Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Bulletin website includes the following: Rulemakings by State agencies; Proposed Rulemakings by State agencies; State agency notices; the Governor’s Proclamations and Executive Orders; Actions by the General Assembly; and Statewide and local court rules.

PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 08-1837

THE COURTS

Title 237--JUVENILE RULES

PART I.  RULES

[ 237 PA. CODE CH. 16 ]

Proposed Modifications to Rule 1613

[38 Pa.B. 5592]
[Saturday, October 11, 2008]

   The Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee is planning to recommend to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that the modification of Rule 1613 be adopted and prescribed. The proposed modified Rule 1613 provides each method for terminating court supervision in dependency cases. This proposal has not been submitted for review by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

   The following explanatory Report highlights the intent of the rule. Please note that the Committee's Reports should not be confused with the official Committee Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the Committee's Comments or the contents of the explanatory Reports.

   We request that interested persons submit suggestions, comments or objections concerning this proposal to the Committee through counsel,

   A. Christine Riscili, Esq.
   Staff Counsel
   Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
   Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee
   5035 Ritter Road, Suite 700
   Mechanicsburg, PA 17055

no later than Thursday, November 6, 2008.

By the Juvenile Court
Procedural Rules Committee
:

FRANCIS BARRY MCCARTHY,   
Chair

Annex A

TITLE 237.  JUVENILE RULES

PART I.  RULES

Subpart B.  DEPENDENCY MATTERS

CHAPTER 16.  POST-DISPOSITIONAL PROCEDURES

PART B.  PERMANENCY HEARING

Rule 1613.  Termination of Court Supervision.

   A.  Concluding Supervision. Any party, or the court on its own motion, may move for the termination of supervision when court-ordered services from the county agency are no longer needed and:

   1)  the child has remained with the guardian and the circumstances which necessitated the dependency adjudication have been alleviated;

   2)  the child has been reunified with the guardian and the circumstances which necessitated the dependency adjudication and placement have been alleviated;

   3)  the child has been placed with a ready, willing, and able parent [has come forward] who was not previously identified by the county agency;

   [2)] 4)  the child has been adopted and services from the county agency are no longer needed;

   [3)  the court has transferred jurisdiction to another court;]

   5)  the child has been placed in the custody of a permanent legal custodian and services from the county agency are no longer needed;

   6)  the child has been placed in the custody of a fit and willing relative and services from the county agency are no longer needed;

   7)  the child has been placed in another living arrangement intended to be permanent and services from the county agency are no longer needed;

   8)  the child has been adjudicated delinquent and services from the county agency are no longer needed;

   9)  the child has been emancipated by the court;

   [4)] 10)  the child is eighteen years old and [no longer wants service] refusing further services from the county agency;

   11)  the child has died;

   12)  a court in another county of this Commonwealth has accepted jurisdiction; or

   13)  a court in another state has accepted jurisdiction.

   [5)  the court has found other reasons for termination of court supervision; or

   6)a)  the family has completed the terms of the family service plan or permanency plan; and

   b)  the child is returned to the guardian.]

   B.  Ready, willing, and able parent. When services from the county agency are no longer necessary because the court has determined that the child is not dependent pursuant to paragraph (A)([2]3) because a non-custodial parent has been found by the court to be able and available, the court shall enter an order awarding custody to that parent and the court order shall have the effect and be docketed as a decision entered pursuant to Pa.R.C.P.

*      *      *      *      *

Comment

   For procedures on motions, see Rule 1344. For procedures on the dispositional order, see Rule 1515.

   [See also,] For guidelines under paragraph (A), see 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301(b) & 6351(f.1).

   Pursuant to paragraph (A)(8), if a child has been adjudicated delinquent, the court may terminate court supervision unless dependency is necessary for placement. In re Deanna S., 422 Pa.  Super. 439, 619 A.2d 758 (1993). The court may also decide to retain dependency jurisdiction regardless of the delinquency adjudication because the child still needs dependency services.

   For procedures on emancipation pursuant to paragraph (A)(9), see Berks County Children and Youth Services v. Rowan, 428 Pa. Super. 448, 631 A.2d 615 (1993). See also, 22 Pa. Code § 11.11, 55 Pa. Code § 145.62.

   Pursuant to paragraph (A)(10), a child who was adjudicated dependent prior to reaching the age of eighteen and who, while engaged in a course of instruction or treatment, requests the court to retain jurisdiction until the course has been completed, may remain in the course of instruction or treatment until the age of twenty-one. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6302. See also, 55 Pa. Code §§ 3130.5 & 3130.87; In re S.J., 906 A.2d 547 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).

   The court may not terminate jurisdiction solely because the dependent child is a runaway. In re Deanna S., 422 Pa. Super. 439, 619 A.2d 758 (1993).

   A child whose non-custodial parent is ready, willing, and able to provide adequate care for the child may not be found dependent. In re M.L., 562 Pa. 646, 757 A.2d 849 (2000). See paragraph (B).

   Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(a)(2.1), a court may transfer permanent legal custody to a person found by the court to be qualified to receive and care for the child. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(a)(2.1). See also Justin S., 375 Pa. Super. 88, 543 A.2d 1192 (1988).

*      *      *      *      *

EXPLANATORY REPORT

Rule 1613--Termination of Court Supervision.

   The proposed modified Rule 1613 provides each method for terminating a case. This change will eliminate any confusion as to how a dependency case can be terminated. This will also enable a more efficient tracking of the dependency cases and the reasons for their termination.

   Paragraphs (A)(1) and (2) are preferred permanency choices under the Juvenile Act. 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6301(b) and 6351(f.1)(1).

   Paragraph (A)(3) is addressed by In re M.L., 562 Pa.646, 757 A.2d 849 (2000). A child whose non-custodial parent is ready, willing, and able to provide adequate care for the child may not be found dependent. If this parent comes forward after the commencement of dependency proceedings, the court may terminate the dependency supervision and enter an order awarding custody to the parent. See paragraph (B).

   Paragraphs (A)(4)--(7) are other permanency options provided for in the Juvenile Act. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(F.1)(2)--(5).

   Pursuant to paragraph (A)(8), if a child has been adjudicated delinquent, the court may terminate court supervision unless dependency is necessary for placement. In re Deanna S., 422 Pa. Super. 439, 619 A.2d 758 (1993). The court may also decide to retain dependency jurisdiction regardless of the delinquency adjudication so the child can obtain dependency services from the county agency.

   The court may also decide to emancipate the child under paragraph (A)(9). See Berks County Children and Youth Services v. Rowan, 428 Pa.Super. 448, 631 A.2d 615 (1993). See also, 22 Pa. Code § 11.11, 55 Pa. Code § 145.62.

   Pursuant to paragraph (A)(10), a child who was adjudicated dependent prior to reaching the age of eighteen and who, while engaged in a course of instruction or treatment, requests the court to retain jurisdiction until the course has been completed, may remain in the course of instruction or treatment until the age of twenty-one. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6302. See also, 55 Pa. Code §§ 3130.5 and 3130.87; In re S.J., 906 A.2d 547 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006).

   The court may also transfer the case to another court. See paragraphs (A)(12) and (13).

   The court may not terminate jurisdiction solely because the dependent child is a runaway. In re Deanna S., 422 Pa. Super. 439, 619 A.2d 758 (1993).

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 08-1837. Filed for public inspection October 10, 2008, 9:00 a.m.]



No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.