Steel v. Levy, 282 Pa. 338, 343, 127 A. 766, 768 (1925).]
Rule 2154. Designation of Contents of Reproduced Record.
* * * * *
Explanatory Note--1979 The principal criticism of the new Appellate Rules has been the provisions for deferred preparation of the reproduced record, and the resulting procedure for the filing of advance copies of briefs (since the page citations to the reproduced record pages are not then available) followed by the later preparation and filing of definitive briefs with citations to the reproduced record pages. It has been argued that in the typical state court appeal the record is quite small, with the result that the pre-1976 practice of reproducing the record in conjunction with the preparation of appellant's definitive brief is entirely appropriate and would ordinarily be followed if the rules did not imply a preference for the deferred method. The Committee has been persuaded by these comments, and the rules have been redrafted to imply that the deferred method is a secondary method particularly appropriate for longer records.
[Also, the number of briefs to be filed under the in forma pauperis procedure has been increased from ten to 15 in the Commonwealth and Superior Courts.]
FILING AND SERVICE Rule 2185. Time for Serving and Filing Briefs.
(a) General rule. The appellant shall serve [his] appellant's brief not later than the date fixed pursuant to Subdivision (b) of this rule, or within 40 days after the date on which the record is filed, if no other date is so fixed. The appellee shall serve [his] the appellee's brief within 30 days after service of the appellant's brief [of the appellant] and reproduced record if proceeding under Rule 2154(a). A party may serve a reply brief permitted by these rules within 14 days after service of the preceding brief but, except for good cause shown, a reply brief must be served and filed so as to be received at least three days before argument. Except as prescribed by Rule 2187(b) (advance text of briefs), each brief shall be filed not later than the last day fixed by or pursuant to this rule for its service.
* * * * * Official Note: Former Supreme Court Rule 57 and former Superior Court Rule 47 provided that the brief of the appellant was to be filed within 60 days after the issuance of the writ of certiorari. Former Commonwealth Court Rule 32A provided that the brief of the appellant was to be filed within 30 days of mailing of notice of the filing of the record. To avoid paperwork relating to continuances because the record is not ready, the time under these rules commences to run from the filing of the record. The time for filing the brief of the appellee is the same as under the prior practice, except that formerly only 25 days was allowed in the Commonwealth Court.
Subdivision (b) is necessary because approximately one year can elapse under existing practices before an appellate court hears a case filed in the Middle or Harrisburg districts, and briefing the case far in advance permits intervening decisions and legislation to render the briefs stale.]
Unlike the provision for filing other papers, Rule 121(a) provides ''paperbooks shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if first class mail is utilized.'' ''Paperbooks'' are defined in Rule 102 as briefs and reproduced records, but ''the term does not include applications for reconsideration of denial of allowance of appeal under Rule 1123(b) (reconsideration) or applications for reargument under Chapter 25 (post-submission proceedings).''
Rule 2186. Time for Serving and Filing Reproduced Record.
(a) General rule. The reproduced record shall be served and filed not later than:
(1) the date of service of the appellant's brief [of the appellant]; or
(2) [51 days after the date of service of the brief of appellant in advance form] 21 days from the date of service of the appellee's brief in advance form, if the record is being reproduced pursuant to Rule 2154(b) (large records).
* * * * * Official Note: Former Supreme Court Rule 57, former Superior Court Rule 47 and former Commonwealth Court Rule 32A provided that the appellant was to serve and file the reproduced record with his brief, which continues to be the rule under Paragraph [(a)(2)] (a)(1) of this rule. The delayed filing of the reproduced record results in the designation and reproduction of the minimum amount of the original record since the parties will then know exactly the portions of the original record mentioned in their briefs and may accordingly limit the amount of record reproduced.
Rule 2187. Number of Copies to be Served and Filed.
(a) General rule. [Twenty-five copies of each definitive brief and of each reproduced record shall be filed with the Prothonotary of the Supreme Court, and fifteen copies of each definitive brief and of each reproduced record shall be filed with the Prothonotary of the Commonwealth Court and ten copies shall be filed with the Superior Court, unless the appellate court by order in a particular case shall direct a lesser number, and two copies of each definitive brief and of each reproduced record shall be served on each party separately represented.] Unless the appellate court directs otherwise, each party shall file:
(i) twenty-five (25) copies of each definitive brief and reproduced record in the Supreme Court;
(ii) fifteen (15) copies of each definitive brief and eight (8) copies of each reproduced record in the Commonwealth Court;
(iii) seven (7) copies of each definitive brief and reproduced record in the Superior Court.
