THE COURTS
PART I. RULES
[ 237 PA. CODE CHS. 11—16 ]
Order Amending Rules 1120, 1210, 1240, 1242, 1330, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611 and 1635 and Adopting New Rule 1149 of the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure; No. 669 Supreme Court Rules Doc.
[45 Pa.B. 3987]
[Saturday, July 25, 2015]
Order Per Curiam
And Now, this 13th day of July, 2015, upon the recommendation of the Juvenile Court Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment before adoption at 43 Pa.B. 6492 (November 2, 2013), in the Atlantic Reporter (Third Series Advance Sheets, Vol. 77, No. 3, December 6, 2013), and on the Supreme Court's web-page, and an Explanatory Report to be published with this Order:
It Is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that the modifications to Rules 1120, 1210, 1240, 1242, 1330, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611, and 1635 and the adoption of new Rule 1149 of the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure are approved in the following form.
This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective October 1, 2015.
Annex A
TITLE 237. JUVENILE RULES
PART I. RULES
Subpart B. DEPENDENCY MATTERS
CHAPTER 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS
PART A. BUSINESS OF COURTS Rule 1120. Definitions.
* * * * * COURT is the Court of Common Pleas, a court of record, which is assigned to hear dependency matters. Court shall include masters when they are permitted to hear cases under these rules. Juvenile court shall have the same meaning as court.
DILIGENT EFFORTS are the comprehensive and ongoing efforts made to identify and locate adult relatives and kin for a child until the permanency goal is achieved.
EDUCATIONAL DECISION MAKER is a responsible adult appointed by the court to make decisions regarding a child's education when the child has no guardian or the court has limited the guardian's right to make such decisions for the child. The educational decision maker acts as the child's representative concerning all matters regarding education unless the court specifically limits the authority of the educational decision maker.
FAMILY FINDING is the ongoing diligent efforts of the county agency, or its contracted providers, to search for and identify adult relatives and kin, and engage them in the county agency's social service planning and delivery of services, including gaining commitment from relatives and kin to support a child or guardian receiving county agency services.
FAMILY SERVICE PLAN is the document in which the county agency sets forth the service objectives for a family and services to be provided to a family by the county agency.
GUARDIAN is any parent, custodian, or other person who has legal custody of a child, or person designated by the court to be a temporary guardian for purposes of a proceeding.
HEALTH CARE is care related to any medical need including physical, mental, and dental health. This term is used in the broadest sense to include any type of health need.
JUDGE is a judge of the Court of Common Pleas.
JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICER is a person who has been appointed by the court or employed by a county's juvenile probation office, and who has been properly commissioned by being sworn in as an officer of the court to exercise the powers and duties set forth in Rule 195, the Juvenile Act, and the Child Protective Services Law.
KIN is a relative of the child through blood or marriage, godparent of the child as recognized through an organized church, a member of the child's tribe or clan, or someone who has a significant positive relationship with the child or the child's family.
KINSHIP CARE is the full-time nurturing and protection of a child who is separated from the child's guardian and placed in the home of a caregiver who has an existing relationship with the child and/or the child's family.
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER is any person who is by law given the power to enforce the law when acting within the scope of that person's employment.
* * * * *
Comment * * * * * An ''educational decision maker'' is to be appointed by court order. The scope of the appointment is limited to decisions regarding the child's education. The educational decision maker acts as the child's spokesperson on all matters regarding education unless the court specifically limits the authority of the educational decision maker. The educational decision maker holds educational and privacy rights as the child's guardian for purposes of 20 U.S.C. § 1232g and 34 C.F.R. § 99.3. See also Rule 1147(C) for the duties and responsibilities of an educational decision maker.
The definition of ''family finding'' is derived from 62 P. S. § 1302.
Diligence is to include utilizing reasonable resources available when engaging in family finding, never ceasing efforts until multiple relatives and kin are identified, and going beyond basic searching tools by exploring alternative tools and methodologies. ''Diligent efforts'' is to include, but not limited to, interviews with immediate and extended family and kin, genograms, eco-mapping, case mining, cold calls, and specialized computer searches.
It is insufficient to complete only a basic computer search or attempt to contact known relatives at a last-known address or phone number.
For multiple resources efforts that may be utilized, see Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children, Youth and Families Bulletin, No. 3130-12-03, issued May 11, 2012, effective July 1, 2013; Seneca Family Finding, which may be found at www.familyfinding.org, or Legal Services Initiative, diligent search packet, Statewide Adoption and Permanency Network, which may be found at www.diakon-swan.org.
Supporting a child under the definition of ''family finding'' means any type of aid, including but not limited to emotional, financial, physical, or psychological aid.
See also 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 675 (Fostering Connections) to comply with state and federal regulations.
For the family service plan, see 55 Pa. Code § 3130.61.
* * * * * Official Note: Rule 1120 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended March 19, 2009, effective June 1, 2009. Amended December 24, 2009, effective immediately. Amended April 21, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended May 20, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended June 24, 2013, effective January 1, 2014. Amended October 21, 2013, effective December 1, 2013. Amended July 28, 2014, effective September 29, 2014. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1120 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
PART B(1). EDUCATION [AND], HEALTH, AND WELFARE OF CHILD (Editor's Note: The following rule is new and printed in regular type to enhance readability.)
Rule 1149. Family Finding.
A. Court's inquiry and determination.
1) The court shall inquire as to the efforts made by the county agency to comply with the family finding requirements pursuant to 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq.
2) The court shall place its determinations on the record as to whether the county agency has reasonably engaged in family finding.
B. Discontinued family finding. Family finding may be discontinued only if, after a hearing, the court has made a specific determination that:
1) continued family finding no longer serves the best interests of the child;
2) continued family finding is a threat to the child's safety; or
3) the child is in a preadoptive placement and the court proceedings to adopt the child have been commenced pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. Part III (relating to adoption).
