THE COURTS
Title 231—RULES OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE
PART I. GENERAL
[ 231 PA. CODE CHS. 1910, 1915 AND 1920 ]
Amendment of Rules 1910.16-4, 1910.16-6, 1915.4, 1920.51, 1920.52 and 1920.73 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure; No. 528; Civil Procedural Rules
[40 Pa.B. 4140]
[Saturday, July 24, 2010]
Order Per Curiam:
And Now, this 8th day of July, 2010, upon the recommendation of the Domestic Relations Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, 38 Pa.B. 6689 (December 13, 2008), and West's Pennsylvania Reporter, 959 A.2d No. 2, Ct.R-30-40 (December 19, 2008):
It Is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rules 1910.16-4, 1910.16-6, 1915.4, 1920.51, 1920.52, and 1920.73 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure are amended in the following form.
This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective in 60 days on September 6, 2010.
Annex A
TITLE 231. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
PART I. GENERAL
CHAPTER 1910. ACTIONS FOR SUPPORT Rule 1910.16-4. Support Guidelines. Calculation of Support Obligation. Formula.
* * * * * (e) Support Obligations When Custodial Parent Owes Spousal Support. Where children are residing with the spouse obligated to pay spousal support or alimony pendente lite (custodial parent) and the other spouse (non-custodial parent) has a legal obligation to support the children, the guideline amount of spousal support or alimony pendente lite shall be determined by offsetting the non-custodial parent's obligation for support of the children and the custodial parent's obligation of spousal support or alimony pendente lite, and awarding the net difference either to the non-custodial parent as spousal support/alimony pendente lite or to the custodial parent as child support as the circumstances warrant
[The following example uses the formula to show the steps followed to determine the amount of the non-custodial parent's support obligation to the children and the effect of that obligation upon the custodial parent's spousal support obligation. The example assumes that the parties have two children and the non-custodial parent's net monthly income is $1,000 and the custodial parent's net monthly income is $2,600.] The calculation is a five-step process. First, determine the spousal support obligation of the custodial parent to the non-custodial parent based upon their net incomes from the formula for spousal support without dependent children[, i.e., $640]. Second, recompute the net income of the parties assuming the payment of the spousal support [so that $640 is deducted from the custodial parent's net income, now $1,960, and added to the non-custodial parent's net income, now $1,640]. Third, determine the child support obligation of the non-custodial parent for two children[, i.e., $536]. Fourth, determine the recomputed support obligation of the custodial parent to the non-custodial parent by subtracting the non-custodial parent's child support obligation from Step 3 [($536)] from the original support obligation determined in Step 1 [($640). The recomputed spousal support is $104]. Fifth, because the first step creates additional tax liability for the recipient non-custodial parent and additional tax deductions for the payor custodial parent and the third step involves an offset of the child support owed by the non-custodial parent against the spousal support or alimony pendente lite owed by the custodial parent, only that reduced amount will be taxable. Therefore, upon application of either party, the trier of fact may consider as a deviation factor the ultimate tax effect of the calculation.
* * * * * Rule 1910.16-6. Support Guidelines. Adjustments to the Basic Support Obligation. Allocation of Additional Expenses.
* * * * * (b) Health Insurance Premiums.
(1) A party's payment of a premium to provide health insurance coverage on behalf of the other party and/or the children shall be allocated between the parties in proportion to their net incomes, including the portion of the premium attributable to the party who is paying it, as long as a statutory duty of support is owed to the party who is paying the premium. If there is no statutory duty of support owed to the party who is paying the premium, the portion attributable to that person must be deducted from the premium as set forth in subdivision (2) below. If health insurance coverage for a child who is the subject of the support proceeding is being provided and paid for by a third party resident of [the] either party's household, the cost shall be allocated between the parties in proportion to their net incomes. If the obligor is paying the premium, then the obligee's share is deducted from the obligor's basic support obligation. If the obligee is paying the premium, then the obligor's share is added to his or her basic support obligation. Employer-paid premiums are not subject to allocation.
(2) When the health insurance covers a party to whom no statutory duty of support is owed, even if that person is paying the premium as set forth in subdivision (1) above, or other persons who are not parties to the support action or children who are not the subjects of the support action, the portion of the premium attributable to them must be excluded from allocation. In the event that evidence as to this portion is not [known or cannot be verified] submitted by either party, it shall be calculated as follows. First, determine the cost per person by dividing the total cost of the premium by the number of persons covered under the policy. Second, multiply the cost per person by the number of persons who are not owed a statutory duty of support, or are not parties to, or the subject of the support action. The resulting amount is excluded from allocation.
