Rule 3544. OrdersSupplementary Target Specific.
A proposed order for a supplementary target specific wiretap shall be submitted to the Assigned Judge, and it shall state that based on the application, the Assigned Judge finds reasonable suspicion that:
A. The target of the original target specific wiretap has in fact changed communication devices or facilities or is presently using additional communication devices, communications facilities, or places.
B. The target of the original target specific wiretap is likely to use the specified communications device or facility for criminal purposes similar to or related to those specified in the original order.
C. The Applicant will be responsible for the supervision of the interception.
Source The provisions of this Rule 3544 adopted November 24, 2020, effective immediately, 50 Pa.B. 6994.
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.