C. Resuming family finding. The county agency shall resume family finding when the court determines that resuming family finding:
1) is best suited to the safety, protection and physical, mental, and moral welfare of the child; and
2) does not pose a threat to the child's safety.
Comment Pursuant to paragraph (A), efforts by the county agency may include, but are not limited to whether the county agency is or will be: a) searching for and locating adult relatives and kin; b) identifying and building positive connections between the child and the child's relatives and kin; c) when appropriate: i) supporting the engagement of relatives and kin in social service planning and delivery of services; and ii) creating a network of extended family support to assist in remedying the concerns that led to the child becoming involved with the county agency; d) when possible, maintaining family connections; and e) when in the best interests of the child and when possible, keeping siblings together in care.
The extent to which the county agency is involved in the case when a child is still in the home is dependent on several variables and specific to each case. In some instances, the county agency is more involved and actively engaged in family finding because the child needs support services or could be removed from the home. The search in these instances is used to find resources to help keep the child in the home by preventing removal, or to find resources if removal becomes necessary.
See 62 P. S. § 1301 for legislative intent regarding family finding and promotion of kinship care.
Family finding is required for every child when a child is accepted for services by the county agency. See 62 P. S. § 1302. It is best practice to find as many kin as possible for each child. These kin may help with care or support for the child. The county agency should ask the guardian, the child, and siblings about relatives or other adults in the child's life, including key supporters of the child or guardians.
Specific evidence should be provided indicating the steps taken to locate and engage relatives and kin. See Comment to Rule 1120 regarding diligent efforts considerations for locating relatives and kin. When considering the method by which relatives and kin are engaged in service planning and delivery, courts and the parties are encouraged to be creative. Strategies of engagement could include, but are not limited to, inviting relatives and kin to: 1) be involved in a family group decision making conference, family team conferencing, or other family meetings aimed at developing or supporting the family service plan; 2) assist with visitation; 3) assist with transportation; 4) provide respite or child care services; or 5) provide actual kinship care.
Pursuant to paragraph (A)(2), the court is to place its determinations on the record as to whether the county has reasonably engaged in family finding. The level of reasonableness is to be determined by the length of the case and time the county agency has had to begin or continue the process. For example, at the shelter care hearing, the county agency should at least ask the question whether there is family or kin available as a resource. The initial removal of the child is the most critical time in the case. Potential trauma should be considered and ameliorated by family finding efforts as much as possible. Phone calls at this time are reasonable. However, at the dispositional or permanency hearings, the county agency has had more time to engage in a more thorough diligent search as discussed infra. See also Rule 1120 and its Comment.
The court's inquiry and determination regarding family finding should be made at each stage of the case, including, but not limited to the entry of an order for protective custody, shelter care hearing, adjudicatory hearing, dispositional hearing, and permanency hearing. See Rules 1210, 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611, and their Comments.
Paragraph (B)(3) is meant to include notice of intent to adopt, petition to adopt, or voluntary relinquishment of parental rights, or consent to adopt.
Official Note: Rule 1149 adopted July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
Final Report explaining the provisions to Rule 1149 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
CHAPTER 12. COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS, EMERGENCY CUSTODY, AND PRE-ADJUDICATORY PLACEMENT
PART B. EMERGENCY CUSTODY Rule 1210. Order for Protective Custody.
A. Application of order. The application for a court order of protective custody may be orally made; however, the request shall be reduced to writing within twenty-four hours. The request shall set forth reasons for the need of protective custody.
B. Finding of court.
1) A child may be taken into protective custody by court order when the court determines that removal of the child is necessary for the welfare and best interests of the child.
2) At the time the court issues a protective custody order, the court shall inquire as to whether family finding efforts pursuant to Rule 1149 have been initiated by the county agency.
3) The order may initially be oral, provided that it is reduced to writing within twenty-four hours or the next court business day.
C. Law enforcement. The court may authorize a search of the premises by law enforcement or the county agency so that the premises may be entered into without authorization of the owner for the purpose of taking a child into protective custody.
[D. Execution of order. The court shall specify:
1) the limitations of the order;
2) the manner in which the order is to be executed; and
3) who shall execute the order.
E.] D. Contents of order. The court order shall include:
1) the name of the child sought to be protected;
2) the date of birth of the child, if known;
3) the whereabouts of the child, if known;
4) the names and addresses of the guardians;
5) the reasons for taking the child into protective custody;
6) a finding whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent placement of the child; [and]
7) a finding whether the reasons for keeping the child in shelter care and that remaining in the home is contrary to the welfare and best interests of the child[.]; and
8) findings and orders related to the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding.
E. Execution of order. The court shall specify:
1) the limitations of the order;
2) the manner in which the order is to be executed; and
3) who shall execute the order.
Comment See 42 Pa.C.S. § 6324 for statutory provisions concerning taking into custody.
For a discussion of the due process requirements for taking a child into emergency custody, see Patterson v. Armstrong County Children and Youth Services, 141 F. Supp. 2d 512 (W.D. Pa. 2001).
The court is to determine whether reasonable efforts, including services and family finding efforts, were made to prevent placement or in the case of an emergency placement where services were not offered and could not have prevented the necessity of placement, whether this level of effort was reasonable due to the emergency nature of the situation, safety considerations and circumstances of the family. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6332.
See also In re Petition to Compel Cooperation with Child Abuse Investigation, 875 A.2d 365 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2005).
Pursuant to paragraph (D)(8), the county agency should be looking for family and kin as a resource to aid and assist the family to prevent removal of the child from the home. When removal of the child is necessary, placement with family and kin will help reduce the potential trauma of the removal from the home. See Rule 1149 regarding family finding requirements.
Official Note: Rule 1210 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1210 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
PART C. SHELTER CARE Rule 1240. Shelter Care Application.
