THE COURTS
Title 234—RULES OF
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
[ 234 PA. CODE CHS. 1 AND 5 ]
Order Adopting New Rule 113.1, Amending Rules 560 and 575 and Revising the Comment to Rule 578 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure; No. 500 Criminal Procedural Rules Doc.
[48 Pa.B. 487]
[Saturday, January 20, 2018]
Order Per Curiam
And Now, this 5th day of January, 2018, upon the recommendation of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published before adoption at 47 Pa.B. 4674 (August 12, 2017), and a Final Report to be published with this Order:
It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 113.1 is adopted, Rules of Criminal Procedure 560 and 575 are amended and the Comment to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 578 is revised, in the following form.
This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective January 6, 2018.
Annex A
TITLE 234. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 1. SCOPE OF RULES, CONSTRUCTION AND DEFINITIONS, LOCAL RULES
PART A. Business of the Courts (Editor's Note: The following rule is added and printed in regular type to enhance readability.)
Rule 113.1. Confidential Information and Confidential Documents. Certification.
Unless public access is otherwise constrained by applicable authority, any attorney, or any party if unrepresented, or any affiant who files a document pursuant to these rules with the clerk of court's office shall comply with the requirements of Sections 7.0 and 8.0 of the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts (Policy). In accordance with the Policy, the filing shall include a certification of compliance with the Policy and, as necessary, a Confidential Information Form, unless otherwise specified by rule or order of court, or a Confidential Document Form. Nothing in this rule applies to any document filed with a magisterial district judge.
Comment ''Applicable authority,'' as used in this rule, includes but is not limited to statute, procedural rule, or court order. The Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts (Policy) can be found on the website of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania at: http://www.pacourts.us/public-records. The Policy is applicable to all filings by the parties or an affiant in any criminal court case.
Sections 7.0(D) and 8.0(D) of the Policy provide that the certification shall be in substantially the following form:
I certify that this filing complies with the provisions of the Public Access Policy of the Unified JudicialSystem of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts that require filing confidential information and documents differently than non-confidential information and documents.Filings may require further precautions, such as placing certain types of information in a ''Confidential Information Form.'' The Confidential Information Form and the Confidential Document Form can be found at: http://www.pacourts.us/public-records/public-records-forms. In lieu of the Confidential Information Form, Section 7.0(C) of the Policy provides for a court to adopt a rule or order permitting the filing of a document in two versions, a ''Redacted Version'' and an ''Unredacted Version.''
In addition to the restrictions above, a filing party should be cognizant of the potential impact that inclusion of personal information may have on an individual's privacy rights and security. Therefore, inclusion of such information should be done only when necessary or required to effectuate the purpose of the filing. Consideration of the use of sealing or protective orders also should be given if inclusion of such information is necessary.
While the Policy is not applicable to orders or other documents filed by a court, judges should give consideration to the privacy interests addressed by the Policy when drafting an order that might include information considered confidential under the Policy.
Official Note: New Rule 113.1 adopted January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
Final Report explaining the provisions of the new rule published with the Court's Order at 48 Pa.B. 490 (January 20, 2018).
CHAPTER 5. PRETRIAL PROCEDURES IN COURT CASES
PART F. Procedures Following a Case Held for Court Rule 560. Information: Filing, Contents, Function.
* * * * * (B) The information shall be signed by the attorney for the Commonwealth and shall be valid and sufficient in law if it contains:
* * * * * (5) a plain and concise statement of the essential elements of the offense substantially the same as or cognate to the offense alleged in the complaint; [and]
(6) a concluding statement that ''all of which is against the Act of Assembly and the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth[.]'' ; and
(7) a certification that the information complies with the provisions of the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts regarding confidential information and documents.
(C) The information shall contain the official or customary citation of the statute and section thereof, or other provision of law that the defendant is alleged therein to have violated; but the omission of or error in such citation shall not affect the validity or sufficiency of the information.
(D) In all court cases tried on an information, the issues at trial shall be defined by such information.
Comment * * * * * In any case in which there are summary offenses joined with the misdemeanor, felony, or murder charges that are held for court, the attorney for the Commonwealth must include the summary offenses in the information. See Commonwealth v. Hoffman, [406 Pa. Super. 583,] 594 A.2d 772 (Pa. Super. 1991).
See Rule 113.1 regarding the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts and the requirements regarding filings and documents that contain confidential information.
When there is an omission or error of the type referred to in paragraph (C), the information should be amended pursuant to Rule 564.
* * * * * Official Note: Rule 225 adopted February 15, 1974, effective immediately; Comment revised January 28, 1983, effective July 1, 1983; amended August 14, 1995, effective January 1, 1996; renumbered Rule 560 and amended March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; Comment revised April 23, 2004, effective immediately; Comment revised August 24, 2004, effective August 1, 2005; Comment revised March 9, 2006, effective September 1, 2006; amended June 21, 2012, effective in 180 days; amended January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the June 21, 2012 amendments to paragraph (A) concerning indicting grand juries published with the Court's Order at 42 Pa.B. 4153 (July 7, 2012).