Each party shall serve two (2) copies of its definitive brief and reproduced record on every other party separately represented.
* * * * * (c) In forma pauperis. [A party who has been permitted to proceed in forma pauperis shall file fifteen copies of his brief with the prothonotary of the appellate court and shall serve one copy on each party separately represented.] Unless the appellate court directs otherwise, a party who has been permitted to proceed in forma pauperis shall file:
(i) fifteen (15) copies of each definitive brief with the Supreme Court;
(ii) fifteen (15) copies of each definitive brief with the Commonwealth Court;
(iii) seven (7) copies of each definitive brief with the Superior Court.
Each party who has been permitted to proceed in form pauperis shall serve one copy of each definitive brief on every other party separately represented.
* * * * *
CHAPTER 23. SESSIONS AND ARGUMENT
SCHEDULING OF ARGUMENT Rule 2311. Submission on Briefs.
* * * * * (b) Post conviction [hearing] relief cases. All parties shall submit post conviction [hearing] relief cases on the briefs unless otherwise directed by the court on its own motion or upon application.
* * * * * Rule 2313. Advancement or Continuance.
* * * * * Official Note: [Based on former Supreme Court Rules 27 and 72, former Superior Court Rules 16 and 17, and former Commonwealth Court Rule 71. The omitted procedural provisions are covered by Rule 123 (applications for relief). Obviously, when all parties join in an application, the court may act upon it without waiting the seven-day period for answer. The Supreme Court formerly permitted two automatic extensions of time for filing briefs (usually resulting in corresponding continuance to a later argument list) by consent of the parties; the Superior Court formerly permitted one such automatic extension. Generally the only justifiable basis for such automatic extensions was the difficulty in securing the preparation and transmission of the original record. Since under Rule 2185 (time for serving and filing briefs) the usual briefing schedule commences no earlier than the filing of the record in the appellate court, there is no longer any need for the automatic extension machinery.
The rule does not, as did former Supreme Court Rule 72 and former Superior Court Rule 17, contain any specific deadline for the filing of an application for continuance. Obviously, the later the party files such an application the greater the risk (1) that the court will not be able to act upon it in time, or (2) if it is denied, that the unsuccessful applicant will find it difficult or impossible to comply with these rules, with the adverse consequences which flow therefrom.
In the Supreme Court, continuances are handled by the Chief Justice.] Rule 3305 provides that in the Supreme Court, the prothonotary may dispose of motions generally relating to calendar control. In the Superior Court, continuances are handled by the presiding judge of the panel. In the Commonwealth Court, continuances are handled by the president judge or the duty judge. In each [Appellate Court] appellate court, the application is to be submitted to the prothonotary and not to an individual judge of the appellate court.
CHAPTER 25. POST-SUBMISSION PROCEEDINGS
APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT Rule 2543. Considerations Governing Allowance of Reargument.
Reargument before an appellate court is not a matter of right, but of sound judicial discretion, and reargument will be allowed only when there are compelling reasons therefor. An application for reargument is not permitted from a final order of an intermediate appellate court under (1) the Pennsylvania Election Code; or (2) the Local Government Unit Debt Act or any similar statute relating to the authorization of public debt.
Official Note: The following, while neither controlling nor fully measuring the discretion of the court, indicate the character of the reasons which will be considered:
* * * * * The 1996 amendment eliminates the prior practice of permitting application for reargument in matters arising under the Pennsylvania Election Code, the act of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, 25 P. S. §§ 2600--3591, [et seq.,] or the Local Government Unit Debt Act, the act of July 12, 1972, P. L. 781, 53 P. S. §§ 6780-1--6780-609. [et seq.] Matters involving elections and authorization of public debt require expeditious treatment. See, e.g., Rule 1113(c).
Rule 2546. Transmission of Papers to and Action by the Court.
* * * * * Official Note: See Rule 2140 regarding the filing and content of briefs following the grant of reargument or reconsideration.