* * * * * B. Application contents. Every shelter care application shall set forth:
* * * * * 6) a statement detailing family finding efforts and:
* * * * *
Comment * * * * * Pursuant to paragraph (B)(6), the application is to contain a statement detailing the reasonable efforts made to prevent placement and the specific reasons why there are no less restrictive alternatives available. This statement may include information such as: 1) the circumstances of the case; 2) family finding efforts made by the county agency; 3) contact with family members or other kin; [3)] 4) the child's educational, health care, and disability needs; and [4)] 5) any need for emergency actions.
See Rule 1149 regarding family finding requirements.
Official Note: Rule 1240 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1240 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1242. Shelter Care Hearing.
* * * * * C. Findings. The court shall determine whether:
1) there are sufficient facts in support of the shelter care application;
2) the county agency has reasonably engaged in family finding;
[2)] 3) custody of the child is warranted after consideration of the following factors:
a) remaining in the home would be contrary to the welfare and best interests of the child;
b) reasonable efforts were made by the county agency to prevent the child's placement;
c) the child's placement is the least restrictive placement that meets the needs of the child, supported by reasons why there are no less restrictive alternatives available; and
d) the lack of efforts was reasonable in the case of an emergency placement where services were not offered;
[3)] 4) a person, other than the county agency, submitting a shelter care application, is a party to the proceedings; and
[4)] 5) there are any special needs of the child that have been identified and that the court deems necessary to address while the child is in shelter care.
D. Prompt hearing. The court shall conduct a hearing within seventy-two hours of taking the child into protective custody.
E. Court order. At the conclusion of the shelter care hearing, the court shall enter a written order [set] setting forth:
1) its findings pursuant to paragraph (C);
2) any conditions placed upon any party;
3) any orders regarding family finding pursuant to Rule 1149;
[3)] 4) any orders for placement or temporary care of the child;
[4)] 5) any findings or orders necessary to ensure the stability and appropriateness of the child's education, and when appropriate, the court shall appoint an educational decision maker pursuant to Rule 1147;
[5)] 6) any findings or orders necessary to identify, monitor, and address the child's needs concerning health care and disability, if any, and if parental consent cannot be obtained, authorize evaluations and treatment needed; and
[6)] 7) any orders of visitation.
Comment Pursuant to paragraph (B)(4), it is expected that the parties be present. Only upon good cause shown should advanced communication technology be utilized.
Pursuant to paragraph (C), the court is to make a determination that the evidence presented with the shelter care application under Rule 1240 is supported by sufficient facts. After this determination, the court is to determine whether the custody of the child is warranted by requiring a finding that: 1) remaining in the home would be contrary to the health and welfare of the child; 2) reasonable efforts were made by the county agency to prevent the placement of the child; 3) the child was placed in the least restrictive placement available; and 4) if the child was taken into emergency placement without services being offered, the lack of efforts by the county agency was reasonable. Additionally, the court is to state the reasons why there are no less restrictive alternatives available.
Family finding is to be initiated prior to the shelter care hearing. See Comment to Rule 1149 as to level of reasonableness.
Pursuant to paragraph (C)(2), the court is to make a determination whether the county agency has reasonably engaged or is to engage in family finding in the case. The county agency will be required to report its diligent family finding efforts at subsequent hearings. See Rule 1149 for requirements of family finding. See also Rules 1408(2), 1512(D)(1)(h), 1514(A)(4), 1608(D)(1)(h), and 1610(D) and their Comments for the court's findings as to the county agency's satisfaction of the family finding requirements and Rules 1210(D), 1409(C) and 1609(D) and Comments to Rules 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611 on the court's orders.
Pursuant to paragraph [(C)(3)] (C)(4), the court is to determine whether or not a person is a proper party to the proceedings. Regardless of the court's findings on the party status, the court is to determine if the application is supported by sufficient evidence.
* * * * * Official Note: Rule 1242 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended April 21, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1242 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
CHAPTER 13. PRE-ADJUDICATORY PROCEDURES
PART C. PETITION Rule 1330. Petition: Filing, Contents, Function, Aggravated Circumstances.
* * * * * B. Petition contents. Every petition shall set forth plainly:
1) the name of the petitioner;
2) the name, date of birth, and address of the child, if known;
3) the name and address of the child's guardian, or if unknown, the name and address of the nearest adult relative;
4) if a child is Native American, the child's Native American history or affiliation with a tribe;
5) a statement that:
a) it is in the best interest of the child and the public that the proceedings be brought;
b) the child is or is not currently under the supervision of the county agency;
6) a statement detailing family finding efforts and, if the county agency is seeking placement:
a) the reasonable efforts made to prevent placement; and
b) why there are no less restrictive alternatives available;
[6)] 7) a concise statement of facts in support of the allegations for which the petition has been filed;
a) facts for each allegation shall be set forth separately;
b) the relevant statute or code section shall be set forth specifically for each allegation;
[7)] 8) a verification by the petitioner that the facts set forth in the petition are true and correct to the petitioner's personal knowledge, information, or belief, and that any false statements are subject to the penalties of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities;
[8)] 9) the signature of the petitioner and the date of the execution of the petition; and
[9)] 10) the whereabouts of the child unless disclosure is prohibited by court order and if taken into custody, the date and time thereof.
C. Aggravated circumstances. A motion for finding of aggravated circumstances may be brought in the petition pursuant to Rule 1701(A).
Comment Petitions should be filed without unreasonable delay.
Under paragraph (A)(2), a petition is to be filed twenty-four hours after the shelter care hearing if the requirements of (A)(2)(a) and (b) are met. Rule 1800 suspends 42 Pa.C.S. § 6331 only as to the time requirement of when a petition is to be filed.
Additionally, paragraph (A)(2) requires that the county agency file a petition. Any other person, other than the county agency, is to file an application to file a petition under Rule 1320. Rule 1800 suspends 42 Pa.C.S. § 6334, which provides any person may file a petition.