Final Report explaining the January 5, 2018 amendment regarding the Court's public access policy published with the Court's Order at 48 Pa.B. 490 (January 20, 2018).
PART G(1). Motion Procedures Rule 575. Motions and Answers.
(A) MOTIONS
(1) All motions shall be in writing, except as permitted by the court or when made in open court during a trial or hearing.
(2) A written motion shall comply with the following requirements:
(a) The motion shall be signed by the person or attorney making the motion. The signature of an attorney shall constitute a certification that the attorney has read the motion, that to the best of the attorney's knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support the motion, and that it is not interposed for delay. The motion also shall contain a certification that the motion complies with the provisions of the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts regarding confidential information and documents.
* * * * * (B) ANSWERS
* * * * * (3) A written answer shall comply with the following requirements:
(a) The answer shall be signed by the person or attorney making the answer. The signature of an attorney shall constitute a certification that the attorney has read the answer, that to the best of the attorney's knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support the answer, and that it is not interposed for delay. The answer also shall contain a certification that the answer complies with the provisions of the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts regarding confidential information and documents.
* * * * *
Comment * * * * * Paragraph (B)(1) changes prior practice by providing that the failure to answer a motion in a criminal case never constitutes an admission. Although this prohibition applies in all cases, even those in which an answer has been ordered in a specific case or is required by the rules, the judge would have discretion to impose other appropriate sanctions if a party fails to file an answer ordered by the judge or required by the rules.
See Rule 113.1 regarding the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts and the requirements regarding filings and documents that contain confidential information.
Paragraph (C), added in 2006, sets forth the format requirements for all motions, answers, and briefs filed in criminal cases. These new format requirements are substantially the same as the format requirements in Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 124(a) and Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 204.1.
The format requirements in paragraph (C) are not intended to apply to pre-printed and computer-generated forms prepared by the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts; to charging documents; to documents routinely used by court-related agencies; or to documents routinely prepared or utilized by the courts.
Pro se defendants may submit handwritten documents that comply with the other requirements in paragraph (C) and are clearly readable.
Paragraph (D), titled ''Unified Practice,'' was added in 2004 to emphasize that local rules must not be inconsistent with the statewide rules. Although this prohibition on local rules that are inconsistent with the statewide rules applies to all criminal rules through Rule 105 (Local Rules) and Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(d), the reference to the specific prohibitions is included because these types of local rules have been identified by practitioners as creating significant impediments to the statewide practice of law within the unified judicial system. See [the first paragraph of the Rule 105 Comment] Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(d)(1). The term ''local rule'' includes every rule, regulation, directive, policy, custom, usage, form or order of general application. See [Rule 105(A)] Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(d)(1).
The prohibition on local rules mandating cover sheets was added because cover sheets are no longer necessary with the addition of the Rule 576(B)(1) requirement that the court administrator be served a copy of all motions and answers.
Although paragraph (D) precludes local rules that require a proposed order be included with a motion, a party should consider whether to include a proposed order. Proposed orders may aid the court by defining the relief requested in the motion or answer.
Official Note: Former Rule 9020 adopted October 21, 1983, effective January 1, 1984; renumbered Rule 574 and amended March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; rescinded March 3, 2004, effective July 1, 2004. Former Rule 9021 adopted October 21, 1983, effective January 1, 1984; renumbered Rule 575 and amended March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; Rules 574 and 575 combined as Rule 575 and amended March 3, 2004, effective July 1, 2004; amended July 7, 2006, effective February 1, 2007; amended January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the July 7, 2006 addition of the format requirements in paragraph (C) published with the Court's Order at 36 Pa.B. 3808 (July 22, 2006).
Final Report explaining the January 5, 2018 amendment regarding the Court's public access policy published with the Court's Order at 48 Pa.B. 490 (January 20, 2018).
Rule 578. Omnibus Pretrial Motion for Relief.
* * * * *
Comment * * * * * See Pa.R.E. 702 and 703 regarding the admissibility of scientific or expert testimony. Pa.R.E. 702 codifies Pennsylvania's adherence to the test to determine the admissibility of expert evidence first established in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) and adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Topa, 369 A.2d 1277 (Pa. 1977). Given the potential complexity when the admissibility of such evidence is challenged, such challenges should be raised in advance of trial as part of the omnibus pretrial motion if possible. However, nothing in this rule precludes such challenges from being raised in a motion in limine when circumstances necessitate it.
All motions filed pursuant to this rule are public records. However, in addition to restrictions placed by law and rule on the disclosure of confidential information, the motions are subject to the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts and may require further precautions, such as placing certain types of information in a ''Confidential Information Form'' or providing both a redacted and unredacted version of the filing. See Rule 113.1.