Where there is a deemed denial of an application for reargument, a party seeking a further appeal must follow subdivision (d) of Rule 301 and praecipe for entry of the deemed denial on the docket, if the prothonotary has failed to do so.
ARTICLE III. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT
REVIEW OF SPECIAL PERSECUTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS Rule 3331. Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations.
(a) General rule. Any of the following orders shall be subject to review pursuant to Chapter 15 (judicial review of governmental determinations):
* * * * * [(5) An order enforcing or refusing to enforce a subpoena issued by or otherwise affecting the existence or operation of the Pennsylvania Crime Commission existing under the Pennsylvania Crime Commission Act (71 P. S. § 1199.1 et seq.)]
[(6)] (5) ***
Official Note: This rule is intended to provide a simple and expeditious method for Supreme Court supervision of special prosecutions and investigations, e.g. orders of the supervising judge of an investigating grand jury, findings of contempt (whether civil or criminal) by witnesses called before such a grand jury, etc. Rule 702([b]c) (supervision of special prosecutions or investigations) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(5) (direct appeals from courts of common pleas) vest jurisdiction over such matters in the Supreme Court. However, this rule is not applicable to review of investigating grand jury issues which collaterally arise in plenary criminal prosecution initiated by complaint, information or indictment. Rule 1512(b)(3) (special provisions) requires that review be sought within ten days. Essentially the procedure is analogous to the review of a bail order under Rule 1762 (release in criminal matters). The last brief is due not later than 21 days after the entry of the order sought to be reviewed. There is no delay for certification of the record, oral argument is ordinarily not available, and the matter is ready for final disposition by the Supreme Court immediately upon completion of the briefing schedule. The term ''investigating grand jury'' in Subdivision (a) includes a ''multicounty investigating grand jury'' convened under 42 Pa.C.S. § 4544 (convening multicounty investigating grand jury).
The ''independent grounds'' referred to in Subdivision (d) include grounds for relief in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, etc. and cases where the order is reviewable under the standards of 42 Pa.C.S. § 702(b) (interlocutory appeals by permission). Failure to petition for review under this rule from an interlocutory order will ordinarily not constitute a waiver of objections to the order since, except as prescribed by Rule 311 ([d]g)(1)(ii) (waiver of objections), there is no requirement under these rules that a party seek available interlocutory relief.
Under Rule 1702(a) (stay ancillary to appeal) the Supreme Court or a justice thereof will not entertain an application for relief under Rule 1781 (stay pending action on petition for review) in connection with a special prosecution or investigation order until a petition for review has been filed under this rule.
CHAPTER 51. PROVISIONS OF LAW SAVED AND ABROGATED Rule 5101 is rescinded and replaced with the following:
Rule 5101. Statutes and Other Authorities Suspended or Abrogated.
(a) The Statute of 13 Edw. 1, c. 31 (3 Binney 606) (1 Ruffhead 99) is hereby suspended absolutely insofar as it is in force in this Commonwealth as supplied by Rule 1923 of these rules.
(b)
(1) The practice and procedure provided in all former statutes governing appellate procedure within the scope of these rules, which have been repealed effective June 27, 1978 or June 27, 1979 by the Judiciary Act Repealer Act (JARA), act of April 28, 1978 (P. L. 202, No. 53), and which are now part of the common law of this Commonwealth by virtue of Section 3(b) of JARA (42 P. S. § 20003(b)) are hereby abolished and shall not continue as part of the common law of this Commonwealth.
(2) With respect to all statutes relating to practice and procedure, repeal of which will become effective June 27, 1980 as provided by Section 4(b) of JARA (42 P. S. § 20004(b)), these rules are a general rule within the meaning of Section 3(b) of JARA and the practice and procedure provided in those statutes, so far as relates to appellate procedure within the scope of these rules, shall not continue as part of the common law of this Commonwealth.
(c) These rules are intended to provide a complete and exclusive procedure relating to appellate practice and procedure and:
(1) Except as provided in Rule 5102 (statutes saved from suspension), all statutes relating to practice and procedure finally enacted prior to January 1, 1981 are hereby suspended to the extent inconsistent with these rules.
(2) All local rules of court relating to appellate practice and procedure are hereby abrogated, except where these rules expressly authorize the adoption of a local rule of court supplementary to a provision of these rules applicable to appeals generally.
Rule 5102. Statutes Saved from Suspension.
