SUPERSEDEAS AND STAYS
Rule 3315. Review of Stay Orders of Appellate Courts.
Where the Superior Court or the Commonwealth Court in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction has entered an order under Chapter 17 (effect of appeals; supersedeas and stays), such order may be further reviewed by any justice of the Supreme Court in the manner prescribed by Chapter 17 with respect to appellate review of supersedeas and stay determinations of lower courts.
Official Note
After a party has applied for a stay, etc., in the trial court, and a further application has been acted on by the Superior Court or the Commonwealth Court, or by a judge thereof, a further application may be made under this rule to the Supreme Court or to a justice thereof. Under the prior practice a petition for allowance of appeal was required in the Supreme Court under Rule 1702(b) in order to maintain the validity of the Supreme Court action on the stay, etc. Rule 1702(c) (Supreme Court review of appellate court supersedeas and stay determinations) now provides that no appeal or petition need be filed to support jurisdiction under this rule. However, this rule does not invite routine reapplications in the Supreme Court, but only clarifies the procedure when the Court exercises its inherent supervisory powers in cases of egregious error below. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 726 (extraordinary jurisdiction).
Source The provisions of this Rule 3315 adopted May 16, 1979, effective September 30, 1979, 9 Pa.B. 1740.
No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.
This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.
