Subchapter B. REVIEW OF RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF COMPLAINT
Sec.
87.31. Transmission to reviewing hearing committee member.
87.32. Action by reviewing hearing committee member.
87.33. Appeal by Office of Disciplinary Counsel from modification of recommendation.
87.34. Review of recommendation of private reprimand or public reprimand.§ 87.31. Transmission to reviewing hearing committee member.
Upon receipt of a request from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for the assignment of a reviewing hearing committee member to review the disposition of a complaint recommended by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the Executive Office shall assign a reviewing hearing committee member and forward the file with the recommendation of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to the assigned reviewing hearing committee member for action.
Source The provisions of this § 87.31 amended March 11, 2005, effective March 12, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 1656; amended September 27, 2019, effective 30 days after publication, 49 Pa.B. 5552. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (364157).
§ 87.32. Action by reviewing hearing committee member.
(a) General rule. Enforcement Rule 208(a)(3) provides that, except where the complaint is dismissed because the complaint is frivolous or falls outside the jurisdiction of the Board, the reviewing hearing committee member may approve or modify the recommendation of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel concerning the disposition of a complaint.
(b) Approval.
(1) Failure of a reviewing hearing committee member to modify a recommendation within ten days after transmission by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall constitute approval of such recommendation.
(2) When in the judgment of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel prompt prosecution of formal charges is necessary for the protection of the public the Office of Disciplinary Counsel may reduce the period specified in paragraph (1) of this subsection to not less than 24 hours.
(c) Modification. If the reviewing hearing committee member determines to modify the recommendation of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the member shall set forth the determination on Form DB-3 (Referral of Complaint to Reviewing Hearing Committee Member) together with a brief statement of the reasons therefor. Such determination shall be one of the following:
(1) Dismissal of the complaint.
(2) A conditional or unconditional informal admonition.
(3) A conditional or unconditional private reprimand.
(4) A conditional or unconditional public reprimand.
(5) Prosecution of formal charges.
(d) Return of file. Upon making a determination, but in no event later than 48 hours after the expiration of the period set forth in subsection (b) of this section, the reviewing hearing committee member shall return the file to the originating district office of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Source The provisions of this § 87.32 amended July 8, 1983, effective July 9, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 2138; amended March 11, 2005, effective March 12, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 1656; amended August 10, 2012, effective August 11, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 5156. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (343804) to (343805).
§ 87.33. Appeal by Office of Disciplinary Counsel from modification of recommendation.
(a) General rule. Enforcement Rule 208(a)(4) provides that Disciplinary Counsel may appeal the recommended disposition directed by a reviewing hearing committee member to a reviewing panel composed of three members of the Board. The appeal shall be set forth on Form DB-8 (Appeal from Determination of Reviewing Member), shall state briefly the grounds relied upon by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for recommending modification of the determination of the reviewing hearing committee member. The appeal shall be filed with the Board Prothonotary within 30 days after the determination of the reviewing hearing committee member has become effective. The preceding sentence is not applicable to a motion made by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to dismiss formal charges, which motion may be made at any time.
(b) Appeal administrative. The appeal under subsection (a) shall be administrative and not adversary in nature. Copies of the appeal shall be available only to the Board and neither the respondent-attorney nor the reviewing hearing committee member shall be deemed a party to the appeal or have any right to be heard with respect thereto. See also § 93.103 (relating to identity of reviewing hearing committee member).
(c) Action by Board. The Executive Office shall transmit the Form DB-8 and related file to a panel of three members of the Board designated by the Chair, who shall consider the appeal and, as provided by Enforcement Rule 208(a)(4), order that the matter be concluded by dismissal, conditional or unconditional informal admonition or conditional or unconditional private reprimand, or conditional or unconditional public reprimand, or direct that a formal proceeding be instituted before a hearing committee or special master in the appropriate disciplinary district.
(d) Notice of Board action. The Executive Office shall return the Form DB-8 and related file, showing the action of the reviewing panel of the Board on the appeal, to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and shall notify the reviewing hearing committee member of the action taken by the Board.
Source The provisions of this § 87.33 amended July 8, 1983, effective July 9, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 2138; amended January 15, 1988, effective January 16, 1988, 18 Pa.B. 241; amended March 10, 1989, effective March 11, 1989, 19 Pa.B. 952; amended April 13, 1990, effective April 14, 1990, 20 Pa.B. 2009; amended March 11, 2005, effective March 12, 2005, 35 Pa.B. 1656; amended August 10, 2012, effective August 11, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 5156; amended November 2, 2012, effective November 3, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 6864; amended September 27, 2019, effective 30 days after publication, 49 Pa.B. 5552. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (364158).
§ 87.34. Review of recommendation of private reprimand or public reprimand.
(a) General rule. Enforcement Rule 208(a)(5) provides that a recommendation by a reviewing hearing committee member for a conditional or unconditional private or public reprimand shall be reviewed by a panel composed of three members of the Board who may approve or modify.
(b) Procedure. Where a recommendation by a reviewing hearing committee member for a conditional or unconditional private or public reprimand is not appealed by Disciplinary Counsel, the Executive Office shall transmit the file to a panel of three members of the Board designated by the Chair, who shall consider the matter and, as provided by Enforcement Rule 208(a)(5), approve or modify the recommendation for private or public reprimand.
(c) Notice of Board action. The Executive Office shall return the file, showing the action of the reviewing panel of the Board, to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and shall notify the reviewing hearing committee member of the action taken by the Board.
Source The provisions of this § 87.34 adopted July 8, 1983, effective July 9, 1983, 13 Pa.B. 2138; amended March 10, 1989, effective March 11, 1989, 19 Pa.B. 952; amended August 10, 2012, effective August 11, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 5156; amended November 2, 2012, effective November 3, 2012, 42 Pa.B. 6864; amended September 27, 2019, effective 30 days after publication, 49 Pa.B. 5552. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (364158) to (364159).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
