THE COURTS
Title 231--RULES
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
PART I. GENERAL
[231 PA. CODE CH. 200]
Amendment of Rule 227.1(b) Governing Post-Trial Practice; No. 412 Civil Procedural Rules; Doc. No. 5
[34 Pa.B. 4107]
Order Per Curiam:
And Now, this 21st day of July, 2004, Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1(b) is amended to read as follows.
Whereas prior distribution and publication of this amendment would otherwise be required, it has been determined that immediate promulgation of the amendment is required in the interest of justice and efficient administration.
This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b) and shall be effective immediately.
Annex A
TITLE 231. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
PART I. GENERAL
CHAPTER 200. BUSINESS OF COURTS Rule 227.1. Post-Trial Relief.
* * * * * (b) [Post-trial] Except as otherwise provided by Pa.R.E. 103(a), post-trial relief may not be granted unless the grounds therefor,
* * * * * Official Note: If no objection is made, error which could have been corrected in pre-trial proceedings or during trial by timely objection may not constitute a ground for post-trial relief.
Pa.R.E. 103(a) provides that the specific ground for an overruled objection, or the substance of excluded evidence, need not be stated at or prior to trial, or without having made an offer of proof, if the ground of the objection, or the substance of the evidence sought to be introduced, was apparent from the context.
* * * * *
Explanatory Comment Prior to the present amendment, Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1(b) was inconsistent with Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 103(a). Civil Rule 227.1(b) required without exception that grounds for post-trial relief be raised in pre-trial proceedings or at trial. Evidence Rule 103(a), however, did not require that the specific ground for an erroneous evidentiary ruling be raised prior to or at trial if the ground was apparent from the context. The present amendment to Civil Rule 227.1 carves out an exception for matters within the scope of Evidence Rule 103(a), thereby eliminating the inconsistency between the two rules.
By the Civil Procedural Rules Committee
R. STANTON WETTICK, Jr.,
Chair
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 04-1430. Filed for public inspection August 6, 2004, 9:00 a.m.]
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.