For the safety or welfare of a child or a guardian, the court may order that the addresses of the child or a guardian not be disclosed to specified individuals.
Pursuant to paragraph (B)(6), when the county agency is seeking placement, the petition is to include the reasonable efforts made to prevent placement, including efforts for family finding, and why there are no less restrictive alternatives available. See Rule 1149 for family finding requirements. See also Rule 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1409, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611 for reasonable efforts determinations.
If a petition is filed after the county agency has discontinued family finding for non-court cases, the county agency is to aver reasons for the discontinuance in the petition. See 62 P. S. § 1302.2(a).
A motion for finding of aggravated circumstances may be brought in a dependency petition. See Rule 1701(A). If aggravated circumstances are determined to exist after the filing of a petition, a written motion is to be filed pursuant to Rules 1701 and 1344.
The aggravated circumstances, as defined by 42 Pa.C.S. § 6302, are to be specifically identified in the motion for finding of aggravated circumstances.
Official Note: Rule 1330 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1330 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
CHAPTER 14. ADJUDICATORY HEARING Rule 1408. Findings on Petition.
[After] The court shall enter findings, within seven days of hearing the evidence on the petition or accepting stipulated facts by the parties [but no later than seven days, the court shall enter a finding]:
1) by specifying which, if any, allegations in the petition were proved by clear and convincing evidence[.]; and
2) its findings as to whether the county agency has reasonably engaged in family finding as required pursuant to Rule 1149.
Comment The court is to specify which allegations in the petition are the bases for the finding of dependency.
Pursuant to paragraph (2), the court is to make a determination whether the county agency has reasonably engaged in family finding in the case. The county agency will be required to report its diligent family finding efforts at subsequent hearings. See Rule 1149 for requirements of family finding. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), 1512(D)(1)(h), 1514(A)(4), 1608(D)(1)(h), and 1610(D) and their Comments for the court's findings as to the county agency's satisfaction of the family finding requirements and Rules 1242(E)(3), 1409(C), 1609(D), and 1611(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611 on the court's orders.
Official Note: Rule 1408 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1408 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1409. Adjudication of Dependency and Court Order.
* * * * * C. Court order. The court shall include the following in its court order:
* * * * * 3) Any orders as to any aids in disposition that may assist in the preparation of the dispositional hearing, including orders regarding family finding.
Comment * * * * * See also 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6341 & 6302.
Pursuant to paragraph (C)(3), when making its determination for reasonable efforts made by the county agency, the court is to consider the extent to which the county agency has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Rule 1149 regarding family finding. See also Rules 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c) and 1330(B)(6) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1330, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611 for reasonable efforts determinations.
If the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding have not been met, the court is to make necessary orders to ensure compliance by enforcing this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1242(E)(3) and 1609(D) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611.
Official Note: Rule 1409 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1409 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
CHAPTER 15. DISPOSITIONAL HEARING
PART B. DISPOSITIONAL HEARING AND AIDS Rule 1512. Dispositional Hearing.
* * * * * C. Duties of the court. The court shall determine on the record [that] whether the parties have been advised of the following:
1) the right to file an appeal;
2) the time limits for an appeal; and
3) the right to counsel to prepare the appeal.
D. Court's findings. The court shall enter its findings and conclusions of law into the record and enter an order pursuant to Rule 1515.
1) On the record in open court, the court shall state:
a) its disposition;
b) the reasons for its disposition;
c) the terms, conditions, and limitations of the disposition;
d) the name of any person or the name, type, category, or class of agency, licensed organization, or institution that shall provide care, shelter, and supervision of the child;
e) whether any evaluations, tests, counseling, or treatments are necessary;
f) the permanency plan for the child;
g) the services necessary to achieve the permanency plan;
h) whether the county agency has reasonably satisfied the requirement of Rule 1149 regarding family finding, and if not, the findings and conclusions of the court on why the requirements have not been met by the county agency;
[h)] i) any findings necessary to ensure the stability and appropriateness of the child's education, and when appropriate, the court shall appoint an educational decision maker pursuant to Rule 1147;
[i)] j) any findings necessary to identify, monitor, and address the child's needs concerning health care and disability, if any, and if parental consent cannot be obtained, authorize evaluations and treatment needed; and
[j)] k) a visitation schedule, including any limitations.
2) The court shall state on the record in open court or enter into the record through the dispositional order, [a finding] findings pursuant to Rule 1514, if the child is placed[, that;].
[a) remaining in the home would be contrary to the welfare, safety, or health of the child;
b) reasonable efforts were made by the county agency to prevent the child's placement;
c) the child's placement is the least restrictive placement that meets the needs of the child, supported by reasons why there are no less restrictive alternatives available; and
d) if preventive services were not offered due to the necessity of an emergency placement, that such lack of services was reasonable under the circumstances.]
Comment * * * * * Rule 1608 mandates permanency hearings at least every six months. It is best practice to have three-month hearings to ensure permanency is achieved in a timely fashion and the court is informed of the progress of the case. See Comment to Rule 1608.
Pursuant to paragraph (D)(1)(h), the court is to determine whether the county agency has reasonably satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding. If the county agency has failed to meet the diligent family finding efforts requirements of Rule 1149, the court is to utilize its powers to enforce this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), 1409(C), 1609(D), and 1611(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611.
Pursuant to paragraph [(D)(1)(h)] (D)(1)(i), the court is to address the child's educational stability, including the right to an educational decision maker, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301, 20 U.S.C. § 1439(a)(5), and 34 C.F.R. § 300.519. The court's findings should address the child's right to: 1) educational stability, including the right to: a) remain in the same school regardless of a change in placement when it is in the child's best interest; b) immediate enrollment when a school change is in the child's best interest; and c) have school proximity considered in all placement changes, 42 U.S.C. §§ 675(1)(G) and 11431 et seq.; 2) an educational decision maker pursuant to Rule 1147, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301, 20 U.S.C. § 1439(a)(5), and 34 C.F.R. § 300.519; 3) an appropriate education, including any necessary special education, early intervention, or remedial services pursuant to 24 P. S. §§ 13-1371 and 13-1372, 55 Pa. Code § 3130.87, and 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.; 4) the educational services necessary to support the child's transition to independent living pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351 if the child is sixteen or older; and 5) a transition plan that addresses the child's educational needs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(H) if the child will age out of care within ninety days.