(2.1) The actual incremental amount of the premium which provides coverage for the subjects of the support order, if submitted by either party, shall be used in determining the amount of the premium to be allocated between the parties. If not submitted by either party, then the amount of the premium shall be divided by the number of persons covered to calculate the portion of the premium that provides coverage to each person.
Example 1. If the parties are separated, but not divorced, and Husband pays $200 per month toward the cost of a health insurance policy provided through his employer which covers himself, Wife, the parties' child, and two additional children from a previous marriage, the portion of the premium attributable to the additional two children, if not otherwise verifiable or known with reasonable ease and certainty, is calculated by dividing $200 by five persons and then multiplying the resulting amount of $40 per person by the two additional children, for a total of $80 to be excluded from allocation. Deduct this amount from the total cost of the premium to arrive at the portion of the premium to be allocated between the parties—$120. Since Husband is paying the premium, and spouses have a statutory duty to support one another pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 4321, Wife's percentage share of the $120 is deducted from Husband's support obligation. If Wife had been providing the coverage, then Husband's percentage share would be added to his basic support obligation.* * * * *
CHAPTER 1915. ACTIONS FOR CUSTODY, PARTIAL CUSTODY AND VISITATION OF MINOR CHILDREN Rule 1915.4. Prompt Disposition of Custody Cases.
* * * * * (b) Listing Trials Before the Court. Depending upon the procedure in the judicial district, within 180 days of the filing of the complaint either the court shall automatically enter an order scheduling a trial before a judge or a party shall file a praecipe, motion or request for trial, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision. If it is not the practice of the court to automatically schedule trials and neither party files a praecipe, motion or request for trial within 180 days of filing of the pleading, the court shall dismiss the matter unless the moving party has been granted an extension for good cause shown, which extension shall not exceed 60 days beyond the 180 day limit. A further reasonable extension may be granted by the court upon agreement of the parties or when the court finds, on the record, compelling circumstances for a further reasonable extension.
* * * * * Official Note: For service of original process in custody, partial custody and visitation matters, see Rule 1930.4.
Rescinded June 20, 1985, effective Jan. 1, 1986. Note amended Oct. 2, 1995, effective Jan. 1, 1996. Replaced by new rule.
Explanatory Comment—2000 A new rule requiring prompt custody trials was recommended by a special committee established by the Pennsylvania Superior Court. That committee concluded that the interests of children who are the subjects of custody litigation would best be served by a requirement that the litigation be concluded within specific time frames.
CHAPTER 1920. ACTIONS OF DIVORCE OR FOR ANNULMENT OF MARRIAGE Rule 1920.51. Hearing by the Court. Appointment of Master. Notice of Hearing.
(a)(1) The court may hear the testimony or, upon its own motion or the motion of either party, may appoint a master with respect to all or any of the matters specified in subdivision (a)(2)(i) to consider same and issue a report and recommendation. The order of appointment shall specify the matters which are referred to the master.
(2)(i) The court may appoint a master in an action of divorce under Section 3301(a), (b) and (d)(1)(ii) of the Divorce Code, an action for annulment, and the claims for alimony, alimony pendente lite, equitable distribution of marital property, child support, partial custody or visitation, or counsel fees, costs and expenses, or any aspect thereof.
(ii) [No] If there are no claims other than divorce, no master may be appointed [as to the claim] to determine grounds for divorce [in an action under Section] if either party has asserted grounds for divorce pursuant to § 3301(c) or § 3301(d)(1)(i) of the Divorce Code. A master may be appointed to hear ancillary economic claims in a divorce action pursuant to § 3301(c) or § 3301(d) of the Divorce Code. The master may be appointed to hear ancillary economic claims prior to the entry of a divorce decree if grounds for divorce have been established.
(iii) No master may be appointed in a claim for legal, physical or shared custody or paternity.
Official Note: Section 3321 of the Divorce Code, 23 [Pa.C.S.] Pa.C.S.A. § 3321, prohibits the appointment of a master as to the claims of custody and paternity.
(3) The motion for the appointment of a master and the order shall be substantially in the form prescribed by Rule 1920.74.
(4) A permanent or standing master employed by a judicial district shall not practice family law before a conference officer, hearing officer or permanent or standing master employed by the same judicial district.
Official Note: Hearing conference officers preside at office conferences under [Support] Rule 1910.11. Hearing officers preside at hearings under [Support] Rule 1910.12. The appointment of masters to hear actions in divorce or for annulment of marriage is authorized by [Divorce] Rule 1920.51.
