THE COURTS
Title 231—RULES
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
In Re: Adoption of Rule 233.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; No. 522; Civil Procedural Rules
[40 Pa.B. 1490]
[Saturday, March 20, 2010]
Order Per Curiam:
And Now, this 8th day of March, 2010, upon the recommendation of the Civil Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment at 38 Pa.B. 5590 (October 11, 2008), and in the Atlantic Reporter (Second Series Advance Sheets, Vol. 955 No. 1):
It Is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 233.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure is adopted as follows.
This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective April 8, 2010.
PATRICIA NICOLA,
Chief Clerk
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Annex A
TITLE 231. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
PART I. GENERAL
CHAPTER 200. BUSINESS OF COURTS Rule 233.1. Frivolous Litigation. Pro Se Plaintiff. Motion to Dismiss.
(a) Upon the commencement of any action filed by a pro se plaintiff in the court of common pleas, a defendant may file a motion to dismiss the action on the basis that:
(1) the pro se plaintiff is alleging the same or related claims which the pro se plaintiff raised in a prior action against the same or related defendants; and
(2) these claims have already been resolved pursuant to a written settlement agreement or a court proceeding.
(b) The court may stay the action while the motion is pending.
(c) Upon granting the motion and dismissing the action, the court may bar the pro se plaintiff from pursuing additional pro se litigation against the same or related defendants raising the same or related claims without leave of court.
(d) The court may sua sponte dismiss an action that is filed in violation of a court order entered under subdivision (c).
Official Note: A pro se party is not barred from raising counterclaims or claims against other parties in litigation that the pro se plaintiff did not institute.
(e) The provisions of this rule do not apply to actions under the rules of civil procedure governing family law actions.
Explanatory Comment It has come to the attention of the Supreme Court that certain litigants are abusing the legal system by repeatedly filing new litigation raising the same claims against the same defendant even though the claims have been previously adjudicated either through settlement or through court proceedings. New Rule 233.1 provides relief to a defendant who has been subjected to this type of repetitive litigation. While attorneys are subject to the rules of disciplinary procedure, no analogous rule exists to curb this type of abuse when done by a pro se party.
Upon the filing of an action by a pro se plaintiff, a defendant may file a motion to dismiss a pending action provided that (1) the pro se plaintiff is alleging the same or related claims against the same or related defendants, and (2) the claims have already been resolved pursuant to a settlement agreement or a court proceeding. The new rule also gives the trial court discretion to bar the pro se litigant from filing further litigation against the same or related defendants raising the same or related claims without leave of court.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 10-493. Filed for public inspection March 19, 2010, 9:00 a.m.]
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.