Pursuant to paragraph [(D)(1)(i)] (D)(1)(j), the court is to address the child's needs concerning health care and disability. The court's findings should address the right of: 1) a child to receive timely and medically appropriate screenings and health care services pursuant to 55 Pa. Code §§ 3700.51 and 3800.32, and 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r); 2) a child to a transition plan that addresses the child's health care needs, and includes specific options for how the child can obtain health insurance after leaving care pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(H) if the child will age out of care within 90 days; and 3) a child with disabilities to receive necessary accommodations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132; 28 C.F.R. § 35.101 et seq., Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and implementing regulations at 45 C.F.R. § 84.1 et seq. In addition, the court is to ensure progress and compliance with the child's case plan for the ongoing oversight and coordination of health care services under 42 U.S.C. § 622(b)(15).
Pursuant to the Juvenile Act, the court has authority to order a physical or mental examination of a child and medical or surgical treatment of a minor, who is suffering from a serious physical condition or illness which requires prompt treatment in the opinion of a physician. The court may order the treatment even if the guardians have not been given notice of the pending hearing, are not available, or without good cause inform the court that they do not consent to the treatment. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6339(b).
Pursuant to paragraph [(D)(1)(j)] (D)(1)(k), the court is to include siblings in its visitation schedule. See 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(31), which requires reasonable efforts be made to place siblings together unless it is contrary to the safety or well-being of either sibling and that frequent visitation be assured if joint placement cannot be made.
See Rule 1127 for recording and transcribing of proceedings.
See Rule 1136 for ex parte communications.
Official Note: Rule 1512 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended April 21, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1512 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1514. Dispositional Finding Before Removal from Home.
A. Required findings. Prior to entering a dispositional order removing a child from the home, the court shall state on the record in open court the following specific findings:
1) Continuation of the child in the home would be contrary to the welfare, safety, or health of the child;
2) The child's placement is the least restrictive placement that meets the needs of the child, supported by reasons why there is no less restrictive alternative available; [and]
3) If the child has a sibling who is subject to removal from the home, whether reasonable efforts were made prior to the placement of the child to place the siblings together or whether such joint placement is contrary to the safety or well-being of the child or sibling;
4) The county agency has reasonably satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding; and
[3)] 5) One of the following:
a) Reasonable efforts were made prior to the placement of the child to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from the home, if the child has remained in the home pending such disposition; or
b) If preventive services were not offered due to the necessity for emergency placement, whether such lack of services was reasonable under the circumstances; or
c) If the court previously determined that reasonable efforts were not made to prevent the initial removal of the child from the home, whether reasonable efforts are under way to make it possible for the child to return home.
B. Aggravated circumstances. If the court has previously found aggravated circumstances to exist and that reasonable efforts to remove the child from the home or to preserve and reunify the family are not required, a finding under paragraphs [(A)(3)(a)] (A)(5)(a) through (c) is not necessary.
Comment See 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(b).
Pursuant to paragraph (A)(3), the court is to utilize reasonable efforts in placing siblings together unless it is contrary to the safety or well-being of a child or sibling. 42 U.S.C. § 675 (Fostering Connections).
Pursuant to paragraph (A)(4), the court is to determine whether the county agency has reasonably satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding. If the county agency has failed to meet the diligent family finding efforts requirements of Rule 1149, the court is to utilize its powers to enforce this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), 1409(C), 1609(D), and 1611(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611.
Official Note: Rule 1514 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1514 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1515. Dispositional Order.
* * * * *
Comment See 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 6310, 6351.
When issuing a dispositional order, the court should issue an order that is ''best suited to the safety, protection, and physical, mental, and moral welfare of the child.'' 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(a). See In re S.J., 906 A.2d 547, 551 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006) (citing In re Tameka M., 525 Pa. 348, 580 A.2d 750 (1990)), for issues addressing a child's mental and moral welfare.
When making its determination for reasonable efforts made by the county agency, the court is to consider the extent to which the county agency has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Rule 1149 regarding family finding. See also Rules 1240(B)(6), 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c), and 1330(B)(6) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1330, 1409, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611 for reasonable efforts determinations.
If the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding have not been met, the court is to make necessary orders to ensure compliance by enforcing this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), 1409(C), 1609(D), and 1611(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1608, 1609, 1610, and 1611. 45 C.F.R. § 1356.21 provides a specific foster care provider may not be placed in a court order to be in compliance with and receive funding through the Federal Financial Participation.
Dispositional orders should comport in substantial form and content to the [Juvenile Court Judges' Commission model orders] model orders to receive funding under the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) of 1997 (P. L. 105-89). The model forms are also in compliance with Title IV-B and Title IV-E of the Social Security Act. For model orders, see [http://www.jcjc.state.pa.us or http://www.dpw.state.pa.us or request a copy on diskette directly from the Juvenile Court Judges' Commission, Room 401, Finance Building, Harrisburg, PA 17120] http://www.pacourts.us/forms/dependency-forms.
See In re Tameka M., 525 Pa. 348, 580 A.2d 750 (1990).
Official Note: Rule 1515 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1515 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
CHAPTER 16. POST-DISPOSITIONAL PROCEDURES
PART B(2). PERMANENCY HEARING Rule 1608. Permanency Hearing.
* * * * * D. Court's findings.
