Pennsylvania Code
Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Bulletin website includes the following: Rulemakings by State agencies; Proposed Rulemakings by State agencies; State agency notices; the Governor’s Proclamations and Executive Orders; Actions by the General Assembly; and Statewide and local court rules.

PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 14-1556

COURTS

PART I. GENERAL

[ 231 PA. CODE CH. 4000 ]

Amendment of Rule 4003.5 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; No. 604 Civil Procedural Rules Doc.

[44 Pa.B. 4996]
[Saturday, July 26, 2014]

Order

Per Curiam

 And Now, this 10th day of July, 2014, upon the recommendation of the Civil Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published at 40 Pa.B. 7334 (December 25, 2010):

 It Is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 4003.5 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure is amended in the following form.

 This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective August 9, 2014.

 Mr. Justice Saylor dissents. See Barrick v. Holy Spirit Hosp. of Sisters of Christian Charity, 91 A.3d 680, 689 (Pa. 2014) (Opinion in Support of Reversal) (Saylor, J.).

Annex A

TITLE 231. RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

PART I. GENERAL

CHAPTER 4000. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY

Rule 4003.5. Discovery of Expert Testimony. Trial Preparation Material.

 (a) Discovery of facts known and opinions held by an expert, otherwise discoverable under the provisions of Rule 4003.1 and acquired or developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial, may be obtained as follows:

 (1) A party may through interrogatories require

 [(a)] (A) any other party to identify each person whom the other party expects to call as an expert witness at trial and to state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify and

 [(b)] (B) subject to the provisions of subdivision (a)(4), the other party to have each expert so identified state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion. The party answering the interrogatories may file as his or her answer a report of the expert or have the interrogatories answered by the expert. The answer or separate report shall be signed by the expert.

 (2) Upon cause shown, the court may order further discovery by other means, subject to

 (A) such restrictions as to scope and such provisions concerning fees and expenses as the court may deem appropriate[.], and

 (B) the provisions of subdivision (a)(4) of this rule.

 (3) A party may not discover facts known or opinions held by an expert who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of litigation or preparation for trial and who is not expected to be called as a witness at trial, except a medical expert as provided in Rule 4010(b) or except on order of court as to any other expert upon a showing of exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable for the party seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other means, subject to such restrictions as to scope and such provisions concerning fees and expenses as the court may deem appropriate.

 Official Note: For additional provisions governing the production of expert reports in medical professional liability actions, see Rule 1042.26 et seq. Nothing in Rule 1042.26 et seq. precludes the entry of a court order under this rule.

 (4) A party may not discover the communications between another party's attorney and any expert who is to be identified pursuant to subdivision (a)(1)(A) or from whom discovery is permitted under subdivision (a)(3) regardless of the form of the communications, except in circumstances that would warrant the disclosure of privileged communications under Pennsylvania law. This provision protects from discovery draft expert reports and any communications between another party's attorney and experts relating to such drafts.

 (b) An expert witness whose identity is not disclosed in compliance with subdivision (a)(1) of this rule shall not be permitted to testify on behalf of the defaulting party at the trial of the action. However, if the failure to disclose the identity of the witness is the result of extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the defaulting party, the court may grant a continuance or other appropriate relief.

*  *  *  *  *

Explanatory Comment

 The Supreme Court has amended Rule 4003.5 governing the discovery of expert testimony. Recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have prohibited the discovery of communications between an attorney and his or her expert witness unless those communications (1) relate to compensation for the expert's study or testimony, (2) identify facts or data that the party's attorney provided and that the expert considered in forming the opinions to be expressed, or (3) identify assumptions that the party's attorney provided and that the expert relied on in forming the opinions to be expressed. See FRCP 26(b)(4)(C), effective December 31, 2010.

 Under current practice in Pennsylvania, few attorneys have been seeking discovery of the communications between an opposing attorney and his or her expert. The proposed amendment to Rule 4003.5 follows the federal rule in explicitly prohibiting the discovery of such communications. However, it does not include the exceptions in the federal rule to those communications because of the differences between the federal rules and the Pennsylvania rules governing the scope of discovery of expert testimony.

 The federal rules of civil procedure permit an expert to be deposed after the expert report has been filed. The exceptions enumerated above simply describe some of the matters that may be covered in a deposition. However, in the absence of cause shown, the Pennsylvania rules of civil procedure do not permit an expert to be deposed. Thus, the exceptions within the federal rule are inconsistent with the restrictions of the Pennsylvania rules of civil procedure governing discovery of expert witnesses.

 In Pennsylvania, questions regarding the compensation of the expert have traditionally been addressed at trial; there is no indication that this procedure is not working well.

 In addition, the facts or data provided by the attorney that the expert considered, as well as the assumptions provided by the attorney that the expert relied on in forming his or her opinion, are covered by Rule 4003.5(a)(1)(B), which requires the expert to ''state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and summary of the ground for each opinion.'' If facts or data which the expert considered were provided by counsel or if the expert relied on assumptions provided by counsel, they must be included in the expert report. See Rule 4003.5(c) which provides that the expert's direct testimony at trial may not be inconsistent with or go beyond the fair scope of his or her testimony set forth in the report. If the expert report is unclear as to the facts upon which the expert relied, upon motion of a party, the trial court should order the filing of a supplemental report that complies with Rule 4005.3(a)(1).

By the Civil Procedural
Rules Committee

PETER J. HOFFMAN, 
Chair

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 14-1556. Filed for public inspection July 25, 2014, 9:00 a.m.]


No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.