See Rule 113.1 regarding the Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts and the requirements regarding filings and documents that contain confidential information.
See Rule 556.4 for challenges to the array of an indicting grand jury and for motions to dismiss an information filed after a grand jury indicts a defendant.
Official Note: Formerly Rule 304, adopted June 30, 1964, effective January 1, 1965; amended and renumbered Rule 306 June 29, 1977 and November 22, 1977, effective as to cases in which the indictment or information is filed on or after January 1, 1978; amended October 21, 1983, effective January 1, 1984; Comment revised October 25, 1990, effective January 1, 1991; Comment revised August 12, 1993, effective September 1, 1993; renumbered Rule 578 and Comment revised March 1, 2000, effective April 1, 2001; Comment revised June 21, 2012, effective in 180 days; Comment revised July 31, 2012, effective November 1, 2012; Comment revised September 21, 2017, effective January 1, 2018; Comment revised January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018.
Committee Explanatory Reports:
* * * * * Final Report explaining the September 21, 2017 Comment revision regarding pretrial challenges to the admissibility of expert evidence published with the Court's Order at 47 Pa.B. 6173 (October 7, 2017).
Final Report explaining the January 5, 2018 Comment revisions regarding the Court's public access policy published with the Court's Order at 48 Pa.B. 490 (January 20, 2018).
FINAL REPORT1
New Rule 113.1; Amendments to Pa.Rs.Crim.P. 560 and 575; Revision of the Comment to
Pa.R.Crim.P. 578
Public Access Policy On January 5, 2018, effective January 6, 2018, upon the recommendation of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee, the Court adopted new Rule 113.1 (Confidential Information and Confidential Documents. Certification), amended Rules 560 (Information: Filing, Contents, Function) and 575 (Motions and Answers), and revised the Comment to Rule 578 (Omnibus Pretrial Motion for Relief) to provide correlative rule changes to assist in implementing the Court's new Public Access Policy of the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania: Case Records of the Appellate and Trial Courts (hereafter ''the new Policy'').
These rule changes are the product of the Committee's examination resulting from a directive sent by the Court to all of the Rules Committees to consider correlative rule changes to implement the new Policy. The new Policy provides that trial and appellate court case records generally are publicly accessible but contains provisions that restrict certain types of information from being included in filings. This restricted information includes personal and financial information such as Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, driver license numbers, SID numbers, minors' personal information, victims' address and contact information, etc. This restricted information is prohibited by the new Policy from being included in filings unless it is contained in a ''Confidential Information Form'' or provided in both a redacted and unredacted version of the filing. Under the new Policy, the burden of ensuring that the confidential information or documents are filed in the proper manner rests with the filer and the court or record custodian will not review or redact the filings. The new Policy recognizes that public access may also be restricted by a sealing or protective order or ''by federal law, state law, or state court rule. . . .''
Given the importance of the new Policy and the need for those working in the criminal justice system to comply with its provisions, the Committee concluded that it would be beneficial to have a specific rule referencing the policy. This rule has been numbered ''Rule 113.1,'' so that it falls after Rule 113 (Criminal Case File and Docket Entries) since both rules deal with provisions applicable to all case records. The new rule alerts filing parties to the requirements of the new Policy, in particular, the provisions regarding the inclusion of confidential information.
Due to the fact that the new Policy reflects a strong commitment to public access to most filings, the Committee also believes that filers should be more attuned to this accessibility and should limit the inclusion of personal information where possible. Therefore, the Comment to Rule 113.1 would contain an admonition that personal information should be included in a filing only where necessary and consideration given to the use of confidential information forms or sealing orders.
The Committee also noted that the restrictions on inclusion of confidential information contained in the Policy did not apply to filings by the courts but only to those made by the parties. The Committee believes that courts should comply voluntarily with similar restrictions on the inclusion of confidential information in court documents and so aspirational language is included in the Comment to Rule 113.1 that a court should be careful about including such information in its filings.
Another area of concern was the requirement that a certification of compliance with the Policy be included in most filings. The Committee concluded that filers should be alerted to this requirement and its import. The rules that contain ''contents'' provisions for documents filed by the parties will now contain a cross-reference to the new Policy and the certification requirement in particular. These cross-references are included in Rules 560 (Information: Filing, Contents, Function) and 575 (Motions and Answers). These rules contain the most clearly defined contents provisions as well as are some of the most significant filing rules for documents filed in the courts of common pleas. A similar cross-reference also has been added to Rule 578 (Omnibus Pretrial Motion for Relief). While not a content rule, it does represent a significant number of the filing in criminal cases at the common pleas level.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 18-97. Filed for public inspection January 19, 2018, 9:00 a.m.] _______
1 The Committee's Final Reports should not be confused with the official Committee Comments to the rules. Also, note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the Committee's Comments or the contents of the Committee's explanatory Final Reports.
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