1) Findings at all six-month hearings. At the permanency hearing, the court shall enter its findings and conclusions of law into the record and enter an order pursuant to Rule 1609. On the record in open court, the court shall state:
a) the appropriateness of the placement;
b) the appropriateness, feasibility, and extent of compliance with the permanency plan developed for the child;
c) the appropriateness and feasibility of the current placement goal for the child;
d) the likely date by which the placement goal for the child might be achieved;
e) whether reasonable efforts were made to finalize the permanency plan in effect;
f) whether the county agency has made services available to the guardian, and if not, why those services have not been made available;
g) the continued appropriateness of the permanency plan and the concurrent plan;
h) whether the county agency has satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding, and if not, the findings and conclusions of the court on why the requirements have not been met by the county agency;
[h)] i) whether the child is safe;
[i)] j) if the child has been placed outside the Commonwealth, whether the placement continues to be best suited to the safety, protection, and physical, mental, and moral welfare of the child;
[j)] k) the services needed to assist a child who is sixteen years of age or older to make the transition to independent living, including:
i) the specific independent living services or instructions that are currently being provided by the county agency or private provider;
ii) the areas of need in independent living instruction that have been identified by the independent living assessment completed pursuant to the Chafee Act, 42 U.S.C. § 671 et seq.;
iii) the independent living services that the child will receive prior to the next permanency review hearing;
iv) whether the child is in the least restrictive, most family-like setting that will enable him to develop independent living skills;
v) the efforts that have been made to develop and maintain connections with supportive adults regardless of placement type;
vi) whether the child is making adequate educational progress to graduate from high school or whether the child is enrolled in another specified educational program that will assist the child in achieving self-sufficiency;
vii) the job readiness services that have been provided to the child and the employment/career goals that have been established;
viii) whether the child has physical health or behavioral health needs that will require continued services into adulthood; and
ix) the steps being taken to ensure that the youth will have stable housing or living arrangements when discharged from care; [and]
[k)] l) any educational, health care, and disability needs of the child and the plan to ensure those needs are met[.];
m) if a sibling of a child has been removed from the home and is in a different setting than the child, whether reasonable efforts have been made to place the child and sibling of the child together or whether such joint placement is contrary to the safety or well-being of the child or sibling; and
n) if the child has a sibling, whether visitation of the child with that sibling is occurring no less than twice a month, unless a finding is made that visitation is contrary to the safety or well-being of the child or sibling.
2) Additional findings for fifteen of last twenty-two months. If the child has been in placement for fifteen of the last twenty-two months, the court may direct the county agency to file a petition to terminate parental rights.
E. Advanced communication technology. Upon good cause shown, a court may utilize advanced communication technology pursuant to Rule 1129.
F. Family Service Plan or Permanency Plan.
1) The county agency shall review the family service plan or permanency plan at least every six months, including all family finding efforts pursuant to Rule 1149.
2) The family service plan or permanency plan shall identify which relatives and kin were included in its development and the method of that inclusion.
3) If the plan is modified, the county agency shall follow the filing and service requirements pursuant to Rule 1345.
4) The parties and when requested, the court, shall be provided with the modified plan at least fifteen days prior to the permanency hearing.
Comment * * * * * Every child should have a concurrent plan, which is a secondary plan to be pursued if the primary permanency plan for the child cannot be achieved. See Comment to Rule 1512. For example, the primary plan may be reunification with the guardian. If the guardian does not substantially comply with the requirements of the court-ordered services, subsidized legal guardianship may be utilized as the concurrent plan. Because of time requirements, the concurrent plan is to be in place so that permanency may be achieved in a timely manner.
Pursuant to paragraph (D)(1)(h), the court is to determine whether the county agency has reasonably satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding, including the location and engagement of relatives and kin at least every six months, prior to each permanency hearing. If the county agency has failed to meet the diligent family finding efforts requirements of Rule 1149, the court is to utilize its powers to enforce this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), 1409(C), 1609(D), and 1611(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1609, and 1611.
When making its determination for reasonable efforts made by the county agency, the court is to consider family finding. See also Rules 1240(B)(6), 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c) and 1330(B)(6) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1330, 1409, 1515, 1609, and 1611 for reasonable efforts determinations.
Pursuant to paragraph (D)(2), a ''petition to terminate parental rights'' is a term of art used pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. § 2511 and Pa.R.O.C. Rule 15.4 to describe the motion terminating parental rights. This does not refer to the ''petition'' as defined in Pa.R.J.C.P. 1120.
* * * * * See 42 U.S.C. § [675 (5)(A)—(H)] 675(5)(A)—(H) for development of a transition plan pursuant to paragraph [(D)(1)(j)] (D)(1)(k).
* * * * * Official Note: Rule 1608 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended December 18, 2009, effective immediately. Amended April 21, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended October 21, 2013, effective December 1, 2013. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1608 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1609. Permanency Hearing Orders.
* * * * * D. Orders on family finding.
1) The court order shall indicate whether family finding efforts made by the county agency were reasonable;
2) If the family finding efforts were not reasonable, the court shall order the county agency to engage in family finding prior to the next permanency hearing;
[D.] E. Orders concerning education.
1) The court's order shall address the stability and appropriateness of the child's education; and
2) When appropriate, the court shall appoint an educational decision maker pursuant to Rule 1147.
[E.] F. Orders concerning health care and disability.
1) The court's order shall identify, monitor, and address the child's needs concerning health care and disability; and
2) The court's orders shall authorize evaluations and treatment if parental consent cannot be obtained.
[F.] G. Guardians. The permanency order shall include any conditions, limitations, restrictions, and obligations imposed upon the guardian.
Comment When issuing a permanency order, the court should issue an order that is ''best suited to the safety, protection, and physical, mental, and moral welfare of the child.'' 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(a). See In re S.J., 906 A.2d 547, 551 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006) (citing In re Tameka M., 525 Pa. 348, 580 A.2d 750 (1990)), for issues addressing a child's mental and moral welfare.