* * * * * (b) Other statutes.--These rules shall not be deemed to suspend or affect:
(1) ***
(2) ***
(3) ***
(4) ***
[(5) Last sentence of section 423 of the act of June 13, 1967 (P. L. 31, No. 21), known as the Public Welfare Code (62 P. S. § 423).]
Official Note: Relates to automatic supersedeas of orders in public assistance matters.
(6) 15 Pa.C.S. § [135] 137 (Commonwealth Court to pass upon rejection of documents by Department of State).
(7) Rescinded. 20 Pa.C.S. § 746 (money paid into court), repealed by the Judiciary Act Repealer Act effective June 27, 1980.
Official Note: Rule 5102(b)(7) is rescinded as obsolete effective June 27, 1980.
Explanatory Comment Introduction: The Appellate Court Rules Committee originally published Recommendation 28 at 24 Pa.B. 2289--2296 (April 30, 1994) following comments the Committee withdrew proposed amendments to Rules 2113, 2315 and 2542. In addition, the Committee has added proposed amendments to Rules 313, 341, 343, 752, 1514, 1911, 2153 and 2154, 2313, 2543, 2546 and 3331. Because of the extensive revisions to Recommendation 28 the Committee has republished it for comment.
Rule 121 (Filing and Service)
The proposed amendment substitutes gender neutral language.
Rule 123 (Application for Relief)
The proposed amendment to Rule 123 specifies that actions of a single judge acting as a quorum of the Commonwealth Court in an election matter, see Pa.R.A.P. 3102(c)(2), are not subject to review by that court. The proposed amendment to Rule 2543 is to specify that no application for reargument will be entertained in cases under either the Pennsylvania Election Code or the Local Government Debt Act. The proposed amendments to Rules 123 and 2543 will expedite final determination of Election Code matters and matters under the Local Government Unit Debt Act. It is inconsistent to permit reargument or reconsideration in such cases while maintaining a ten day time limit for a petition for allowance of appeal. See Rule 1113(c). See also Rule 903(c)(2) and (3) (ten day appeal period for matters arising under Election Code and Local Government Unit Debt Act) and Rule 1512(b)(1) (15 day petition for review period from determination of the Department of Community Affairs in any matter arising under the Local Government Unit Debt Act).
Rule 313 (Collateral Orders)
The Official Note to Rule 313 is amended to correct typographical errors and to update citations.
Rule 341 (Final Orders; Generally)
The 1996 amendments to subdivisions (a) and (c) of Rule 341 substitute the conjunction ''and'' for ''or''. These amendments are not substantive; they merely clarify that by definition any order which disposes of all claims will dispose of all parties and any order that disposes of all parties will dispose of all claims. Use of the conjunction ''or'' mistakenly implies that it is possible to dispose of all claims, but not all parties, or all parties, but not all claims. Also, the Official Note to Rule 341 is amended to correct a typographical error in a citation.
The proposed 1996 amendment to subdivision (c)(2) provides for a deemed denial where the trial court or other governmental unit fails to act on the application within 30 days. Under such circumstances, a party may need to praecipe for entry of the deemed denial pursuant to Rule 301(d) to perfect an appeal.
Rule 343 (Order Determining Challenge to a Plea of Guilty)
Rule 343 is rescinded as obsolete in view of prior rescission of Pa.R.Crim.P. 321 and adoption of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1410 (Post-Sentence Procedures; Appeal).
Rule 752 (Transfers Between Superior and Commonwealth Courts)
Rule 752 is amended to require a party filing an answer opposing an application for transfer to proceed in accordance with Rule 123(b).
Rule 904 (Content of the Notice of Appeal)
The proposed amendment to subdivision (c) provides for a statement signed by counsel that there is either no verbatim record of the proceedings or that the complete transcript has been lodged of record. The proposed amendment to subdivision (c) also explains that the order of transcript is, in fact, a request by appellant and not an order of court. The proposed note cross-references Rule 1911(a) (Order for Transcript; General Rule), which explains that the transcript is ''ordered'' by appellant. The proposed amendment to the note remedies a problem where some common pleas court judges have required that an order for transcript be entered by the Court.
The proposed amendment to subdivision (e) requires certification in the notice of appeal when the Commonwealth takes an appeal pursuant to Rule 311(d).
