Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Code website reflects the Pennsylvania Code changes effective through 54 Pa.B. 2336 (April 27, 2024).

37 Pa. Code § 191.9. [Reserved].

§ 191.9. [Reserved].


Source

   The provisions of this §  191.9 adopted October 7, 1977, effective October 8, 1977, 7 Pa.B. 2896; amended January 4, 1980, effective January 5, 1980, 10 Pa.B. 40; amended December 19, 1986, effective December 20, 1986, 16 Pa.B. 4878; amended July 28, 1989, effective July 29, 1989, 19 Pa.B. 3164; reserved December 22, 2006, effective December 23, 2006, 36 Pa.B. 7815. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (261632), (237985) to (237986) and (261633) to (261635).

Notes of Decisions

   Admissible Evidence

   Crime Victim’s Compensation Board need not consider evidence regarding future inflation and likelihood of victim’s future salary increases since such evidence would be purely speculative and outside the scope of compensation for actual losses under The Administrative Code of 1929 (71 P. S. § §  180-7—180-7.18); the statutory formulation of compensation excludes traditional measures of tort damages. Fortson v. Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 512 A.2d 734 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986); appeal denied 520 A.2d 1386 (Pa. 1987).

   Deferral of Payments

   The Board erred in failing to make a present award to a petitioner for loss of support, although it may elect to defer payments until such time as the petitioner’s Social Security payments fall below the amount her husband would have provided. Peterson v. Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 404 A.2d 1364 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1979).

   Funeral and Burial Expenses

   Reimbursement received from Crime Victim’s Compensation Board for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in funeral and burial of claimant’s spouse is limited to $2,000, which amount must be reduced by amount of social security death benefit, but not, however, by amount of survivor’s benefits received by children of claimant and deceased. Friedman v. Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 527 A.2d 177 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987); appeal denied 532 A.2d 438 (Pa. 1987).

   Guardian

   The guardian of a minor’s estate, never having physical custody of a minor, does not qualify as a ‘‘guardian’’ for purposes of pursuing compensation on behalf of a minor since the purpose of the fund is not to enrich the estate of a minor. Ciaverelli v. Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 621 A.2d 1232 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1993).

   Innocent Victims

   This regulation seeks to discourage rash behavior and is in accord with the legislative mandate that the Crime Victim’s Compensation Board compensate only innocent victims of crime. Ortell v. Crime Victims Compensation Board, 552 A.2d 766 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989).

   Public Funds Offset

   Payout from crime victim’s pension fund, although from a public pension fund, is not within the ‘‘public funds offset’’ since such payout does not represent ‘‘a grant from the public treasury but instead constitutes deferred compensation which should not be treated differently from a pension received from a private employer.’’ Fortson v. Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 512 A.2d 734 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986); appeal denied 520 A.2d 1386 (Pa. 1987).

   Sufficiency of the Evidence

   A claimant’s evidence, including slips of paper torn from a spiral notebook, of who provided services to her along with the amounts was insufficient information for the Board to determine the validity of a claim for actual losses. Ortell v. Crime Victims Compensation Board, 552 A.2d 766 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989).

   Where rudimentary and unsophisticated bookkeeping practices made it difficult to determine the precise amount of profit generated by the claimant’s roofing business, the Crime Victim’s Compensation Board did not err in finding the evidence insufficient to adequately measure the actual loss sustained, as required by this section. In re Trama, 473 A.2d 744 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1984).

   Validity of Regulation

   This regulation, which provides a formula for computing loss and offsetting payments, represents a rational attempt by the Board to conserve funds so that more victims of crimes will be able to receive awards and, therefore, is not inconsistent with section 477.9 of The Administrative Code of 1929 (71 P. S. §  180-7.9). Sharpe v. Crime Victim’s Compensation Board, 530 A.2d 520 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987); appeal denied 539 A.2d 812 (Pa. 1988).



No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.


This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.