Pursuant to paragraph (D), when making its determination for reasonable efforts made by the county agency, the court is to consider the extent to which the county agency has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Rule 1149 regarding family finding. See also Rules 1240(B)(6), 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c), and 1330(B)(6) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1330, 1409, 1515, 1608, 1610, and 1611 for reasonable efforts determinations.
If the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding have not been met, the court is to make necessary orders to ensure compliance by enforcing this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), and 1409(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1610, and 1611.
Pursuant to paragraph [(D)] (E), the court's order is to address the child's educational stability, including the right to an educational decision maker. The order should address the child's right to: 1) educational stability, including the right to: a) remain in the same school regardless of a change in placement when it is in the child's best interest; b) immediate enrollment when a school change is in the child's best interest; and c) have school proximity considered in all placement changes, 42 U.S.C. §§ 675(1)(G) and 11431 et seq.; 2) an educational decision maker pursuant to Rule 1147, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301, 20 U.S.C. § 1439(a)(5), and 34 C.F.R. § 300.519; 3) an appropriate education, including any necessary special education, early intervention, or remedial services pursuant to 24 P. S. §§ 13-1371 and 13-1372, 55 Pa. Code § 3130.87, and 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.; 4) the educational services necessary to support the child's transition to independent living pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351 if the child is sixteen or older; and 5) a transition plan that addresses the child's educational needs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(H) if the child will age out of care within ninety days.
Pursuant to paragraph [(E)] (F), the court's order is to address the child's needs concerning health care and disability. The order should address the right of: 1) a child to receive timely and medically appropriate screenings and health care services pursuant to 55 Pa. Code §§ 3700.51 and 3800.32 and 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r); 2) a child to a transition plan that addresses the child's health care needs, and includes specific options for how the child can obtain health insurance after leaving care pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(H) if the child will age out of care within ninety days; and 3) a child with disabilities to receive necessary accommodations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12132; 28 C.F.R. § 35.101 et seq., Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and implementing regulations at 45 C.F.R. § 84.1 et seq. In addition, the court is to ensure progress and compliance with the child's case plan for the ongoing oversight and coordination of health care services under 42 U.S.C. § 622(b)(15).
Pursuant to the Juvenile Act, the court has authority to order a physical or mental examination of a child and medical or surgical treatment of a minor, who is suffering from a serious physical condition or illness which requires prompt treatment in the opinion of a physician. The court may order the treatment even if the guardians have not been given notice of the pending hearing, are not available, or without good cause inform the court that they do not consent to the treatment. 42 Pa.C.S. § 6339(b).
See Rule 1611 for permanency hearing orders for children over the age of eighteen.
Official Note: Rule 1609 adopted August 21, 2006, effective February 1, 2007. Amended April 29, 2011, effective July 1, 2011. Amended October 21, 2013, effective December 1, 2013. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1609 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1610. Permanency Hearing for Children over Eighteen.
A. Purpose and timing of hearing. For every case for children over the age of eighteen, the court shall conduct a permanency hearing at least every six months for purposes of determining:
* * * * * 2) whether the transition plan of the child is consistent with Rule [1631 (E)(2)] 1631(E)(2);
* * * * * D. Court's findings. At the permanency hearing, the court shall enter its findings and conclusions of law into the record and enter an order pursuant to Rule 1611. The court shall make a determination whether the county agency has satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding, and if not, the findings and conclusions of the court on why the requirements have not been met by the county agency.
Comment * * * * * See Rule 1128 regarding presence at proceedings and Rule 1136 regarding ex parte communications.
Pursuant to paragraph (D), the court is to determine whether the county agency has reasonably satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding, including the location and engagement of relatives and kin at least every six months, prior to each permanency hearing. If the county agency has failed to meet the diligent family finding efforts requirements of Rule 1149, the court is to utilize its powers to enforce this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), 1409(C), 1609(D), and 1611(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, and 1611.
When making its determination for reasonable efforts made by the county agency, the court is to consider family finding. See also Rules 1240(B)(6), 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c) and 1330(B)(6) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1330, 1409, 1515, 1608, 1609, and 1611 for reasonable efforts determinations.
When the court has resumed jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 1635, the court is to schedule regular permanency hearings. The county agency is to develop a new transition plan for the child.
Official Note: Adopted October 21, 2013, effective December 1, 2013. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1610 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
Rule 1611. Permanency Hearing Orders for Children over Eighteen.
A. Court order. After every permanency hearing for children over the age of eighteen, the court shall issue a written order, which provides whether the transition plan is best suited to the safety, protection, and physical, mental, and moral welfare of the child.
B. Determinations made. The court's order shall reflect the determinations made pursuant to Rule 1610(D).
C. Orders on family finding.
1) The court order shall indicate whether family finding efforts made by the county agency were reasonable;
2) If the family finding efforts were not reasonable, the court shall order the county agency to engage in family finding prior to the next permanency hearing;
[C.] D. Orders concerning education. The court's order shall address the stability and appropriateness of the child's education, if applicable, including whether an educational decision maker is appropriate.
[D.] E. Orders concerning health care and disability.
1) The court's order shall identify, monitor, and address the child's needs concerning health care and disability; and
2) The court's orders may authorize evaluations and treatment.
Comment When issuing a permanency order, the court should issue an order that is ''best suited to the safety, protection, and physical, mental, and moral welfare of the child.'' 42 Pa.C.S. § 6351(a). See In re S.J., 906 A.2d 547, 551 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006) (citing In re Tameka M., 525 Pa. 348, 580 A.2d 750 (1990)), for issues addressing a child's mental and moral welfare.
Pursuant to paragraph (C), when making its determination for reasonable efforts made by the county agency, the court is to consider the extent to which the county agency has fulfilled its obligation pursuant to Rule 1149 regarding family finding. See also Rules 1240(B)(6), 1242(C)(2) & (3)(b) & (c), and 1330(B)(6) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1330, 1409, 1515, 1608, 1609, and 1610 for reasonable efforts determinations.