The proposed amendment adding subdivision (e) provides that when the Commonwealth takes an appeal pursuant to Rule 311(d), the notice of appeal shall include a certification by counsel that the order will terminate or substantially handicap the prosecution.
The proposed amendment to the Official Note to Rule 904 deletes the penultimate sentence of the last paragraph which is not useful.
The proposed amendment to the Note to Rule 904 adds an explanation of Commonwealth v. Dugger, 506 Pa. 537, 486 A.2d 382 (1985) and its progeny.
Rule 906 (Service of Notice of Appeal)
The proposed amendment to Rule 906 provides for service of a notice of appeal to parties previously dismissed from an action where the dismissal was nonappealable or where an interlocutory appeal as of right is optional and an immediate appeal was not taken. The interests of such dismissed parties may be directly affected by such appeals and they should receive notices of appeal. Because an order dismissing one party in a multiparty case is no longer appealable immediately as of right, a defendant dismissed by an interlocutory order from a case prior to entry of a final order dismissing all claims and all parties may be brought back into the case by a plaintiff/appellant appealing the earlier order of dismissal.
Rule 907 (Docketing of Appeal)
The proposed amendment to subdivision (a) deletes the requirement of docket number assignment notice to the Administrative Office.
The proposed amendment to subdivision (b) deletes the requirement that substitution of counsel not delay proceedings. The Official Note is to be amended to cross-reference Pa.R.Crim.P. 1504.
Subsection (b) is amended to prohibit withdrawal of appearance without leave of court unless another attorney has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance.
Rule 1112 (Appeals by Allowance)
The proposed amendment adds a new subdivision (b) is added defining a final order for purposes of appeals by allowance as ''any order that concludes an appeal including an order that remands an appeal, in whole or in part, unless the appellate court remands and retains jurisdiction.'' The proposed new subdivision (b) also clarifies that where an intermediate appellate court remands a matter, but retains jurisdiction, there is no final order from which to petition for allowance of appeal. The proposed amendment is needed because of some confusion in the bar that order of an intermediate appellate court such as a remand for trial is interlocutory. In fact, such an order of an intermediate appellate court is final for purposes of an appeal or petition for allowance of appeal to the Supreme Court.
The proposed amendment to subdivision (f) provides that a counsel's appearance can be withdrawn without leave of court where another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
The proposed amendment to the Official Note cross-references Pa.R.Crim.P. 1504.
Rule 1311 (Interlocutory Appeals by Permission)
Subdivision (b) is amended as follows: ''The trial court or other government unit must act on the application within 30 days.''
Subdivision (d) is amended to prohibit withdrawal of appearance without leave of court unless another attorney has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance.
The proposed 1996 amendment provides for a deemed denial where the trial court or other governmental unit fails to act on the application within 30 days. Under such circumstances, a party may need to praecipe for entry of the deemed denial pursuant to Rule 301(d).
Rule 1501 (Scope of Chapter)
This is a technical amendment to paragraph (c)(1) to correct a code citation as follows: ''Section [135] 137 of Title 15 . . . '' This is to conform to legislative renumbering of Title 15 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes.
Rule 1513 (Petition for Review)
The proposed amendment redesignates subdivision (d) as ''Notice to Plead'' instead of ''Notice of Demand for Evidentiary Hearing,'' when a matter is within the original jurisdiction of Commonwealth Court. This remedies an inconsistency between the heading and the text of rule.
Rule 1514 (Filing and Service of the Petition for Review)
The proposed amendment clarifies that a counsel's appearance can be withdrawn without leave of court where another lawyer has entered or simultaneously enters an appearance for the party.
Rule 1515 (Answer to Petition)
The proposed amendment conforms the reference to ''Notice To Plead.'' See proposed amendment to Rule 1513(d).
Rule 1532 (Special and Summary Relief)
The proposed amendment deletes the last sentence of subdivision (b) to eliminate the requirement of filing a motion to open or vacate an order granting summary relief. The proposed amendment overrules Zemprelli v. Scranton, 102 Pa. Cmwlth. Ct. 637, 519 A.2d 518 (1986). The proposed amendment to subdivision (b) is explained in the proposed amendment to the Official Note. This change is similar to amendment to Pa.R.C.P. 1098 effective January 1, 1996. See also proposed amendment to Rule 311(a)(5) in Recommendation 28-A.