(b) Written notice of the hearing shall be given to each attorney of record by the master. If a master has not been appointed, the prothonotary, clerk or other officer designated by the court shall give the notice.
(c) If no attorney has appeared of record for a party, notice of the hearing shall be given to the party by the 1master, or if a master has not been appointed, by the prothonotary, clerk or other officer designated by the court, as follows:
(1) to the plaintiff, by ordinary mail to the address on the complaint;
(2) to the defendant,
(i) if service of the complaint was made other than pursuant to special order of court, by ordinary mail to the defendant's last known address; or
(ii) if service of the complaint was made pursuant to special order of court, (a) by sending a copy of the notice by ordinary mail to the persons, if any, named in the investigation affidavit, likely to know the present whereabouts of the defendant; and (b) by sending a copy by registered mail to the defendant's last known address.
Official Note: Under [Definition] Rule 76, registered mail includes certified mail.
(d) Advertising of notice of the hearing shall not be required.
(e) Proof of notice shall be filed of record.
Official Note: Consistent with [Section] §§ 3301(e) of the Divorce Code as amended, these rules contemplate that if a divorce decree may be entered under the no fault provisions of [Section] §§§§ 3301(c) or (d), a divorce decree will be entered on these grounds and no hearing shall be required on any other grounds.
Explanatory Comment—1994 While subdivision (a)(2)(ii) clearly prohibits appointment of a master to determine a divorce claim brought under §§ 3301(c) or 3301(d), the provision does permit a master to hear claims which are joined with the divorce action.
The rule is amended to conform with proposed new Rules 1915.4-1 and 1915.4-2, and to remove the implied prohibition against the use of hearing officers in partial custody or visitation cases.
Explanatory Comment—2010 The rule is amended to clarify the role of the master in a divorce case when either party has asserted grounds for divorce pursuant to § 3301(c) or § 3301(d) of the Divorce Code. The rule had been interpreted in some jurisdictions as requiring the entry of a bifurcated decree before a master could be appointed to hear economic claims.
Rule 1920.52. Hearing by the Court. Decision. No Post-trial Relief. Decree.
* * * * * Official Note: The procedure relating to [Motions for Reconsideration] motions for reconsideration is set forth in Rule 1930.2.
(c) The court need not determine all claims at one time but may enter a decree adjudicating a specific claim or claims. However, unless by agreement of the parties, no bifurcated decree of divorce shall be entered except as set forth in 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 3323(c.1). In any bifurcated decree entered by the court without the agreement of the parties, the court shall state with specificity the compelling circumstances that exist for the entry of the decree and the economic provisions sufficient to protect the non-moving party.
(d) In all cases the court shall enter a decree separately adjudicating each claim raised.
Explanatory Comment—2010 The Divorce Code was amended in 2004 to make it more difficult for the court to enter a bifurcated divorce decree absent the agreement of the parties. Section 3323(c.1) became effective on January 28, 2005 and limits the circumstances in which the court may enter a bifurcated decree, requiring the establishment of grounds for divorce, compelling circumstances for the entry of the decree and sufficient economic protections for the non-moving party.
Rule 1920.73. Notice of Intention to Request Entry of Divorce Decree. Praecipe to Transmit Record Forms.
* * * * * (b) The praecipe to transmit the record prescribed by Rule 1920.42 shall be in substantially the following form:
(Caption)
PRAECIPE TO TRANSMIT RECORD To the Prothonotary:
Transmit the record, together with the following information, to the court for entry of a divorce decree:
1. Ground for divorce: irretrievable breakdown under § (3301(c)) and § (3301(d)(1)) of the Divorce Code. (Strike out inapplicable section.)
2. Date and manner of service of the complaint:
_________________ .
3. Complete either paragraph (a) or (b).
(a) Date of execution of the affidavit of consent required by § 3301(c) of the Divorce Code: by plain- tiff ______ ; by defendant ______ .
(b)(1) Date of execution of the affidavit required by § 3301(d) of the Divorce Code:
_________________ ;
(2) Date of filing and service of the [plaintiff's] § 3301(d) affidavit upon the [respondent] opposing party:
_________________ .
4. Related claim spending:
_________________
_________________
5. Complete either (a) or (b).
(a) Date and manner of service of the notice of intention to file praecipe to transmit record, a copy of which is attached:
_________________
(b) Date plaintiff's Waiver of Notice was filed with the prothonotary:
_________________
Date defendant's Waiver of Notice was filed with the prothonotary:
_________________
__________
Attorney for (PLAINTIFF)
(DEFENDANT)
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 10-1317. Filed for public inspection July 23, 2010, 9:00 a.m.]
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