If the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding have not been met, the court is to make necessary orders to ensure compliance by enforcing this legislative mandate. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq. See also Rules 1210(D)(8), 1242(E)(3), and 1409(C) and Comments to Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, and 1610.
Pursuant to paragraph [(C)] (D), the court's order is to address the child's educational stability, including the right to an educational decision maker. The intent of this paragraph is to ensure that the inquiry regarding the appointment of an educational decision maker is considered. Federal and state law requires educational decision makers until the age of twenty-one if an educational decision maker is necessary. See Comment to Rule [1609(D)] 1609(E) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.320(c).
Pursuant to paragraph [(D)] (E), the court's order is to address the child's needs concerning health care and disability. See Comment to Rule [1609(E)] 1609(F).
Official Note: Adopted October 21, 2013, effective December 1, 2013. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1611 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
PART D. CESSATION OR RESUMPTION OF COURT SUPERVISION OR JURISDICTION Rule 1635. Hearing on Motion for Resumption of Jurisdiction.
* * * * *
Comment * * * * * A master may conduct these hearings. See Rule 1187.
If the court resumes jurisdiction, the county agency is to engage in family finding unless presently or previously discontinued pursuant to Rule 1149(B). See Rules 1608(D)(1)(h) and 1610(D) (court findings at permanency hearing whether the county agency has satisfied the requirements of Rule 1149 regarding family finding). If family finding was previously discontinued, the county agency may seek to resume family finding efforts pursuant to Rule 1149(C).
Official Note: Adopted October 21, 2013, effective December 1, 2013. Amended July 13, 2015, effective October 1, 2015.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the amendments to Rule 1635 published with the Court's Order at 45 Pa.B. 3987 (July 25, 2015).
EXPLANATORY REPORT With the enactment of Act 55 of 2013 (P. L. 169, No. 25), the county agency is required to perform family finding on an ongoing basis in every case. These rule modifications and additions reflect these requirements and ensure the court is inquiring about family finding at each proceeding and making necessary orders to ensure compliance.
Rule 1120
Diligent Efforts, Family Finding, Kin, and Kinship Care have been defined to aid the practitioner in understanding their usage throughout the Rules.
The definition of ''Family Finding,'' is derived from 62 P. S. § 1302.
The Comment to the rule provides examples of resources that may be utilized when performing diligent family finding searches. Counties should be creative when performing searches. Basic computer searches and attempting to contact relatives at last known addresses are insufficient as diligent family finding searches.
Rule 1149
This new rule sets forth the basic requirements of family finding. The court must inquire at each hearing whether the county agency has complied with the family finding requirements and whether it has been reasonably engaged in family finding. See paragraph (A).
Efforts made by the county agency should include whether it has or is currently searching for and locating adult relatives and kin; identifying and building positive connections between the child and the child's relatives and kin; when appropriate, supporting the engagement of relatives and kin in social service planning and delivery of services, and creating a network of extended family support to assist in remedying the concerns that led to the child becoming involved with the county agency; when possible, maintaining family connections; and when in the best interests of the child and when possible, keeping siblings together in care.
Paragraph (B) sets forth the requirements for discontinuing family finding and paragraph (C) provides when family finding should be resumed. See 62 P. S. § 1301 et seq.
Rule 1210
Prior to the initial removal of the child from the home, it is important to inquire whether the county agency has engaged in family finding. Reducing the initial trauma of removal from the home can be alleviated if there is an opportunity to place the child with family or kin when removal is necessary.
The county agency should be prepared to make a showing of its initial family findings efforts before the child is taken into protective custody.
The arrangement of the order of paragraphs (D) and (E) were changed. The contents of the order are now in paragraph (D) and the execution of the order is in paragraph (E).
Pursuant to paragraph (D), the court must place its findings and orders as to family finding in its court order for protective custody.
Rules 1240 & 1330
The shelter care application and the petition must include averments specifically detailing the efforts made by the county agency regarding family findings. Paragraphs (B)(6)(a) & (b) in both Rules 1240 and 1330 require averments addressing reasonable efforts made to prevent placement, including family finding efforts, and why there are no less restrictive alternatives available.
Rules 1242, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610 & 1611
The county agency is required to report its diligent family findings efforts at each hearing. The court must make findings as to the county agency's reports to ensure family finding is occurring. A part of the reasonable efforts determination to prevent placement is that the county agency is engaging in family finding. If family finding efforts are not reasonable, the court must enter necessary orders to ensure compliance.
Rule 1512
When a child is placed outside of the home, the court is required to make specific findings. To prevent confusion of the duplicative requirements of Rule 1512(D)(2) and 1514(A), the requirements were deleted from 1512(D)(2) and replaced with a reference to Rule 1514(A), which lists the required finding of the court, including the new findings for Fostering Connections pursuant to paragraph (A)(3) and family findings under paragraph (A)(4).
Rule 1514 & 1608
With Act 115 of 2010 (P. L. 1140, No. 115), the court is required to make a determination that if a sibling of a child has been removed from the home and is in a different setting than the child, whether reasonable efforts have been made to place the child and the sibling of the child together or whether such joint placement is contrary to the safety and well-being of the child or sibling.
If the siblings are not placed together, the court is to order visitation no less than twice a month unless a finding is made that visitation is contrary to the safety or well-being of the child or sibling.
Rule 1611
The references in the Comment were changed to align with the arrangement of the paragraph order in Rule 1609.
Rule 1635
The county agency is to engage in family finding in resumption of jurisdiction cases unless the case was previously discontinued pursuant to Rule 1149(B). Family finding can be resumed if the requirements of Rule 1149(C) are met.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 15-1368. Filed for public inspection July 24, 2015, 9:00 a.m.]
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