Rule 1571 (Determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue)
The proposed amendment requires that service of a petition for review from a Board of Finance and Review determination must be served on the Attorney General in accordance with Rule 1514(c), i.e., service in person or by certified mail.
Rule 1734 (Appropriate Security)
The proposed amendment to Pa.R.A.P. 1734 adds as appropriate security irrevocable letters of credit and uses language comparable to that applicable to certificates of deposit.
Rule 1751 (Form of Bond)
The proposed amendment to Pa.R.A.P. 1751 substitutes plain English for the legalese in the second paragraph of the bond form.
Rule 1782 (Security on Review in Tax Matters)
The proposed amendment simplifies the second paragraph of subdivision (b) which sets forth the form of bond on a petition for review in tax matters.
Rule 1911 ([Order] Request for Transcript)
The Proposed amendment deletes the reference to an order for transcript. Since the order for transcript is, in fact, a request by a party and not an order of court, the use of the term order is misleading. See proposed amendment to Rule 904.
Rule 2132 (References in Briefs to the Record)
The proposed amendment corrects a reference to advance forms of brief. Advance briefs are to be served, but not filed.
Rule 2136 (Briefs in Cases Involving Cross Appeals)
The proposed amendment to the rule substitutes gender neutral language. The proposed amendment to the note is necessary because based on the 1987 amendments waiver of oral argument is no longer a prerequisite before an appellee may file a reply to appellant's answer on a cross-appeal.
Rule 2140 (Brief on Remand or Following Grant of Reargument or Reconsideration)
The proposed amendment reflects that the title on the cover of the brief (not the caption) should reflect the current status of the case.
Rule 2153 (Docket Entries and Related Matter)
The proposed amendment deletes the Official Note. The Official Note is a historical reference that does not assist in application of the rule.
Rule 2154 (Designation of Contents of Reproduced Record)
The proposed amendment deletes an inaccurate reference in the note of the number of briefs to be filed under the in forma pauperis procedure.
Rule 2185 (Time for Serving and Filing Briefs)
The proposed amendment requires that reproduced record be filed before the appellee's brief is due.
Rule 2186 (Time for Serving and Filing Reproduced Record)
The proposed amendment sets the time for service of the reproduced record as 21 days after service of appellee's brief rather than 51 days after service of appellant's advance brief. The proposed amendment to the official note corrects an erroneous reference to paragraph (a)(2). The proper reference is to paragraph (a)(1).
Rule 2187 (Number of Copies to be Served and Filed)
The proposed amendment conforms the number of briefs required by Commonwealth Court and Superior Court to actual practice.
Rule 2311 (Submission on Briefs)
The proposed amendment changes ''PCHA'' to ''PCRA''.
Rule 2313 (Advancement or Continuance)
The proposed amendment deletes historical references in the Official Note which do not assist in application of the rule. The Official Note is further amended to cross-reference Rule 3305 and explain that ''in the Supreme Court the prothonotary may dispose of motions generally relating to calendar control.''
Rule 2543 (Considerations Governing Allowance of Reargument)
Rule 2543 is amended to provide that: ''An application for reargument is not permitted from a final order of an appellate court under (1) the Pennsylvania Election Code; or (2) the Local Government Unit Debt Act or any similar statute relating to the authorization of public debt.'' See summary to Rule 123 (explaining why reargument is anomalous to the expedited appeal period for such cases).
Rule 3331 (Review of Special Prosecutions or Investigations)
Paragraph (a)(5) (''An order enforcing or refusing to enforce a subpoena issued by or otherwise affecting the existence or operation of the Pennsylvania Crime Commission existing under the Pennsylvania Crime Commission Act (71 P. S. § 1190.1 et seq.'') is deleted.
Rule 5101 (Statutes and Other Authorities Suspended or Abrogated)
The proposed amendment to Rule 5101 deletes subdivisions (a) and (c) because the legislature has repealed the statutory provisions which previously had been suspended by this Rule. The proposed amendment also deletes subdivision (d) which is obsolete.
Rule 5102 (Statutes Saved from Suspension)
The proposed amendment corrects the Rule to conform legislative renumbering of Title 15 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 96-667. Filed for public inspection April 26, 1996, 9:00 a.m.]
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
