Rule 1055. Pleading More Than One Cause of Action.
The plaintiff may state in the complaint any cause of action for rents, profits or any other damages which arise from the defendant’s possession of the land.
Comment The inability to join the action for delinquent rent has necessitated two separate actions when possession of the property and delinquent rent are both sought. An action in ejectment is required to obtain possession of the property and an action in assumpsit is required to recover the rent. Although not permitted in the court of common pleas, such joinder is permitted by the Rules of Civil Procedure for Justices of the Peace. Pa. R.P.C.J.P. 503C (8) permits the complaint to include amount of rent, if any, which remains due and unpaid . . . .’’
In addition to delinquent rent, there are other claims for damages which cannot presently be joined, such as installment payments due under an installment land contract where the purchaser enters into possession before the time appointed for the conveyance of title. Under the Installment Land Contract Law of 1968, Act of June 8, 1965, No. 81, 68 P. S. § 901 et seq., applicable to cities and counties of the first and second class, the seller upon termination may, subject to restrictions set forth in the Act, maintain actions for recovery of possession and for unpaid installments prior to the surrender of the land.
The amendment will permit the joinder of causes of action for delinquent rent or delinquent installments under an installment land contract entered into in any city or county of the Commonwealth. Damages for ‘‘use of or injury to the land,’’ presently permitted under the rule, are embraced in the new language, ‘‘damages which arise from the defendant’s possession of the land.’’
Concurrently with the enlargement of the plaintiff’s right to joinder, the defendant’s right to counterclaim has also been enlarged. Under present Rule 1056, the defendant may counterclaim only if the plaintiff demands damages. The amendment deletes this language, thus eliminating the dependence of a counterclaim on the assertion of a claim by the plaintiff. This would permit a defendant under a residential lease to assert a claim for breach of warranty of habitability recognized by the decisions in Pugh v. Holmes, 253 Pa. Super. 76, 384 A.2d 1234 (1978), Beasley v. Freedman, 256 Pa. Super. 208, 389 A.2d 1087 (1978), and Fair v. Negley, 257 Pa. Super. 50, 390 A.2d 240 (1978).
Source The provisions of this Rule 1055 adopted June 25, 1946, effective January 1, 1947; amended March 12, 1979, effective April 7, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 1167. Immediately preceding text appears at serial page (22272).
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
